Automotive Deals HPCC Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc $5 Albums Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Handmade school supplies Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer showtimemulti showtimemulti showtimemulti  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis Water Sports
Customer Discussions > Stephen Baker forum

A Superior Intellect

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-6 of 6 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Feb 11, 2011 3:35:15 PM PST
Would Natural Selection have fueled an architecture that failed from the start? and continue to fuel it until improvement is found? and yet continue to fuel further into the future until it finally works? ....Unlikely, but unfortunately this is the aptitude behind Artificial Intelligence

Posted on Jan 16, 2012 10:10:56 PM PST
is natural selection applicable to AI?

Posted on Jan 18, 2012 9:52:26 AM PST
This is a very difficult question to answer without an understanding of how is intellect/intelligence truly formed. In the case of biological intelligence, there is no doubt, that natural selection "selected" those entities whom employ a better intellect that its competitors. Those animals that were able to better understand the environment and the limitations of the competition excelled and continued to reproduce, thus succeed. Those animals who did not, simply died. Should AI ever reach the same configuration that biological Intelligence (BI) has, then the answer would be yes. But if AI continues to use today's algorithmic architecture, I am afraid not. However, don't forget that natural selection has one major draw-back and that is that it cultures what works better today, not necessarily what will work better tomorrow.

Posted on Jan 19, 2012 2:18:55 PM PST
J. D. Keet says:
We may not purchase a kindle edition of the Watson book in New Zealand, as we are designated Asia/Pacific. We are the least corrupt nation in the world. Is this intelligent?

Posted on Dec 16, 2014 8:02:16 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 16, 2014 8:23:50 AM PST
Perhaps we give intelligence more credit than it deserves in biological evolution. The shark has proven a survivor on earth, with a model that hasn't changed in tens of millions of years. Lots of animals are smarter. But the shark has the intelligence it needs to operate the killing machine that it is, and to mate. Animals survive by growing sharp teeth, by seeing better, by expanding lung capacity or sloughing off a virus that kills others. I would say that the development of the computer owes much more to intelligent design than evolution.

The evolution of the computer, if we want to call it that, occurs in the marketplace. And if the buyers are backward, or ill-equipped, or blind to its qualities and potential, then it fails. If you take a brand new 24-inch iMac to a medieval peasant, it's useless to him. He can't even plug it in. So, if we're disappointed in the progress AI has made over the last 50 years, it's been limited in part by the imagination of the consumers, including ourselves. That said, AI has made enormous progress even over the last five years. Its impact on our lives is already enormous, and will only grow in the age of data.

Posted on Dec 16, 2014 8:22:56 AM PST
[Deleted by the author on Dec 16, 2014 8:23:08 AM PST]
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in


This discussion

Discussion in:  Stephen Baker forum
Participants:  4
Total posts:  6
Initial post:  Feb 11, 2011
Latest post:  Dec 16, 2014

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers

Search Customer Discussions