Customer Discussions > Religion forum

Armageddon Coming? Then Vote!


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-20 of 20 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Nov 3, 2012 9:47:33 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012 9:49:57 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 9:58:09 AM PDT
RR says:
" It is literally about getting rid of this Administration's sheer corruption and evil."

You need to take a chill pill....or stop doing so much coke...

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:07:32 AM PDT
voting wont stop it from coming

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:27:16 AM PDT
RR says:
horse,
"voting wont stop it from coming..."

Yes, certainly within 5B years when the sun burns up its supply of hydrogen, but that hardly seems worth your Jeremiads right now...

Guys like you have been handwaving end of times nonsense for thousands of years. One of you will eventually be right, but not for the right reasons.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:28:44 AM PDT
it is coming
50-150 years is a good estimate

economists say world wide depression in march 2014
that should be a good start to kicking off the final war

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:34:51 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012 10:36:28 AM PDT
RR says:
"50-150 years is a good estimate"
Based on hand-waving....

"economists say world wide depression in march 2014
that should be a good start to kicking off the final war"
So, economists are your new Prophets. Strange religion you have indeed. And of course, how you can have a war starting in a couple of years that lasts long enough to lead to worldwide end-of-times 50-150 years down the road makes no sense. What a CF post.

Your understanding of world events is as bankrupt as your understanding of evolution.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:37:52 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:44:06 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012 10:44:44 AM PDT
RR says:
horse,
"it is totally impossible"

That's why you're a clone of your mom....because there is no such thing as variation through recombination of genetic material. Keep up the cluelessness.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:45:46 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:49:37 AM PDT
RR says:
horse,
"but you cannot increase complexity and ability by random chance"

Yes, that's why evolution isn't random chance. But keep making things up.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:50:52 AM PDT
you need to read darwin
and then come up with an explanation that is believable

if yo usay that God preprogrammed evolution in the dna then i would say yes it happens

but it absolutely cannot happen as you described it

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 10:54:58 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012 10:56:00 AM PDT
RR says:
"you need to read darwin"

Did, you're still wrong. Natural selection isn't random. A lion hunting prey is not indifferent between a bull and a baby elephant. The selection the lion makes is not random. That is just one example that shows your claims are false and misleading.

'God preprogrammed evolution in the dna then i would say yes it happens"
You mean like the Tay-sachs mutation? Pretty terrible god you have.

"but it absolutely cannot happen as you described it"
Hand-waving. Your misrepresentations aren't my descriptions, that's your first problem.

Posted on Nov 3, 2012 10:59:18 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 11:23:28 AM PDT
dunno

baby bush was pure evil

baby bush was the most evil man to ever live

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 11:53:39 AM PDT
'probabilist says:
Hi, Marilyn -

Clearly, you and I disagree--and are poles apart--on the subject of your opening post.

I see putting a Republican in the White House again as a return to the disastrous and anti-middle-class policies of George W. Bush.

I have already voted--for Obama.

'prob

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 1:15:59 PM PDT
RR says:
Marilyn,
"Who better than the Catholics to recognize the sheer evil in our White House?"

So, you're idea is that it's a good idea to put a Catholic into the White House? Ryan is a Catholic Make some effort not to be totally confused.

As mentioned, take your anti-psychotics.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 1:25:21 PM PDT
'probabilist says:
'andthehorseirodeinontoo?' wrote:

> march 2014

and

> the final war

...which leads me to wonder if the year 1914 and the number 144,000 might also have particular meaning for you.

Do they?

Thanks,

'prob

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012 1:30:49 PM PDT
"http://www.judicialwatch.org/corrupt-politicians-lists/washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-for-2011/
TEN MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS FOR 2011
Obama has made this disgusting yearly list for five consecutive years!"

Well, you're right about something. It IS a disgusting list. In fact, Judicial Watch is a disgusting organization.

Posted on Nov 15, 2012 10:09:26 PM PST
'probabilist says:
...

Posted on Nov 16, 2012 5:41:28 AM PST
Brian Curtis says:
I like how she cited Breitbart.com for added credibility.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Religion forum
Participants:  6
Total posts:  20
Initial post:  Nov 3, 2012
Latest post:  Nov 16, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions