Customer Discussions > Science forum

Freud, Marx and Darwin


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 54 posts in this discussion
Initial post: May 7, 2012 1:24:11 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 7, 2012 2:24:29 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 7, 2012 2:25:26 PM PDT
Rev. Otter says:
not seeing anything about Freud, Marx, or Darwin in your post, my curiousity made me follow the link provided.

i honestly have no clue what your rambling, disconnected blog is about, so i'm going to close this page now.

best of luck with whatever it is you're trying to say. :)

In reply to an earlier post on May 7, 2012 2:52:24 PM PDT
otter

maybe cleo is off on a new tangent now

In reply to an earlier post on May 7, 2012 4:02:04 PM PDT
"Read it on line at http://30145.myauthorsite.com/"

Nope. Too much unedited verbiage. If you want to make a point, please do so. No one's going to read all that stuff.

Posted on May 7, 2012 4:07:21 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 7, 2012 4:29:59 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 7, 2012 6:10:11 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 7, 2012 6:23:15 PM PDT
tom kriske says:
maybe a haynes jockstrap?

no, seriously dude, there is something i don't get - if ignorance is bliss, how come you're so angry?

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 7:15:52 AM PDT
Christopher Haynes has a one man show to contribute to Americas scientific decline. With Freud, Marx, Darwin and Einstein in his sights, I wonder what he has against German speaking Jews.

Regards

John

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 9:03:48 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 9:10:32 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 8, 2012 9:11:44 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 8, 2012 10:16:53 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 8, 2012 10:32:34 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 8, 2012 11:01:32 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 8, 2012 11:28:13 AM PDT
Rev. Otter says:
crud, i'm out of popcorn.

brb.

Posted on May 8, 2012 12:28:37 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 8, 2012 12:32:46 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 12:35:00 PM PDT
Bertha

Freud has been thoroughly discredited by the majority of Anglo-American Psychiatrist/Psychologists. Marxism has been thoroughly discredited by reality. Both were not scientists, although Freud believed himself to be one.

To attempt lumping Darwin in with them is the same old creationist nonsense. Darwin was a scientist and there has been absolutely no evidence that evolution is not fact. All the legislatures trying to allow criticize Darwin are not spurred by science because no one has put forth a rival scientific theory, only religious ideas.

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 12:36:14 PM PDT
Bertha

I don't think the claim is appropriate, Darwin wasn't jewish.

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 12:36:51 PM PDT
Bertha

Why would it matter?

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 1:03:03 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 8, 2012 1:16:26 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 8, 2012 1:18:08 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 1:17:52 PM PDT
Bertha

What is your alternative to evolution?

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 1:18:10 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 1:30:12 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 8, 2012 1:31:52 PM PDT
Rev. Otter says:
these pretzels are making me thirsty!

Posted on May 8, 2012 1:42:10 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 8, 2012 1:44:36 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 8, 2012 1:45:59 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 8, 2012 1:45:58 PM PDT
Bertha

What scientists are suggesting that there are rational, purposeful adaptations?
‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Science forum
Participants:  17
Total posts:  54
Initial post:  May 7, 2012
Latest post:  May 28, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions