We all know about the publisher drama and "bribes" and whatever the internet comes up with. But there is ONE thing that is persistent and is always present in video game reviews but big websites: The fact that the reviewer never bought the game in the first place.
As a consumer, I'd expect my $60 to be worth the purchase and get some quality entertainment from the game. On the other hand, the reviewer received a free copy of said game and probably never had big expectations from it, since they didn't spend a dime to buy it. They also never have buyers remorse, which is a common thing among gamers. They can give a game a huge score just because they can, and because they are reviewing a product they played for FREE.
Just my thoughts on the matter :)
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|Bloodborne Tips & Tricks||32||19 seconds ago|
|VGF Official Bloodborne Thread (Expect Spoilers)||840||2 minutes ago|
|Zelda Wii U Delayed||0||4 minutes ago|
|The hidden cost of Xbox One||24||5 minutes ago|
|Weekend Gaming: 3/27 - 3/29||8||8 minutes ago|
|Dan Stapleton from IGN getting ripped a new one over a Bloodborne opinion article...read the comments!!!||213||8 minutes ago|
|you're better off buying a PS4 if you care about these exclusive titles. If you care about the non-exclusive titles, you're better off buying an Xbox One because it's cheaper.||80||14 minutes ago|
|A Few VG Deals on Amazon just in case you missed them...||11||14 minutes ago|
|So, Diablo 4||7||15 minutes ago|
|XBox One's April update FINALLY adds voice messaging||13||20 minutes ago|
|OT: What Are You Listening To-2015 Version!||354||25 minutes ago|
|Anyone have or is familar with GoPro video cameras?||12||26 minutes ago|