We all know about the publisher drama and "bribes" and whatever the internet comes up with. But there is ONE thing that is persistent and is always present in video game reviews but big websites: The fact that the reviewer never bought the game in the first place.
As a consumer, I'd expect my $60 to be worth the purchase and get some quality entertainment from the game. On the other hand, the reviewer received a free copy of said game and probably never had big expectations from it, since they didn't spend a dime to buy it. They also never have buyers remorse, which is a common thing among gamers. They can give a game a huge score just because they can, and because they are reviewing a product they played for FREE.
Just my thoughts on the matter :)
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|Don't Expect to See Too Many More PS4 HD Remasters of PS3 Games (Sony were right, and wrong.)||37||34 seconds ago|
|Target Ad: Destiny $19.99, The Order: 1886 $19.99, Elder Scrolls Online $39.99||19||1 minute ago|
|EA Predicts 49 Million PS4/Xbox One Combined by End of 2015; 38.8 Million PS4 10.1 Million Xboners||21||1 minute ago|
|kinda OT: Who do you think could make a decent "Predator" sequel???||30||3 minutes ago|
|OT: So Planned Parenthood.||340||4 minutes ago|
|I Just Had An (Sad) Epiphany...||42||11 minutes ago|
|MGS 5: The Phantom Pain costing Konami over $80m ...||41||16 minutes ago|
|Smite Developer Announces Team-Based Strategic FPS for Xbox One/PC called Paladins||0||16 minutes ago|
|OT: I'm a Teacher!||32||16 minutes ago|
|Metal Gear Online Delayed Until October for Consoles, January for the PC||2||19 minutes ago|
|Street Fighter V: Vega Reveal Trailer||6||20 minutes ago|
|Thank you for your support of Amazon Discussion Forums.||9||20 minutes ago|