CarLustBlog.com's Amazon Blog

 
« Go to CarLustBlog.com's full Amazon Blog

Car Lust--Fiat X1/9

9:29 AM PDT, October 25, 2007
The Fiat X1/9 was never a great car; at best, at its introduction in the mid-1970s, it was a novel styling exercise and a miracle in packaging that yielded a tiny mid-engined sports car with the agile handling to match its excellent weight distribution.

By the standards of 1974, the X1/9 was not a fast car, running only about as quickly as the bog-slow standard family sedan of the time. When the car was discontinued in 1988, wearing a Bertone badge in honor of its designer following Fiat's pull-out from the American market, it was one of the slowest cars on the market, neck and neck with low-grade economy sedans and base-model minivans.

The 1974 edition ran 0-60 in a halfway respectable 11.0 seconds (respectable by the standards of the time, anyway), but by 1976 tightening emissions standards had caused the Fiat to fade to 14.0 seconds--an eternity in virtually any era.

What the X1/9 always had going for it, though, was style. Mid-engined cars are a novelty even today; in the 1970s, they were the stuff of exotica. With its extravagantly wedgy profile, intimate seating arrangements, and trim, tidy proportions, the X1/9 perfectly captured the time and looks sharp and contemporary even today.

Nowadays, you can find ratty old X1/9s behind gas stations, parked in alleys, and in fields--their marvelous designer lines left to slowly (or rapidly, as the case may be) rust away into nothingness.

I'm sorely tempted to nab one and fix it up to have my own boutique mid-engined, two-seat sports car, but Fiat's legendary unreliability, expensive parts, and typically casual 1970s approach to rust-proofing would probably make even a free X1/9 a very expensive proposition.

Someday, perhaps.

The international appeal of the X1/9 is displayed by the fact that these photos are courtesy of www.peterboehi.com, a German-language site that discusses his love of quirky cars and Fiats in particular. This is just more proof that Car Lust transcends national and linguistic barriers.

--Chris H.

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-7 of 7 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 25, 2007 10:56 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 25, 2007 10:57 AM PDT
 M. Errold Lyon says:
"legendary unreliability" and "expensive parts"? I had a '74 X-1/9. It had been abandoned at a repair shop and reposessed by the bank.

It had about 60,000 miles on it then. I gave it away (to a high school shop class as a project car) 11 years later with 170,000 miles on it.

Over that time, I spent about $300 on repairs. That's not bad! I doubt any car I'll have will do better, even adjusting for inflation.

And it was a lot of fun to drive - partly because it didn't have enough power to get out of its own way. At least you could wind it up a bit and run it through the gears without being seriously illegal! In some ways 0-60 in 11 seconds using three gears is more like driving than 0-6 in 4 seconds in first gear!

Okay, I won't argue about the rust.

Posted on Oct 25, 2007 12:14 PM PDT
 Aric Annear says:
Ah, yes..the "Doorstop". I came *this* close to buying a pristine black '81 last year but didn't move fast enough...you can find a few around here in Seattle and they're usually not too pricey.

Legendary unreliability? You must have never owned an Austin Healy. :)

Posted on Oct 26, 2007 12:00 PM PDT
 Skiwilly says:
I had two X1/9s. My first was a 1974 model. Witha little work they were real sleepers. After porting, polishing, balancing, and ccint the heads, adding twin 42mm DCNF Weber carbs and a Cam I was blowing the doors off celica GTs at stop lights. It was great to see the drivers face, in my rear view mirror. It was also relatively reliable and a great autocross car.

My second was a 1979 1500 model. I didn't do as much work on it but still loved driving it. the key, as with all small displacement engines is to keep it wound up. I still do that with the WRX I have now. I finally sold the '79 in 2003 when I bought the WRX. I had rebuilt the whole thing. THe engine was again balanced, ported, polished, lightened flywheel. I made it to SCCA Solo II national twice with that car. No real rust problems and parts I thought parts were reasonable. I sure wish the kid I sold it to hadn't trashed it.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 12:44 PM PDT
M. Errold Lyon said:
Over that time, I spent about $300 on repairs. That's not bad! I doubt any car I'll have will do better, even adjusting for inflation.

---

Yup. Fiats are legendarily unreliable, but frankly I still lust after them because I can't be convinced they're *that* bad. People drive them, they work. You just have to take care of them and realize you're not driving a 2004 Civic.

Lyon: And it was a lot of fun to drive - partly because it didn't have enough power to get out of its own way.

I couldn't agree more. It's a long-established truth that it's more fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow. My best time behind the wheel came in a thoroughly clapped-out 1983 Honda Prelude - a friend's car, with a completely knackered five-speed - that I pushed to 11/10ths on a twisty mountain road with my friends inside.

Driving that car at - or beyond - the limit on that twisty road was far more breathtaking than trundling along at the same speed in a Corvette Z06 would have been.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 12:44 PM PDT
Aric said: Legendary unreliability? You must have never owned an Austin Healy. :)

No, I haven't - and I give thanks every day!

:-)

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 26, 2007 12:46 PM PDT
Skiwilly, you've just entirely summed up why I think having an X1/9 would be a thrill. Blasting around in what is basically a go-kart just has to be fun. Autocrossing the X1/9 would be a blast.

Posted on Oct 26, 2007 1:48 PM PDT
 Anthony Cagle says:
That's funny, I just saw one on my way back from lunch (Seattle).
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
 
RSS Feed for CarLustBlog.com     

Bio

Yes, Amazon.com has an Auto Parts store--and now we have a blog, too. For the most part, though, this blog won't be about parts--it'll be about cars, and frankly I think you should know what you're dealing with.

This isn't a car news or review blog; there are plenty of those out there already that do a good job. I'm also going to make no pretense of fairness, objectivity, or expertise.

This is simply a place for me to share my love (and disgust) of some cars with you. I'll admit up-front that some of my tastes are, um, quirky. But, whether you agree or disagree, I'm eager to hear from you.

You see, I have a horrible sickness, a plague that has cost me huge sums of money and time - an addiction that has only intensified as I have fed my need.

That sickness is a lifelong love of all things automotive that has hopelessly distorted my whole life - from a room full of thousands of car magazines at home, to boxes of old Matchbox cars, to haphazardly built models of cars with glue smeared on the windshield, to a parade of worthless cars I've owned and loved. I'm a hopeless addict.

Come join me in my addiction.

--Chris H.



Where's My Stuff?

Shipping & Returns

Need Help?

Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates