Profile for Raven A. Wind > Reviews


Raven A. Wind's Profile

Customer Reviews: 468
Top Reviewer Ranking: 235
Helpful Votes: 5439

Community Features
Review Discussion Boards
Top Reviewers

Guidelines: Learn more about the ins and outs of Your Profile.

Reviews Written by
Raven A. Wind RSS Feed (Michigan)

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11-20
Powerwarehouse Epson ELPLP78 Projector Lamp replacement by Powerwarehouse - Premium Powerwarehouse Replacement Lamp
Powerwarehouse Epson ELPLP78 Projector Lamp replacement by Powerwarehouse - Premium Powerwarehouse Replacement Lamp
Offered by Powerwarehouse
Price: $320.00

1.0 out of 5 stars More than 3X more expensive than ordering from Epson directly., April 14, 2014
I love my Epson EX7220, but this ELPLP78 lamp is selling here for over three hundred bucks, while Epson sells the official ELPLP78 directly for ninety-nine bucks. I fail to see how this one is worth more than three times the OEM price. My advice? Shop around.

Roku 3500R Streaming Stick (HDMI) (2014)
Roku 3500R Streaming Stick (HDMI) (2014)
Price: $49.00
24 used & new from $45.99

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Almost Roku's Top Device, April 13, 2014
First, some background: I have had Roku devices since the company released their first one years ago. I've upgraded through every generation, as well as using other streaming devices from other companies. I know my way around cord-cutting, as I've been off cable and terrestrial television for about 5 years now.

Now, on to the review...


Yes, I'll stand by this statement. Roku has taken all the best things about their devices and compacted it into a stick that takes up minimal space, has varying options for power sources, and works better than anything at this price point... But that doesn't mean it's perfect. Let's get into the meat of the situation and talk about why their best effort is still short in a few places, and why that shouldn't (or should) matter to you.

The obvious starting conversation here is "should I get Roku Streaming Stick or the Roku 1, since they're both about the same price?" and the answer is a bit more complex than a simple yes or no.

▼ User Interface: The Roku Streaming Stick for HDMI has the same basic user interface as the Roku 1. It seems to be a tiny bit quicker in menus, but it's really not a noticeable difference as far as I'm concerned. The Netflix app is slightly different, but that comes down to personal preference as I can't say one or the other is better; both Netflix interfaces have their merits and their negatives. Most other apps are identical on all Roku devices.

▼ Remote Control: Here's where we hit the first stumbling block for the Roku Streaming Stick. While the Roku 1 supports an IR remote, the Streaming Stick only supports RF. What this means is that if you use a universal remote control, such as Logitech's Harmony series, you will NOT be able to control the Roku Streaming Stick with it. You will be stuck using the Roku Streaming Stick's included remote.

This would not be a problem for most people, but when you're used to an elegant and well-made remote, the Roku Streaming Stick's remote is a huge step down. It's fat, heavy, has odd button placement (why is the "OK" button UNDER the control cross on this, but in the middle on the Roku 1? I much preferred the button in the middle of the cross), has direct buttons for MGo, Netflix, Vudu, and Amazon (which is great if you use all of these, but wastes space if you don't), and of course it lacks controls for other devices like your TV, receiver, or soundbar.

The Roku 1, on the other hand, supports IR input, which means it works perfectly with Logitech's Harmony Remotes. If this is important to you, then you may want to avoid the Roku Streaming Stick. If you plan to use a universal remote in the future, you may want to stick with Roku 1, 2, or 3.

Granted, you can always use the Roku App for Android or iOS on your tablet or phone, but that's not exactly an improvement. The remote app still doesn't control volume or any TV/Audio functions, and additionally ends up draining battery from your phone or tablet. It's a tiny patch for a very big hole. It's also worth noting that the iOS version is for iPhone/iPod touch, and will be blown-up and a bit ugly on an iPad, since Roku hasn't bothered to make a universal version yet.

By the way, you know what's really annoying? When you're in the middle of a movie or show, and you accidentally hit one of the four instant-access buttons at the bottom of the remote (MGo, Amazon, Netflix, Vudu) -- You are instantly popped out of your video and taken to the other channel. I think they should consider an "are you sure?" prompt... Or sell a remote without these buttons!

▼ Heat: There is no doubt about the fact that the Roku Streaming Stick gets hot. The Roku 1 doesn't. This is to be expected when you're dealing with electronics packed into a tiny space, but it remains to be seen whether or not the hotter-running leads to shorter life. The jury's still out on this one.

▼ Power Options: The Roku Streaming Stick MAY work using power solely from your HDTV's HDMI port. This seems to me more common in 2013 model televisions and later, while older HDTVs don't output much power from the HDMI port at all. This means that the Roku Stick must be powered using the included USB cable. For most people, it's a simple matter of connecting to the USB port on your HDTV. For some people who bought cheaper TVs (Element, Sanyo, Emerson, RCA, etc.) there is often no USB port available, and as such these folks will be forced to run the USB cable to the AC brick, and plug into a standard wall outlet.

However, consider that the Roku 1 (and all other models) require using the wall outlet. Period. There is no option for USB power in other Roku models, and as such the Streaming Stick is simply more versatile when it comes to giving it power.

▼ Local Media Connectivity: There are no USB ports, or additional inputs on either the Roku 1 or the Roku Streaming Stick. If you want the USB port, you're stuck getting the Roku 3. Personally, I think it's not worth it because Roku handles local media so poorly. You're far better off getting a dedicated device for local media, such as the mid-range Micca players. Most devices, like the Roku or game consoles, that try to do many things at once tend to fail at the local media by limiting the size, format, container, or codecs of the media files you wish to play.

Essentially, local media is limited on the Roku 1 and Roku Streaming Stick to a network server, such as the EXCELLENT Plex Media Server and it's accompanying app for Roku. I think most people who keep their PC on all the time will be pleased with Plex as their local media source.

▼ Video Connectivity: The Roku Streaming Stick is obviously HDMI only. If your TV is old, you won't be able to use the Roku Streaming Stick very well or at all, and you really should go for the Roku 1 (or other Roku models), which all support AV connections.

▼ Audio Connectivity: The Roku Streaming Stick supports 5.1 audio via HDMI. For those of you with receivers, you would just plug the Roku Streaming Stick directing into your receiver, and then output via HDMI to your TV, monitor, or projector. Your receiver should be able to decode the 5.1 audio from your Roku Stick without a problem. Just make sure you go into Roku Settings and set the audio for Surround Sound instead of Stereo!

The Roku 1 also supports HDMI 5.1, as well as supporting standard RCA red/white stereo and Dolby audio. If your receiver is old and doesn't have HDMI input, then you have no choice: You will NOT be able to get audio from the Streaming Stick and must choose the Roku 1, 2, or 3.

The same applies to soundbars. The Roku Streaming Stick will not output optical (toslink), coaxial, or RCA red/white audio, so your only choices would be to have a soundbar that has HDMI input that passes video to your TV via HDMI outputs (less likely), or to output audio from your TV to your non-HDMI soundbar and keep it in stereo.

▼ Internet Connectivity: The Roku Streaming Stick supports dual-band wireless; the Roku 1 doesn't. If you don't know what any of this means, then you most likely don't need dual-band wireless right now and can get either device without worrying about it.

▼ YouTube: For some reason, Roku has decided that the Roku 1 won't have YouTube yet. They say they're working on it, but it's pretty obvious that withholding YouTube from their lowest-priced Roku box is a means to lean people toward the higher-priced models.

Meanwhile, as something of a surprise, the Roku Streaming Stick does support YouTube natively, and even supports "casting" from YouTube; A method by which you choose your videos on a portable device or PC, and then "send" it to the Roku. The Roku connects to YouTube directly instead of to your device, and plays your video.

It's a good thing they have this, because the built-in YouTube app interface is clunky, and the search is slow and messy. You almost NEED the casting feature for YouTube to be fully functional.

Another note: If you don't have a birth year listed on your Google+ account (oh, yes: You have one. They kinda forced you to) then you won't be able to view age-restricted YouTube videos on the Roku.

If you need YouTube, then the Roku 1 is out for the time being. Maybe in a few months to a year they'll put YouTube on it, but for now the lowest-cost YouTube-capable Roku is the Streaming Stick. If you don't care about YouTube, then the Roku 1 will be fine.

It should be noted that all other video apps are supported on Roku 1. YouTube is the only one missing, so don't worry about missing out on other Roku channels, including private channels. The Streaming Stick and Roku 1 both support every other channel.

▼ Remote Headphone Jack: Neither the Roku 1 or the Streaming Stick have it. When I had my Roku 3, I never used it, but you may have need of such a thing. if that's the case, you need to aim for the Roku 2 or Roku 3.

▼ Send Video/Photo/Music from Roku App: Both devices fully support this feature.

▼ Search: Both devices fully support Roku's system-wide search feature, which can be very handy for finding contend quickly and easily. This is one of Roku's best features, no matter which unit you own.

▼ Casting: As I said above, the Roku Streaming Stick's YouTube app supports "casting", which is the process of choosing content on a portable device such as a smart phone or tablet, and then instructing the Roku Stick to connect with YouTube directly (NOT with your device) and display the video. This feature is also supported by Netflix, so if you don't like searching on your TV screen for videos on Netflix, you can use your portable device, find the video, and then cast it to your Roku Streaming Stick.

Personally, I have yet to need this for Netflix, as the Roku's Netflix interface is quite nice. Your mileage may vary, though.

And of course, the Roku 1 doesn't do this at all. If you really want the casting feature for Netflix and YouTube, the Streaming Stick is your only choice.

▼ Price: Currently, they're priced the same. No winner here.

▼ Fit: Believe it or not, some people have complained that the Roku Streaming Stick doesn't fit in their TV's HDMI port because of placement, proximity to other ports, or space behind the TV if wall-mounted. The Streaming Stick isn't for everyone because of this, and you may find that the standard Roku 1 device is more versatile in terms of where you can connect it.

I find that a lot of new Roku users are confused by some things, so I'll try to offer some advice here.

▼ You don't turn it off! The Roku devices are designed to remain on at all times. They don't use much power, and when they're on a menu (even within an app, such as the Netflix or Roku app), they don't use any of your Internet bandwidth. Even if you pause a video and leave for a week, you won't use up your bandwidth. PLEASE, if you want the Roku to work properly and easily, don't unplug it or connect it to a surge protector with a switch that you flip when you're done. DON'T TURN IT OFF unless you need to reset the device for some reason! It will NOT be a problem to leave it on. It's designed that way!

▼ As I noted above, if your HDMI port doesn't supply enough power to the Roku Stick, then search the back of your TV for a USB port and use that to power the Stick, using the included USB cable. That should be enough to do the job, and you won't need to connect to a wall outlet or surge protector.

▼ Harmony Users: We're pretty much boned here. We can't use our Harmony remote or hub to control the Roku Streaming Stick, and that means we're stuck using the Roku remote or the Roku App. Take heart, though: You can always have the Roku App and the Harmony App next to each other, and switch between them on your smartphone or tablet. It's not the best solution, but until Logitech decides to connect to the Roku using WiFi, we're out of luck. Only the Harmony keyboard supports RF.

▼ SPECIAL NOTE FOR HOTEL TRAVELERS: If you're picturing grabbing the Roku Streaming Stick and popping it into the hotel TV, then connecting to the hotel WiFi, you may want to reconsider. The Roku Stick does NOT have a web browser, and many hotels (and other free WiFi suppliers) require you to open a web page and accept their Terms & Conditions before being granted access to the Internet. You can't use your portable device or laptop to accept the Terms & Conditions and then stream on the Roku; The Terms & Conditions are usually required to be accepted ON THE DEVICE THAT IS ACCESSING the Internet, i.e. the Roku Streaming Stick.

What this means is that many hotels will simply NOT allow you to connect a Roku Streaming Stick and start watching videos. You may be able to use the "cast" feature to initiate videos from Netflix if you do it from your PC or portable device (I have not tested this yet), but Amazon, Vudu, Hulu, and all other channels except YouTube will be blocked.

My advice, if you are a traveler dreaming of a simple way to watch movies in the hotel without paying the hotel's PPV prices, is to pick up an HDMI cable and bring your laptop. You will have a far easier time connecting your laptop to the TV and using it as a monitor than you will trying to get a Roku Streaming Stick to access hotel WiFi in many places.

▼ I highly recommend getting a screensaver that has weather and time, and setting it to your local area. It's very handy to have the Roku serve as a clock/weather guide when in screen saver mode.

▼ Don't consider the Roku a gaming device by any means. Yes, there are games, but they're not highly-developed and control is frankly pretty awful. If you want a cheap gaming console, consider the Amazon Fire TV, the Ouya, or pick up a used Wii. The Roku is first and foremost a video streaming device, and the games are an afterthought, at best.

▼ Experienced Users, I said it before and I'll say it again: If you want to access local media on your own server, you MUST get PLEX for Roku. With PLEX Channels you can access CBS shows, NBC shows, South Park Studios, The Daily Show, CW shows, SPIKE TV shows, ABC shows, PBS shows, Comedy Central videos, and tons of other content. With the PLEX Media Server on your PC, you can stream your video library in HD with multi-channel surround a LOT better than most XBMC devices handle it, and this includes fan art, movie sheets, and other bells & whistles. PLEX is well worth the small Roku app price, and the PC PLEX Media Server is free.

New cord-cutters and Cable TV refugees: When you step into the world of streaming video and step away from cable and terrestrial TV entirely, you have to get used to some changes in the way you watch things. Here's my quick guide:

▼ Subscribe to Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu Plus. Combined, they're still way cheaper than any cable bill.

▼ Put Crackle on your channel list. Free movies and TV shows. No subscription required.

▼ Use Plex to watch local media.

▼ Search YouTube for "full show" or "full movie" to get some extra content.

▼ Do not expect to see live sports when you're a cord cutter, unless you subscribe to MLBTV or other sports-related subscription services. You can always buy a nice antenna and view anything that the local network affiliates can broadcast.

▼ If you like old movies, there are tons of Roku channels that have FREE movies. Don't pay for a channel until you've exhausted your search of the free ones!

▼ For the kids, you can set up a Netflix Kids account, and there are plenty of kid-friendly and cartoon-loaded Roku channels.

▼ Roku Private Channels are channels that are not "officially" supported by Roku, but can be added by finding a code and entering it at the Roku website in your account settings. They give you other channel options in a wide variety of content.

▼ With that in mind: DO NOT PAY FOR ROKU PRIVATE CHANNEL LISTS!!! You may see them advertised on various sites (this one included!) and they are a SCAM. You can get a list of private channels by doing an Internet search for "Roku Private Channels" -- These lists people are selling are just compilations of the search results you can get for free. Don't be scammed.

▼ If you're going to turn off the TV for the night, make sure to hit the "Home", "Pause" or "Back" button on your Roku remote. Turning off the TV does not stop the show from streaming, and if you're in a channel/app that does automatic advance to the next episode, it will keep playing while the TV is off. This will use up some bandwidth from your ISP, and worse, it will cause you to lose your place in the episode progression! Note that you can pause a show and come back a day later, and you will not have used any additional electricity or bandwidth. Pausing is fine, but it's still better to just exit the show.

▼ You may not there's no "stop" button on the remote. That's because Roku has always considered the "back" button ( ← ) to be the "stop" function. Back will always take you back to the previous menu, which stops the video in the spot you were at. When you go back to it, most channels will let you resume from that position.

Assuming the Roku Streaming Stick is durable and holds up to the additional heat it creates, I'm calling this a 4-star device. You give up a few things going to the Stick from the standard Roku boxes (most notably the IR receiver), but you gain a few features, too, and you have a more compact device that allows you to reclaim some space in your entertainment center.

However, it's not perfect. It lacks that IR receiver, which is a MAJOR loss to owners of universal remotes and audio receivers. It does get hot, which may shorten its life. The smaller size doesn't make the Roku any more useful for travel because it lacks a web browser to accept hotel Terms & Conditions, and you'll still be falling back on your laptop, tablet, or smartphone sometimes. It doesn't support AV (Composite) connections at all (not a loss as far as I'm concerned; If you're still on equipment that requires composite cables, it's time for a new TV before you consider a streaming device).

So I'm whipping out FOUR STARS for the Roku Streaming Stick for HDMI. This would have been a five-star review if the Streaming Stick supported IR remotes, but I understand the small size probably makes that unlikely. Still, it's a loss that cripples the device slightly and makes it fall just short of being the best Roku device so far. Currently, that status remains with the Roku 3, but considering price, the Roku Streaming Stick is a good buy for the money for most people.

For those who do have older equipment, heat concerns, universal remotes, or who just don't need YouTube, the Roku 1 remains an excellent value, too. You really can't go wrong with either one.
Comment Comments (3) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Apr 16, 2014 11:53 AM PDT

Xbox 360 Kinect TV Mount
Xbox 360 Kinect TV Mount
Offered by mnbiz (tax free)
Price: $16.00
47 used & new from $3.89

3.0 out of 5 stars Didn't really fit. Had to fake it., April 7, 2014
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I have a 50" TV, and this thing was not exactly a perfect fit. In fact, I had to improvise and connect in odd places to make it feel secure. The telescoping arms don't go far enough for the VESA standard on larger TVs, it seems.

However, once I messed with it a bit, I was able to get a solid connection and the Kinect was attached with little problem. It still sticks out a bit, but I can live with that. It's better than having the Kinect on the table under the TV where the center speaker is already placed.

My advice? Give it a shot unless you have a TV bigger than 50"... And even then, be aware that it won't fit like it says in the instructions. You'll have to be clever.

iFrogz Near Field Portable Speaker
iFrogz Near Field Portable Speaker
Offered by Deal-Hunters
Price: $22.31
47 used & new from $8.00

4.0 out of 5 stars Surprisingly loud, considering there's no hardwired or wireless connection., April 7, 2014
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I got this for a very low price, and figured I'd just give it a shot. I was pleasantly surprised! It amplifies my cheap cell phone speaker significantly, and the sound is pretty clear. Like it says, you don't need to plug anything in. Just lay it on the surface and find the "sweet spot" for the speaker, no matter how tiny your speaker may be, and you'll have some decent sound.

Now, it's not as good as a full speaker setup, of course, but for travel this is a great little speaker. I can't complain.

HHI iPad 2 / iPad 3 (The New iPad) Polycarbonate Back Shell Rubberized Snap on Hard Cover Case - Black (Compatible with iPad 2 / iPad 3 The New iPad Smart Cover Companion Case)
HHI iPad 2 / iPad 3 (The New iPad) Polycarbonate Back Shell Rubberized Snap on Hard Cover Case - Black (Compatible with iPad 2 / iPad 3 The New iPad Smart Cover Companion Case)
Offered by HandHelditems

4.0 out of 5 stars Fits. Feels good., April 7, 2014
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I like the rubberized feel of shells like this, and when they play nice with the Smart Cover, they make for the perfect around-the-house protection for the iPad. For the price, you won't do any better than this one.

Samsung WB250F/WB200F Smart Digital Camera 14.2 MP 18x Optical Zoom Wi-Fi, Cobalt Black + 8GB SDHC Class 10 Memory + Carrying Case + Mini Tripod Kit + USB SDHC Reader + Memory Wallet
Samsung WB250F/WB200F Smart Digital Camera 14.2 MP 18x Optical Zoom Wi-Fi, Cobalt Black + 8GB SDHC Class 10 Memory + Carrying Case + Mini Tripod Kit + USB SDHC Reader + Memory Wallet
Offered by Big VALUE Inc
Price: $141.79
2 used & new from $140.01

5.0 out of 5 stars A great package and an excellent camera, April 7, 2014
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Short & sweet: The bundle is excellent, and includes everything you need to get started with your camera. The camera is VERY cool, including all the smart wifi features that Samsung has perfected. Want to email your photos? You can do it right from the camera! Want to back up to your PC? Do it wirelessly with the push of a button! Want to upload a video? You can do that, too, right from the camera.

Of course it also has a BRILLIANT zoom and delivers crystal clear photos. For the price, you can't do much better.

Epson VS230 SVGA 3LCD Projector, 2800 color lumens, 2800 white lumens (V11H552220)
Epson VS230 SVGA 3LCD Projector, 2800 color lumens, 2800 white lumens (V11H552220)
Price: $329.99
29 used & new from $329.99

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars As usual, Epson projectors don't disappoint., April 7, 2014
Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
I've had some experience with various models of Epson projectors, and boy do they have a lot of them! I think Epson makes as many models of projector as Samsung makes of televisions or phones! It's sometimes hard to know which projector is best for specific tasks. So far, this VS230 is one of the better ones I've tried.

The color is sufficiently bright and vibrant. 2800 lumens is nothing to sneeze at! Same too, for the white lumens, which means documents look crisp and clear. As an SVGA projector this will handle any HD input you throw at it, and then some.

The onboard speaker-- like in most Epson projectors-- is there as a courtesy, but I don't find it sufficient for multimedia. You wouldn't want to use the internal speaker for a movie or video game, for example. However, it's just fine for the horrible PowerPoint presentations most business executives seem to be so fond of, and it works in a pinch for a TV show or simple game. Still, you'd be better served to run your audio through some external device, as the projector's main goal is not premium sound but premium video.

The image is, of course, quite nice. Those complaining of the "screen door" effect don't understand projectors or were standing WAY too close to the image projection. You are meant to view at a distance, where the individual pixels don't stand out at all. If you get close enough to your TV, you'll see the pixels, too, and standing 2' away from an 100" image is about the same as standing 2" away from a 40" image on your TV.

When you sit back away from the screen (and I do recommend a good screen, or a painted projection surface) you'll see a beautiful image.

Surprisingly, most of Epson's projectors do very well in moderate room lighting. Darkness is best, of course, but you can still see the image well in a daylight room with the blinds closed.

All told, this is another great entry in the Epson projector lineup. If you're looking for something for business, this is a prime choice. If you're looking for something for home entertainment, you'll also be very pleased, though you could get something with a higher lumen rating or better resolution for more money. Most people won't tell the difference between 2800 lumens and 3000 lumens in normal conditions, but those who have really great vision might want to consider the Epson EX series instead.

There's nothing to dislike here. Epson continues to meet the right balance of features and affordability in their VS projector lineup. Once you learn to use it, you won't be disappointed.

SentrySafe SFW205CWB Water Proof Combination Safe, 2X-Large
SentrySafe SFW205CWB Water Proof Combination Safe, 2X-Large
Price: $292.91

5.0 out of 5 stars My UPS guy hates me., April 6, 2014
Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
140 pounds.

That's just about what this sucker weighs in shipping. 140 pounds of large, dense metal and plastic... And cardboard. A super-thick cardboard box surrounds this safe in shipping, and I swear the cardboard might have been harder to get into than some safes!

But that aside, this is a genuine, solid, floor-mountable, waterproof, fire-resistant safe. It's heavy. It's sturdy. It's well-designed. The combination lock worked perfectly and gave me no problems. The door handle feels a little plastic-like, but seems sturdy enough. The trays inside all feel relatively durable.

There's plenty of room for your valuables inside, and the safe comes with re-usable silica packs to protect your documents and other valuables. I have not floor-mounted it with the included bolts yet, but considering how difficult it was for the UPS guy to get it to my place, I don't imagine it will be walking out of here casually any time soon.

I'm not sure exactly why they call this a "digital" safe, as the combination lock is the standard spinning tumblers you've seen on most safes, and not a programmable digital panel or anything like that. There's nothing electronic here; It's all mechanical as far as I can tell.

I really love the thing. I'd say it's worth the investment if you need a place to store your valuables. Just make sure you're on good terms with your UPS driver when you order it.

Jonathan Adler Jacks Cover - Navy Blue (Fits Kindle Paperwhite, Kindle & Kindle Touch)
Jonathan Adler Jacks Cover - Navy Blue (Fits Kindle Paperwhite, Kindle & Kindle Touch)
Price: $28.96

3.0 out of 5 stars Fits, but has some design problems., April 6, 2014
Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
First, let me say that "Navy Blue" is not an accurate description of this cover. I don't see any navy blue on it at all. I see white jacks, orange jacks, green jacks, red jacks, blue jacks, light blue jacks, lime green jacks, purple jacks, and fuchsia jacks on a black background. The interior is a sort of charcoal grey bordering on black. If there's any navy blue on this thing, I must be missing it.

That said, the case fits the Kindle Paperwhite well enough, just as you'd expect. I've no complaints about the fit or build quality. It's a well-made, typical case. Solid outside, protective inside, decent straps. All seems good at first.

My main problem-- the design problem I alluded to in the title-- is that the inside front cover has the words "JONATHAN ADLER" in big, white, bold letters. You know how Amazon says their goal with the Kindle is to have you get lost in the device and the reading experience? Well, this case does a heck of a job pulling you out of the reading experience by placing big white letters in the corner of your vision. You're forced to fold the cover back when reading if you don't want to see the designer's name all the time... And I don't... But just like with a book that damages the spine and the cover becomes less rigid and starts to look cruddy.

Why does Jonathan Adler feel the need to put his name in such big letters in a place where my eyes will be busy trying to read my books? It's distracting. It's ugly. Maybe some people like to have designer names on their stuff, but I find it just makes me upset to have to see some guy's name on MY stuff... And even if I were inclined to put my name on my stuff like this, it wouldn't be on the inside cover in big white letters. it would be outside, on the back, in tastefully small lettering.

If I take this case as any indicator, I suspect Jonathan Adler was the kind of kid whose mom sewed his name inside his underwear and printed name labels for his school supplies. That may be great for him, but it annoys the bejeebers out of me.

So a case that COULD have gotten five stars is getting three. I'm docking one star for the case being labeled "navy blue" and not having a jot of navy blue on it, and another star for the huge white letters in my line of sight on the inside cover.

One more thing: The packaging for this could have been better. It was a messy, heavy, bulky bit of retail packaging for something so small and elegant. I haven't considered this in my review, because it's superficial, but this packaging was most unpleasant and quite a lot of waste. They can do better.

The final verdict: Three stars. An Average product with no deep flaws, but no outstanding features. If you can get it on sale, it's worth it. Use the money you save for a black sticker to cover the obnoxious interior lettering.

ModulR Case, Flip Cover and Accessories for iPad Mini (Black) (C51-50-M)
ModulR Case, Flip Cover and Accessories for iPad Mini (Black) (C51-50-M)
Price: $42.95
2 used & new from $38.10

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Incredible alternative to Otterbox and other heavy cases., April 6, 2014
Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
Now, I'm basing my whole review on an assumption. That assumption is that the protective claims of the ModulR team are true. The reason I'm assuming is because I'm not about to do a series of impact-resistance tests with my iPad.

With that assumption in place, I'll say that the ModulR case is a great choice if you don't want to sacrifice light weight and small size for protection. While a tiny bit bigger than average cases, this is a great deal thinner and lighter than the Otterbox and other impact-resistant cases.

The modular snap-on accessories are very handy. I make use of the wrist strap and hand strap all the time. I get less use out of the shoulder strap, but that's because I just can't imagine walking around with my iPad hanging free at my side no matter how protective the case it. To me that seems like an invitation to steal it.

There are only three negatives to this case:

1. No magnetic sleep/wake function for iPad.

2. The cover can be hard to remove from the front, sometimes.

3. When the front cover is not snapped in place, the screen isn't protected at all, and it's not always convenient to snap on the cover, as it's not designed to open or close easily. This is a huge difference around the house when you're just trying to access the iPad for everyday tasks. Your choice is to leave the screen exposed, or to cover it and then struggle to open it when you need to access the iPad.

This would have benefited by including some form of "around the house" cover that flips open easily, and leaving the snap-on front cover as an option for travel. If it's going to be a modular design, I think they missed the most important option with the iPad, and that's ease-of-access via a flip-open cover. (By the way, it's very confusing that they call their cover a "Flip Cover" when it doesn't actually "flip" so much as it can "be 'flipped' to the back" after some prying).

I may keep using it for travel, but it does feel a little less useful around the house without the ability to quickly open and close the case to get at the screen. You literally have to pry it off the front and then snap it to the back to use the iPad, and that seems slightly awkward at home, where ease of access is more important than impact-resistance.

However, I give this four stars because it truly does seem to be a very protective case, and the modular straps are incredibly useful. Perhaps in time they'll work out a cover for home use.

UPDATE: I received a Storage Stand for the ModulR Case & Flip Cover. It's very clever, though it is primarily a slab of molded plastic. The Flip Cover's little pegs slide into the stand, which holds the iPad in place quite nicely. The storage holes are perfect for a first-party sync cable and AC brick.

However, while I do love the idea of the stand, I have to say I was slightly disappointed that it only allows mounting in landscape format, and not portrait. It has no grooves for a portrait display, which would have been handing for editing documents and doing other page-sized tasks.

Still, it's a neat product and adds to the value of the case. My review rating stands at four stars.

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11-20