Customer Discussions > Politics forum

Condoleezza Rice for VP?....


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 76-100 of 146 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 9:31:13 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 9:45:22 AM PDT
As Richard says he can call himself anything he wants to. His true colors are flying pretty high for all of us to see. He is Republican, through and through. If anyone is stupid enough to actually believe that Richard is a Libertarian, then they are probably Republicans too. Remember there IS a correlation between lack of education and party affiliation among whites. Judging from his posts and his profile, Richard is about as white as they come.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 9:54:46 AM PDT
Eagle Eye says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 10:06:14 AM PDT
A customer says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 10:12:25 AM PDT
Just who are you calling "Boy." Take a look in the mirror, racist.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:11:09 AM PDT
Richard is a RINO trying to convince everyone he's a libertarian. Its kind of pathetic.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:12:07 AM PDT
Against it. No one should be forced by the government to buy anything they do not wish to buy, and the federal government has no buisness taking so much power onto themselves.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:15:12 AM PDT
What do they call someone who never supports libertarians and always supports RINO's? Oh, yeah, a Republican. Cain, Santorum, Romney, Rice, what do all these people have in common? They aren't libertarian. And yet Wright supported at one time or another every one of them. Oh, and I think Newt. Meanwhile he tries to tell people who are voting for libertarians that they are throwing their vote away, or are Obama supporters in disguise. The mind boggles at the thought.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:15:31 AM PDT
Kevin says:
"No one should be forced by the government to buy anything they do not wish to buy"

There goes the state gov. mandate on car insurance.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:17:47 AM PDT
It is a shame the Condi thing is just a p.r. stunt and there is no way Romney would ever have her as the VP candidate. There would be a mutiny at the convention, probably even a third party run. Republicans like to pose as tolerant but they sure don't want their bluff called with a pro choice gay black female!

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:21:20 AM PDT
Eagle Eye says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:23:11 AM PDT
Only if you own a car. You are not forced to buy car insurance if you do not own one. Obamacare places a requirement to buy a product simply because you exist.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:23:24 AM PDT
Any true libertarian would.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:23:41 AM PDT
nurtz

it will drive more people to bama
the moderates, real republicans, and tea party have been chased off
if the choice is another rino neocon or bama we will vote dem to send the grumpy old pervert establishment a message

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:26:12 AM PDT
Vote Gary Johnson. He's the only qualified candidate running.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:31:43 AM PDT
Eagle Eye says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:33:51 AM PDT
Eagle Eye says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:35:05 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jul 15, 2012 11:45:05 AM PDT
A customer says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:39:17 AM PDT
not true

you can pay into the uninsured motorist fund
much cheaper than insurance

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:47:55 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jul 15, 2012 4:03:05 PM PDT
Kevin says:
"Only if you own a car. You are not forced to buy car insurance if you do not own one. "

A mandate is a mandate. You are now arguing the conditions.

"Obamacare places a requirement to buy a product simply because you exist. "

Only if you exist without coverage at the risk of draining my bank account if you become seriously ill.

Now, for one thing, you would not need it if you were dead. For another, you'd need to buy it before you get sick so you would be covered and I would not end up paying for your medical bills. Thirdly, If you refuse to participate in a plan that saves the rest of us money, then you should be penalized for imposing on others, just like losing your driving privilege and paying a monitory fine if you are caught driving without a DL.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:49:29 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 22, 2012 10:09:14 PM PDT
Kevin says:
What a waste of space, Bagel Eyes.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:53:00 AM PDT
When I lived in Florida, if you could show proof that you had sufficient cash on hand (I forget the details regarding how much) to cover your liabilities, you didn't have to have car insurance. But in every state I am aware of, you don't HAVE to buy car insurance...if you don't want to take a car on the road. Nobody says you have to drive anywhere. Or even buy a car. So much for a state mandate.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:55:21 AM PDT
That is why the Obama camp petitioned the SCOTUS that it was a tax. Congress does have the right to tax a body just for being alive. Don't like it, but here it is.

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2012 11:58:26 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jul 15, 2012 11:59:34 AM PDT
Kevin says:
"So much for a state mandate. "

The mandate only addresses drivers. If you drive, you must carry liability insurance. You'll be penalized if you do not.

The ACA mandate only addresses those who can afford to buy coverage but refuse to.

Both mandates only address a particular segment of the population and not everyone.

Posted on Jul 15, 2012 12:02:00 PM PDT
Superman is not for real. Nobody could be that stupid in reality.
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Politics forum
Participants:  30
Total posts:  146
Initial post:  Jul 13, 2012
Latest post:  Jul 18, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions