We all know about the publisher drama and "bribes" and whatever the internet comes up with. But there is ONE thing that is persistent and is always present in video game reviews but big websites: The fact that the reviewer never bought the game in the first place.
As a consumer, I'd expect my $60 to be worth the purchase and get some quality entertainment from the game. On the other hand, the reviewer received a free copy of said game and probably never had big expectations from it, since they didn't spend a dime to buy it. They also never have buyers remorse, which is a common thing among gamers. They can give a game a huge score just because they can, and because they are reviewing a product they played for FREE.
Just my thoughts on the matter :)
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|Insomniac Games talks about Spider-Man PS4 exclusivity, no plans for Sunset Overdrive 2||2||6 minutes ago|
|OT: Conservatives Hurt the Economy Once Again: Global stocks tumble after Britain votes to leave the EU||34||16 minutes ago|
|Snowflake's (D. Snow) Necrobumping||90||16 minutes ago|
|OT: Independence Day: Resurgence is a critical bomb||2||17 minutes ago|
|CDC Study on Gun Violence DESTROYS Obama's New Gun Control Push||62||21 minutes ago|
|OT: My Fame: An Update||2||24 minutes ago|
|OT: I upgraded from iPhone to Galaxy and I'm so glad I did||104||36 minutes ago|
|Amazon sell out of Halo Wars 2 Ultimate Edition/ Skyrim Special Edition (Remaster)||5||36 minutes ago|
|Xbox One S Is Not 40% Smaller. Microsoft Caught In A Lie And More False Advertising.||7||47 minutes ago|
|God of War's Gameplay Trailer Is The Most Watched E3 Video on YouTube; Dev: It's Crazy.||2||47 minutes ago|
|Microsoft and their console||11||1 hour ago|
|PSN flash sale incoming today||82||1 hour ago|