Winter Driving Best Books of the Month Men's Leather Watches Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon $5 Albums All-New Amazon Fire TV Beauty V-Day Amethyst Jewelry Create an Amazon Wedding Registry Amazon Gift Card Offer jstfd6 jstfd6 jstfd6  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 Kindle Voyage Shop Now SnS
Customer Discussions > Video Games forum

CVG looks at the Vita's first year


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 51-75 of 79 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:21:39 AM PST
Hah! I miss Pebbles.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:23:26 AM PST
GarionOrb says:
Remember Nintendo also removed backwards compatibility...from both the DS and the Wii, and the complaints were barely noticed. Sony removes BC and suddenly they're the worst company imaginable and the Vita and PS3 are utter garbage. Double-standard much?

And the entire gaming universe were calling for Sony to abandon the UMD since it was first introduced. Sony does just that, and suddenly everyone's appalled that Sony had the gall to do what people wanted.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:26:20 AM PST
D_Strasse says:
She was harmless, but some didn't like all those threads and took it out her.

I thought that was kinda rough, as she obviously had social skill problems and was pretty naive.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:30:46 AM PST
Coffee says:
I thought the Wii removal was just in Europe and newer consols sold uner the "Family Edition"? My Wii plays Gamecube games still.... and the DS is and always was backwards compatable?

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:32:58 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 19, 2012 11:36:32 AM PST
"and the DS is and always was backwards compatable?"

I think he's referring to the DSi losing the GBA slot. The flaw in the logic is that the DSLite is still available brand new from Nintendo, unlike the PS3 which hasn't had BC in any models since 2008.

Edited for correctness.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:35:56 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 19, 2012 11:36:13 AM PST
"the PS3 which hasn't had BC in any models since 2007."

umm...late 2008

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:36:41 AM PST
D_Strasse says:
OK, but who's buying Lites? And why the heck is Nintendo still making them; are they?

I think it's a pretty fair statement to say that BC is included in release models but is decontented later as pricing comes down.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:37:53 AM PST
You can still buy a Lite brand new from any retailer. People that value BC can buy a Lite, people that don't can buy a DSi.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:39:27 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 19, 2012 11:39:50 AM PST
what if I "Really" value BC but really want a DSi?

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:40:11 AM PST
Coffee says:
"I think it's a pretty fair statement to say that BC is included in release models but is decontented later as pricing comes down."

I would agree with that statement. It makes sense to remove the BC once the gaming library increases a bit, and you don't need the extra titles to bolster your gaming selection. Early on it's a strong selling point for a new console/handheld to say "Play these new games! Oh and you can play all of the existing ones as well!"

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:40:38 AM PST
"Remember Nintendo also removed backwards compatibility...from both the DS and the Wii, and the complaints were barely noticed. Sony removes BC and suddenly they're the worst company imaginable and the Vita and PS3 are utter garbage. Double-standard much?"

But the first models of those systems offered BC (which is exactly what I wrote in the post you are responding to.) No, Sony is not the worst company imaginable (nobody is saying that) but I can't imagine that sitting here with shelves of UMD games that can't be played on Vita is a selling point. No double standards here.

"And the entire gaming universe were calling for Sony to abandon the UMD since it was first introduced. Sony does just that, and suddenly everyone's appalled that Sony had the gall to do what people wanted. "

Which just goes to show that Sony should never have gone with the UMD format in the first place (in fairness that is said with the benefit of hindsight.) However, it is not the customer's fault that Sony doesn't like their UMD format anymore and Sony should have thrown us some kind of bone like the Passport program or a UMD buy-back system.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:41:08 AM PST
D_Strasse says:
I guess I don't understand why Nintendo is still making them. That seems like a retarded business decision to me. SKU quantity isn't free, so what's the point of keeping a SKU around that is selling in the teens?

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:41:35 AM PST
Then you've got a problem, but you can buy a new DS with GBA BC, you cannot buy a new PS3 or Vita with BC.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:42:45 AM PST
Must be selling enough. Nintendo isn't stupid, they aren't going to keep an old system in their sales mix that is not profitable.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:45:00 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 19, 2012 11:48:46 AM PST
I have my BC (two of them - 60gb and 80gb) PS3s....Im not in the market for a BC PS3. Heck, I cant remember the last time i actually used my PS3 to play PS2 or PS1 disc based games.

I bought my Vita for Vita Games mainly. So anything and everything else is just a bonus. that be Cross Controller, Cross Buy, PS Mobile, Minis, PCE, PS1, Remote Play, etc.

I also kept my PSone, my two PS2s and my two PSPs...so Im ok

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:45:54 AM PST
The Family Edition and Wii Mini (introduced five and six years into the Wii lifecycle) do not offer BC.

The DS and DS Lite have GBA BC. The DSi (released 4-5 years into the DS lifecycle) does not offer GBA BC.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:47:28 AM PST
I was only making the point that the two situations are not necessarily exactly comparable. I don't really use BC on my home consoles either.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:50:18 AM PST
fair point.

I really hope that Sony allows PS2 and PSN games on the PSV. That would be AWESOME!!!

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:51:58 AM PST
Hell yes, I play a lot of PS1 games on the Vita, I'd love to have PS2 games as well.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:53:51 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 19, 2012 11:54:08 AM PST
D_Strasse says:
PS2 games would be problematic in that many use both triggers. Need to map L1/R1 somewhere not goofy.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:54:33 AM PST
I played God of War 1 remote play with L2/R2 mapped to the back touchpad, and though it wasn't perfect, I got used to it.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:54:48 AM PST
back touch pad does work well for that

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 11:57:15 AM PST
Its [Vita] great for PS1 games and will work well for PS2 and PSN games. Oh well...if it never happens

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 12:05:03 PM PST
GarionOrb says:
"Which just goes to show that Sony should never have gone with the UMD format in the first place"

Why harp on this now? Sony didn't know what media the future PS Vita would use when they designed the PSP.

"However, it is not the customer's fault that Sony doesn't like their UMD format anymore"

Actually, the customers were the ones who hated UMD's.

"and Sony should have thrown us some kind of bone like the Passport program or a UMD buy-back system."

Yes, this I agree with.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2012 12:09:11 PM PST
"Why harp on this now? Sony didn't know what media the future PS Vita would use when they designed the PSP."

It's not so much harping as it is that it's important to make sure your roadmap is in line with your future vision. By going with UMDs in the first place Sony made things very difficult for themselves when the next generation handheld was in development. I am positive that Sony's engineers knew the flaws of the UMD and that the future was leaning more towards flash media and digital distribution.

"Actually, the customers were the ones who hated UMD's."

Yes, but UMDs were what we got and those of us who supported Sony by purchasing UMDs got left out in the cold. That's not good business nor is it a selling point.
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the Video Games forum

  Discussion Replies Latest Post
New Nintendo Selects titles 13 8 minutes ago
NECA Toys confirms that Sony's bringing Crash Bandicoot back 7 8 minutes ago
What's your favorite Sega console? 53 19 minutes ago
OT: The Last Witch Hunter sucks 4 19 minutes ago
OT: looks like whoever closed out the main OT got banned spamming it to death so I guess this is the new main OT 2335 21 minutes ago
OT: A great man, Antonin Scalia, has passed away 90 22 minutes ago
How many systems do you have? 78 27 minutes ago
12 Games in 12 Months 2015-2016 edition 395 28 minutes ago
January 2016 NPD 101 33 minutes ago
What's your favorite ps4 exclusive so far? 42 54 minutes ago
Do you go into video games blind or with a strategy? 3 56 minutes ago
What would the price of PS VR have to be for you to buy it? 19 57 minutes ago
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Video Games forum
Participants:  26
Total posts:  79
Initial post:  Dec 17, 2012
Latest post:  Dec 19, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions