Rick Smalley hated bad science. He said if he conducted his research the way that they (evolutionary biologists aka Darwinists) did he would never be respected in the scientific community. Richard Smalley received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1973. He was a professor of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy at Rice University in Texas. Smalley PhD was a pioneer in the development of supersonic beam laser spectroscopy but his major accomplishment came when he received international recognition and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the discovery of a new form of carbon, buckminsterfullerene. His awards also include eight honorary doctor of science degrees.
Dr. Smalley was a Darwinist most of his life. He then began to study intelligent design in the early 2000's and became an outspoken anti-Darwinist. I remember reading about him in Scientific American back in the mid 90s. (FYI: note to Darwinists like Hurd, Thrower, dvimus, Croft... etc, I have worked in the field of science and technology for over 30 years of my career. I work with scientists and engineers on a regular basis, I am one. I work in a laboratory everyday performing experiments and testing with radiation science. I've also attended five colleges and Universities in pursuit of my studies in science.)
This is interesting to me because I had no idea of Dr. Smalley's conversion to Christianity until I read an article about him tonight in a science publication (issn 0819-1530, Vol. 33 No. 2, 2011). Like Dr. Smalley I was a Darwinist:I believed in Darwinian evolution and that we evolved from an apelike creature. I became a theistic evolutionist in the late 90's and then around 2004 I started studying intelligent design. Like Dr. Smalley I began to get angry about the lies I was fed through indoctrination with bad science to get me to believe in evolution.
All of the stories (lies) about the Neanderthal man, Piltdown man, Peking Man Cro-Magnon man etc... are put out there to be factual, and when they are exposed as fraud no one barely mentions it, it is just quietly swept under the rug after the damage is done. The fraudulent "Piltdown Man." was exposed in 1953 as a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan combined with the skull of a fully developed, modern man. In 1923, Franz Weidenreich examined the remains and correctly reported that they consisted of a modern human cranium and an orangutan jaw with filed-down teeth. Weidenreich, being an anatomist, had easily exposed the hoax for what it was. However, it took thirty years for the scientific community to concede that Weidenreich was correct. When the scientific establishment wants to believe something, it is very difficult to change their collective minds. Haeckel's forged drawings remained in text books as some of the best evidence for evolution for 100 years.
Lucy: Nearly all experts agree that Lucy was a 3 foot tall chimpanzee.
Heidelberg Man: Built from a jawbone that was conceded by many to be quite human.
Nebraska Man: Scientifically built up from one tooth, later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig.
Piltdown Man: The jawbone turned out to belong to a modern ape.
Peking Man: Supposedly 500,000 years old, but all evidence has disappeared.
Neanderthal Man: The first Neanderthal remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, much of the evidence now suggests that Neanderthal was just as human as us, and his stooped appearance was because of arthritis and rickets.
New Guinea Man: Dates back to 1970. This Species has been found in the region just north of Australia.
Cro-Magnon Man: One of the earliest and best established fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man. Cro-Magnon man is indistinguishable from modern humans ... so what's the difference?
Modern Man: This genius thinks he evolved from a monkey.
The press reports that life was created in a laboratory. Craig Venter, PhD, is most famous for his role in being one of the first to sequence the human genome and for his role in creating the first cell with a synthetic genome in 2010. This is heralded as a breakthrough in evolutionary biology, it is Darwinist spin that is never un-spun by the liberal press. Venter's research was pure intelligent design, life was not created in his laboratory. Venter took existing DNA and designed a novel sequence by following the protocol of the DNA code. That is pretty high powered science from Venter's laboratory, but it is not proving evolution by any stretch.
That's how Darwinism works. Disinformation and misinterpretation of the "science" is the main thing that keeps Darwinism alive as a paradigm. In addition they use censorship with abundant fallacies like straw man arguments, but what they do best is... Darwinist blowhards like to throw around ad-hom attacks because they have nothing else to offer other than a bunch of hot air and sketchy "science." It's annoying, but the truth is coming out, it is going to get much darker for Darwinists in the future as the truth unfolds. HELLO NCSE (self proclaimed) your days are numbered.
Recent discussions in the Science forum
|Tesla deliveries, and lost money on every one!||432||9 minutes ago|
|Global warming is the most serious problem of our generation, part 4 (reboot)||6520||34 minutes ago|
|Archaeology Plus Other Fohrbidden Sciences.||867||54 minutes ago|
|Making Better Ice Cubes||127||3 hours ago|
|God vs The Multiverse||99||3 hours ago|
|spherical earth vs. flat earth||3878||4 hours ago|
|GMO Labeling Bill Passed||6||4 hours ago|
|Climate Change and Rising Sea Levels....Why do you guys deny the Science?||124||5 hours ago|
|Frosty Says: Buy a Fur-Lined Jockey Cup!!!||2||7 hours ago|
|Yet Another US Climate Change Poll||38||1 day ago|
|The Science Behind Fetal Pain-related Abortion Legislation||920||1 day ago|
|A question on symmetry||15||1 day ago|