Customer Discussions > Politics forum

Obamaland: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 201-225 of 1000 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:31:45 AM PDT
It's now become clear that these movies are prophecies about what will happen if Obama gets re-elected. Let those who have eyes, see!

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:35:13 AM PDT
S. Evans says:
arpard fazakas says: "So you think if Obama got re-elected he might seriously consider abolishing elections?"

Oh yes. I took off my tinfoil hat and found out some other things too. He's going to send all the elderly out to die. He's going to let the top rappers come live in the WH. Right now his agents are secretly placing monitors in all polling places. All caught voting for (R) candidates will be rounded up and sent to re-education camps run by FEMA where they will study Marxism. Oh, and your guns and Bibles? Toast.

Seriously, Marilyn Martin reminds me of some slavering-yet-earnest religious zealot who's sure that if she just hands out enough Jesus tracts, she'll save one soul and it will be So Worth It.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:36:58 AM PDT
Lientje says:
Marilyn:

Obamaland: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

I haven't been able to sleep a wink since you wrote this.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:38:11 AM PDT
John M. Lane says:
If you think Obama is committed to defending our Constitution, you're the guys who need to get out from under the tinfoil hats. He'd throw it under one of his new, Canadian buses in a New York minute if he thought he could get by with it.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:40:28 AM PDT
Mark Time says:
When is the last time anybody in D.C. paid any attention to the constitution?

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:42:10 AM PDT
Lientje says:
John M. Lane:

If you think Obama is committed to defending our Constitution, you're the guys who need to get out from under the tinfoil hats. He'd throw it under one of his new, Canadian buses in a New York minute if he thought he could get by with it.

Perhaps your interpretation of the Constitution is as bad as your interpretation of the Bible.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:42:14 AM PDT
Man, for a minute I thought you were serious!

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:43:08 AM PDT
Whenever it suits their particular argument they trot out the Constitution. Whenever it doesn't they don't.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:43:49 AM PDT
John M. Lane says:
So, a fellow Prussian calls me out for my interpretation of the BIBLE?

Not that it's related to the question, what are you talking about, Lily White?

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:45:19 AM PDT
John M. Lane says:
The Constitution seems to be incovenient for Obama all the time. I suppose that's why I'm trotting it out.

It's on our side this year.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:48:13 AM PDT
Lientje says:
Arpard: "Whenever it suits their particular argument they trot out the Constitution. Whenever it doesn't they don't. "

*****
I'm convinced that the vast majority of the strict constitutionalist patriots really only know maybe 3 articles,
max, and don't know the rest or could care less about them, or seriously wish they would go away.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:48:52 AM PDT
It's very fickle, that document.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:49:15 AM PDT
Lientje says:
John M.: Not that it's related to the question, what are you talking about, Lily White?

What I am saying is that everyone has their own idea what the Constitution says and what the
Bible says.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:50:25 AM PDT
I read somewhere they recently discovered the long lost "Article Zero". It states that if a 3/5 human being is ever elected President, he can abolish the Constitution and set up his own form of government as he sees fit.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:50:46 AM PDT
S. Evans says:
arpard fazakas says: "It's very fickle, that document. "

Yeah. Much like that other one they also love to wave around... their Bible.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:52:04 AM PDT
Yes. You could probably play a game where someone would give you any position at all to defend, and you could find a passage in the Bible to use to defend it.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:53:06 AM PDT
John M. Lane says:
The Constitution was written in English, a language most of us understand, Lily White. It means what it says.

Off-topic, the BIBLE was revealed in Aramaic, Greek, Hebrew and other languages I don't speak and it involves a lot of interpretation because it incorporates poetry, metaphors, and parables.

I agree that the BIBLE is more subjective. The Constitution, however, is quite clear and means what it says. I don't recall ever saying anything other than that.

Do you not agree with what the Constitution says?

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 11:53:59 AM PDT
John M. Lane says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 12:02:42 PM PDT
Agree it means what it says.

The problem is always: "What does it mean when it says what it means"?For this we need nine of the best legal minds in the country to decide, and not uncommonly they split 5-4.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 26, 2012 12:03:08 PM PDT
I could certainly give it a try.

Posted on Apr 29, 2012 9:45:59 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 29, 2012 9:46:51 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 29, 2012 9:55:47 AM PDT
Wow, I've heard of bootlickers before, but doorknoblickers? That's a new low, and also a new high in insults.

"My opponent is nothing but a worthless, lowdown, lying, scumbag of a doorknoblicker!"

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 29, 2012 9:56:24 AM PDT
P.S. there can't be anyone actually named Shmuley Boteach. You have been taken in.

Posted on Apr 29, 2012 10:00:52 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 29, 2012 10:01:11 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 29, 2012 10:02:18 AM PDT
Must be a nom de plume.

That's French for "feather name".
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 



Thank you for your support of Amazon Discussion Forums. Due to the changing needs of Amazon Forums, we have decided to stop supporting the ‘Active discussions in related forums’ feature in order to focus on providing the most value for our customers.  
   
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Politics forum
Participants:  105
Total posts:  2013
Initial post:  Mar 6, 2012
Latest post:  Sep 3, 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions