Customer Discussions > Politics forum

Hillary Clinton is hot!


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-17 of 17 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Apr 17, 2012 7:59:49 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Apr 17, 2012 8:14:06 AM PDT]

Posted on Apr 17, 2012 8:03:33 AM PDT
This is not a good place to post your SPAM. Go to the authors forum.

Posted on Apr 17, 2012 8:22:52 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 17, 2012 8:25:20 AM PDT
It's a good place to ask the question, which the authors forum is not.

What's it going to take to get a female president and do people think Hillary Clinton still has a shot?

Posted on Apr 17, 2012 10:02:58 AM PDT
C. Batty says:
I don't think we still have a shot to get her.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 10:05:57 AM PDT
Certainly not in 2012, but what about 2016? It's been all the talk lately.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 10:24:34 AM PDT
I hope our first female president isn't part of the "establishment." I hope she didn't vote for the Iraq war as a senator, nor the Patriot Act.

In short, you can keep Hillary.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 10:51:46 AM PDT
C. Batty says:
What's in it for her?

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 10:56:27 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 17, 2012 10:56:52 AM PDT
@Cherry Sunshine - I've heard this a lot from women. Valid points.

Posted on Apr 17, 2012 11:25:19 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 17, 2012 11:50:40 AM PDT
She's a lady who's both intelligent and has a good sense of humor, and she can laugh at herself and party with the best of them. But she can also be as serious and thoughtful and articulate and statesman-like as any of our best politicians when she needs to be. We would be extremely blessed and fortunate as a country to have her as our chief executive.

And, yes, when she had the shorter, trademark bobbed hair-do, I thought she was very attractive. Longer hair doesn't work for her. She's also looking extremely tired lately, most likely from the demands of being secretary of state.

Posted on Apr 17, 2012 8:33:28 PM PDT
hillary has never been hot

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 8:49:00 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Apr 17, 2012 11:09:04 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Apr 17, 2012 11:10:08 PM PDT
The other night on the news, they showed one still picture taken of Hillary in a nightclub in some foreign country (can't remember which one) she was in recently, taking a swig from a beer bottle. Then, a second picture was shown of her laughing and hitting the dance floor with a group of locals. This is what I mean...the lady is serious and devoted to her job, but she can also lighten up and party with style. She's probably a lot of fun when she wants to be.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 17, 2012 11:48:11 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 18, 2012 12:59:24 AM PDT
EWWWWWWwwwwwwww...

I hope that you'd kick her out of bed for turning the lights on, or for STOPPING eating the crackers.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 18, 2012 2:06:55 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 18, 2012 6:12:52 AM PDT
I'm someone who supports Secy. Clinton in her work and think she'd make a tremendous president, also believing she has a clear path to the 2016 nomination if she wants it. A poll done by PPP yesterday revealed just that. I put this thread up to see if people in Amazon forums agree on 2016. RobertB above is correct, imo.

I don't want to re-litigate Iraq here, because it's not the thread's issue, but one problem Clinton faced with the progressive community in '08 is exactly what @CherrySunshine said above, a large swath of the Democratic base, who vote and are active in primaries, had a problem with these issues. On Iraq, Clinton didn't read the 90-page National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, but was briefed thoroughly on it. That NIE report was foreshadowing for what became a known fact, which is that we didn't have the goods to go to war over WMD. But again, Iraq is not the subject of this thread.

It's about whether people think Hillary has a shot at 2016.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 20, 2012 5:06:53 AM PDT
You're confusing me on the NIE report, how was it a foreshadowing about what would become a "known fact"?
There seems to be some confusion by war critics that us not finding WMD after the invasion meant:
(a) Saddam did not have WMD before the war (ample evidence exists that it was transported to Syria and the Russians helped him clean up)
(b)he was not simply going to make more, which the ISG report confirms
(c) that he complied with cease fire requirements he disarm and have it confirmed by the UN
(d) that the main reason for the war was actually WMD and not that Saddam was attempting to use oil as a weapon and with the help of his allies in Paris, Moscow and Beijing, was about to deal a fatal blow to the US economy by allowing them into Iraq and put its oil on the world market in Euros, devaluing the dollar by at least several times over as Iran and Venezuela were onboard to join them.

Hillary Clinton would know all of this and that's why she voted for the war. If I have a problem with her being President it might be because of her husband's record as a weak commander in chief and facilitating China's growth. Bill Clinton presided over a period of American prosperity, which ended soon after he left office. As these things are not instant, it has to be realized the good times and Clinton are not directly related other than his policies contributed to their end.

Hillary is not Bill and 2016 is not 1992. However I can't say she'd run things much differently.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the Politics forum

Discussion Replies Latest Post
Announcement
Amazon Discussions Feedback Forum
2810 1 day ago
Evidence supports officer Darren Wilson 67 59 seconds ago
can anyone defend B Hussien Obama? 67 1 minute ago
A startling statistic I heard on MSNBC Morning Joe today 7 2 minutes ago
9/11: Your Comments Debunked 5449 3 minutes ago
Can Anybody Honestly Defend Limbaugh? 245 3 minutes ago
At last I am in a country with no Ebola and where the inept and criminal government is not trying to kill its citizens by spreading Ebola.... 176 4 minutes ago
Leftism Run Amok #3: Don't Say "Boys and Girls" to Children in School! 599 5 minutes ago
This is why smart people don't send their children to public schools 358 6 minutes ago
Obama Golfs For 4 Hours, 40 Minutes On Saturday, Then Holds Nighttime Ebola Meeting-Which New Ebola Czar Skips! 53 8 minutes ago
Good news on the Ebola front. 30 10 minutes ago
Religion is no longer a part of many Americans' lives.... 57 13 minutes ago
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Politics forum
Participants:  9
Total posts:  17
Initial post:  Apr 17, 2012
Latest post:  Apr 20, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions