I am happy to find that most of the Christians I run into these days no longer believe in a literal Garden of Eden, but I can't find anyone who can explain original sin without the benefit of that parable.
How do evolution/intelligence design Christians avoid the obvious conclusion that God allowed us to evolve in a fallen state and then holds us accountable for being in that fallen state?
The parable of the Garden of Eden has been used in the past to solve this problem by suggesting an illusion of choice (though not very well -- if they hadn't yet eaten of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, how did they know they were doing anything wrong?) and blaming it on Eve...
But how does this new wave of educated Christians explain the theological problem that inevitably comes from dropping a literal interpretation of the Garden of Eden?
Can anyone who thinks this way explain how they have reconciled this problem?
Recent discussions in the Religion forum
AnnouncementAmazon Discussions Feedback Forum
|1407||May 29, 2015|
|Jesus said, "where two or more are gathered, there I am also." Where was Jesus?||91||5 minutes ago|
|In one succinct paragraph, give one piece of evidence for God's existence.||6815||6 minutes ago|
|Atheist dogma||5307||18 minutes ago|
|All religion is based on myth.||2604||19 minutes ago|
|The Supreme Court legalizes same-sex marrige||314||30 minutes ago|
|Here's how free will works||47||52 minutes ago|
|Has anyone else noticed how ridiculous this Bruce Jenner stuff has become?||847||1 hour ago|
|Rational methodology for identifying supernatural intervention||69||1 hour ago|
|"Laudato sì"||14||2 hours ago|
|Gay marriage is now legal in 50 states||21||2 hours ago|
|SCOTUS ends the same sex marriage bans by the states||100||3 hours ago|