"History is just the record of what happened in the past. The Bible gives a specific record of events,"
...Both of which are to have happened in the past, correct? How is this different from history again?
"I have a code that I go by to determine what morality is."
But since this is only a belief you've accepted (and not truth, as you've admitted before) - You therefore admit that it could be a fallacy, just the same as one mans moral compass (apart from religion) can be different from anothers....Correct? It seems as if both viewpoints are a result of (subjective) common sense if viewed in this way, therefore to proclaim that common sense cannot be used to determine morality is to exclude all viewpoints.
It's either all or nothing, you can't pick the Bible out and say "B..B...But it's the only proponent of true morality!" without invalidating the opposition - apart from it.