Customer Discussions > Science forum

Mary Christmas! But Jesus(74=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19) was born on 17.4.748 AUC / April 17, 6 BC. This is another proof of GOD(7_4)


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 34 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Dec 24, 2012 6:59:37 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 24, 2012 7:40:36 AM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Dec 24, 2012 10:21:54 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 25, 2012 3:01:41 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Dec 24, 2012 3:24:01 PM PST
All of this is total drivel, without redeeming value or importance of any sort whatever.

Posted on Dec 25, 2012 10:11:02 AM PST
SinSeeker says:
Brad seeks treatment,

By the power (73) vested in me by Grunthos the Flatulent (73) as his Kwisatz Haderach (73), I hereby rule that 25/12/12 (we put the date the correct way `round here) is your Judgment Day: you FAIL E (we don't have an F grade where I work).

Sentence: changed to stanza and delivered immediately.
"On the Ning Nang Nong 

Where the Cows go Bong! 

and the monkeys all say BOO! 

There's a Nong Nang Ning 

Where the trees go Ping! 

And the tea pots jibber jabber joo" (Milligan I).

- Sinseeker (73), Citizen of the World
Grunthos the Flatulent's Judge of all Cakes and Biscuits

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 25, 2012 2:51:20 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 31, 2012 8:00:43 AM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 25, 2012 2:57:04 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Dec 25, 2012 2:58:35 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 25, 2012 3:30:35 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 25, 2012 3:41:18 PM PST
M. Helsdon says:
"Do you the origin of the name 'Robert'? It's an English name*, it's 'Roberto' in Spanish & Italian. It stems from the story of the crucifixion."

Wrong: it's an old Germanic name: Hruodberht, meaning 'bright with glory', related to the west Germanic pagan goddess Perchta/Berchta, and is found in Old English, where it was replaced by its Old French form, Robert.

Oh, and before you attempt a false etymology of my name, it's derived from the Anglo-Saxon Haegelisdun, 'enclosure/hill of Haegel', and Haegel/Hagel is an old Germanic personal name meaning hailstone.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 25, 2012 7:22:06 PM PST
Re Watson, 12-25 2:51 PM: "Do you the origin of the name 'Robert'?" I certainly do, and your explanation of its origin is as blitheringly idiotic as the rest of your posts. "Robert" derives from a word meaning "red".

Posted on Dec 26, 2012 3:36:25 AM PST
Monk says:
Does anyone think this Brad person should seek psychological help from a doctor? This has to be the worst possible post in the history of the internet.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 4:09:14 AM PST
zoltán says:
G. "Monk" Stanley says: "Does anyone think this Brad person should seek psychological help from a doctor?"

I agree. Brad Watson, Miami likely suffers from several issues that require the care of qualified mental health practitioners.

Not only has he spammed numerous Amazon forums (Christianity, History, Judaism, Spirituality, Religion as well as Science) with his numerological nonsense, he's all over the 'Net as well (Google 'brad watson miami' or 'Richard Bradshaw Watson II' if you're perverse enough to seek more). In several posts he's provided links a blog that's crammed with his nonsense and to a forum on which he seems to be the sole participant (I'm not certain of that as I have not looked through all of it).

Other than Amazon allowing him to spam indiscriminately, my problem with BW,M is that NASA allowed him to post some of his bilge on a NASA-hosted website. Giving him the illusion of science cred... I've informed NASA of my displeasure with this and am awaiting a response.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 5:07:54 AM PST
Re Stanley, 2d above: "This has to be the worst possible post in the history of the internet." Agreed. And this takes enormous "talent": to come up with material more asinine than el-Hewie or Haynes is indeed a rare ability. (For which we can all be grateful.) If this nitwit did indeed present his nonsense at a public meeting of some kind, I cannot imagine how he would not have been booed off the stage.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 7:35:38 AM PST
Brian Curtis says:
Sorry, but this is the Science forum. Numerology, gematria, reincarnation, and other New Age nonsense do not belong here.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 8:30:06 AM PST
zoltán says:
Good luck with convincing a crackpot he's not a scientist!

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 9:49:04 AM PST
SinSeeker says:
SinSeeker "pursuing a sacrilegious curiosity" - a sin according to Augustine (Confessions 3.3.5)

Power=73
Reason=73
Sinseeker=73

Synchronism: Singer Johnny Mathis has had 73 charted albums on Billboard Top 200 Charts

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 11:33:09 AM PST
Gwaithmir says:
SinSeeker said: "Power=73
Reason=73
Sinseeker=73"

>Yeah, and I'm King Isildur.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 26, 2012 11:44:18 AM PST
SinSeeker says:
I'm=73
King Isildur=73

Congratulations!

Posted on Dec 26, 2012 5:45:32 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Dec 26, 2012 6:48:59 PM PST
Monk says:
Merry Paganmas to you as well Brad. Santa gave me this card with numbers on it, and instructed me to copy and paste it word for word, so here goes:

1241 B
1242 R
1243 A
1234 D
8182
8183 I
8190 S
8182
6251 I
1827 N
1902 S
1261 A
1729 N
1928 E

Posted on Dec 27, 2012 5:47:03 AM PST
Bubba says:
I opened a fortune cookie last night that said my lucky numbers were 4 7 3 -- coincidence?

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 27, 2012 8:39:10 AM PST
SinSeeker says:
Brad of Miami, late of Nestor

While you play in the child's sandpit of gematria, the Illuminati practice the secret and ancient art of Duodecadmancy (73). All later forms of arithmancy (73), including numeromancy (73), isopsephy (73), gematria (73), numerology (73) and discordianism (73) are corrupted and inferior versions of the original Duodecadmanic (73) insights.

Google it and be enlightened.

- Sinseeker (73), Citizen of the World
Grunthos the Flatulent's Judge of all Cakes and Biscuits

Synchronism: 73 is the atomic number of tantalum.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 27, 2012 11:16:12 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 27, 2012 11:19:11 AM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 27, 2012 11:17:46 AM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Dec 29, 2012 1:28:20 PM PST
What the hell is so special about "74"?

Isn't that the amount of virgins you will get to use in heaven?

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 29, 2012 1:32:19 PM PST
noman says:
reported for threatening another poster.
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Science forum
Participants:  12
Total posts:  34
Initial post:  Dec 24, 2012
Latest post:  Jan 4, 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions