We all know about the publisher drama and "bribes" and whatever the internet comes up with. But there is ONE thing that is persistent and is always present in video game reviews but big websites: The fact that the reviewer never bought the game in the first place.
As a consumer, I'd expect my $60 to be worth the purchase and get some quality entertainment from the game. On the other hand, the reviewer received a free copy of said game and probably never had big expectations from it, since they didn't spend a dime to buy it. They also never have buyers remorse, which is a common thing among gamers. They can give a game a huge score just because they can, and because they are reviewing a product they played for FREE.
Just my thoughts on the matter :)
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|OT: $%^& you Amazon||63||53 seconds ago|
|Phil Spencer congratulates Sony & Naughty Dog on Uncharted 4||30||1 minute ago|
|Destiny VGF Clan v5.0||7457||2 minutes ago|
|Anyone else think that Uncharted is lame?||127||2 minutes ago|
|Honest question about the Ratchet and Clank movie||3||3 minutes ago|
|Nioh - Alpha demo impressions||123||5 minutes ago|
|The Legend of Zelda, Space Invaders, and Sonic highlight World Video Game Hall of Fame's 2016 inductees||15||9 minutes ago|
|Uncharted 4 Review Roundup||339||9 minutes ago|
|The Next Battlefield Is Called Battlefield 1, Set In Alternate History WW1||8||12 minutes ago|
|Weekend gaming 05/06 - 05/08: Cruz camp insider reveals would-be nominee pulled plug on campaign to have time to play Uncharted 4. Trump mocks decision stating Cruz likes "...garbage games such as Destiny, his taste is terrible and should be ashamed.".||39||13 minutes ago|
|OT: Coconut Water||60||17 minutes ago|
|Anyone still playing the Division?||33||17 minutes ago|