I wish to present a challenge to the Intelligent Design supporters on this forum. Since clearly one of the biggest problems in discussions of the subject is the lack of clear definitions for the terms used, I propose (or more accurately challenge) proponents to do three things here in this forum.
1) provide a definition of the terms of intelligent design.
These terms that require a definition include (but may not be limited to) "irreducible complexity" and "design".
2) Provide a statement of the theory of intelligent design.
3) use the above statement to make a scientific prediction.
Quoting form external sources is legitimate as long as the link is provided, (ie, no plagiarizing). Expect the definitions, statement of the theory, and prediction(s) to be held to a scientific standard. For example, to meet my challenge a statement must follow the logical structure of a scientific theory. In short, if you want it to be treated as science, present as science.
Recent discussions in the Science forum
|Global warming is the most serious problem of our generation, part 4 (reboot)||6521||9 minutes ago|
|Tesla deliveries, and lost money on every one!||433||2 hours ago|
|Archaeology Plus Other Fohrbidden Sciences.||868||2 hours ago|
|Making Better Ice Cubes||127||7 hours ago|
|God vs The Multiverse||99||7 hours ago|
|spherical earth vs. flat earth||3878||8 hours ago|
|GMO Labeling Bill Passed||6||9 hours ago|
|Climate Change and Rising Sea Levels....Why do you guys deny the Science?||124||9 hours ago|
|Frosty Says: Buy a Fur-Lined Jockey Cup!!!||2||11 hours ago|
|Yet Another US Climate Change Poll||38||1 day ago|
|The Science Behind Fetal Pain-related Abortion Legislation||920||1 day ago|
|A question on symmetry||15||2 days ago|