We all know about the publisher drama and "bribes" and whatever the internet comes up with. But there is ONE thing that is persistent and is always present in video game reviews but big websites: The fact that the reviewer never bought the game in the first place.
As a consumer, I'd expect my $60 to be worth the purchase and get some quality entertainment from the game. On the other hand, the reviewer received a free copy of said game and probably never had big expectations from it, since they didn't spend a dime to buy it. They also never have buyers remorse, which is a common thing among gamers. They can give a game a huge score just because they can, and because they are reviewing a product they played for FREE.
Just my thoughts on the matter :)
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|Women As Reward - A Response From Liana K||216||1 second ago|
|Borderlands Getting Backwards Compatibility on Xbox One||15||1 second ago|
|OT: Non-Inbred Kentucky Clerk Ordered Jailed For Refusing To Issue Gay Marriage License||24||47 seconds ago|
|Scalebound: everything we know about the Xbox One exclusive so far.||8||50 seconds ago|
|Microsoft Caught Paying Media For Positive Xbox One Reviews! FTC Involved And Disiplinary Action Incoming.||93||1 minute ago|
|Semi OT Goku fights the entire SF2 crew||0||2 minutes ago|
|Street Fighter V now available on GMG, PC beta confirmed to come with pre-order.||1||3 minutes ago|
|Stein;Gate - Has this VN interested anyone?||20||5 minutes ago|
|Will Uncharted 4 have as many microtransactions as Naughty Dog's last two games?||55||6 minutes ago|
|Deus Ex: Mankind Divided launches February 23, 2016||19||8 minutes ago|
|Anyone getting Elder Scrolls Online next week?||1105||10 minutes ago|
|TMNT Turtles In Time re-Shelled||12||11 minutes ago|