The first part of the second Amendment does not invalidate the second part.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The first part just gives a reason why the people have the right. The second part says it cannot be infringed. So even if we don't have militias, there still cannot be a law that infringes the right. As DVvM said, the Supreme Court came to this decision, as is their power to do so, so that is the law of the land. For all intents and purposes on the legal front, this argument has been laid to rest unless a future Supreme Court overturns the decision, which is unlikely to happen any time soon.
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|Steam sale: Whadya bouyin'?||74||52 minutes ago|
|In Praise of Sodom D. Snow||17||1 hour ago|
|Welcome Back, D. Snow||70||1 hour ago|
|Amazon metrics show that shoppers are heavily favoring PS4, while Xbox One games get left in the dust||305||1 hour ago|
|Scorpio is 18 months away. Until then, XBox One is still a slow disappointing piece of chit||42||2 hours ago|
|Microsoft's Xbox One Is Selling So Poorly Retailers Are Getting Desperate||706||2 hours ago|
|Microsoft and their console||12||2 hours ago|
|OT: I upgraded from iPhone to Galaxy and I'm so glad I did||106||2 hours ago|
|Xbox One S Is Not 40% Smaller. Microsoft Caught In A Lie And More False Advertising.||10||2 hours ago|
|PS NEO is still a PS4||56||2 hours ago|
|Destiny VGF Clan v6.0||3865||3 hours ago|
|playstation neo migh be more powerful than you think||6||3 hours ago|