Unlike proper scientific hypotheses, Naturalisitc Abiogenisis cant be falsified.
You can try and try and fail and fail, as has been done, but this will never PROVE its false
That brings up a question
If you still believe in Naturalistic Abiogenisis, after 100 years of failure,
how many more years of experimental failure will destroy your belief?
And here's a related question.
If you still believe in Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, after 10 years of failure to find them,
how many more years of failure will destroy your belief?
Recent discussions in the Science forum
|Global warming is the most serious problem of our generation part 2||7151||9 minutes ago|
|It's time to send Richard Kepler permantly to the penalty box.||305||10 minutes ago|
|Origin of Life For Real||701||11 minutes ago|
|Freeze Warning: brace for denialist stupidity||149||1 hour ago|
|Creationists ask....Is this how Science works?||18||1 hour ago|
|solar wind reversal and magnetosphere||10||1 hour ago|
|NYT: CO2 & Matthew Fontaine Maury||2||2 hours ago|
|Bangs Don't Produce Law And Order||155||3 hours ago|
|Why?||83||4 hours ago|
|Galilean relativity||2204||4 hours ago|
|What (who if you insist) is God?||164||5 hours ago|
|The Origins Of Life||5796||6 hours ago|