Amazon.com: Science, Faith, and Society (Phoenix Books): Michael Polanyi: Books

Product Description

In its concern with science as an essentially human enterprise, Science, Faith and Society makes an original and challenging contribution to the philosophy of science. On its appearance in 1946 the book quickly became the focus of controversy.

Polanyi aims to show that science must be understood as a community of inquirers held together by a common faith; science, he argues, is not the use of "scientific method" but rather consists in a discipline imposed by scientists on themselves in the interests of discovering an objective, impersonal truth. That such truth exists and can be found is part of the scientists' faith. Polanyi maintains that both authoritarianism and scepticism, attacking this faith, are attacking science itself.

About the Author

Michael Polanyi was a Fellow of the Royal Society of England, a professor of physical chemistry and of social studies at the University of Manchester, and a Fellow of Merton College at Oxford. He was the author of many books, of which the University of Chicago Press has published Personal Knowledge, The Logic of Liberty, Meaning, The Study of Man, and Knowing and Being.

Product Details

Paperback: 96 pages
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press (August 15, 1964)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0226672905
ISBN-13: 978-0226672908
Product Dimensions: 7.8 x 5.2 x 0.4 inches
Shipping Weight: 4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #207,784 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Inside This Book (learn more)

First Sentence:
What is the nature of science? Read the first page

Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
second chemist, scientific conscience, scientific proposition, scientific opinion, personal judgement

Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
General Authority, Social Contract, Specific Authority

New!
Concordance | Text Stats

Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Citations (learn more)

This book cites 8 books:

How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (Princeton Science Library) by G. Polya on page 32, and page 34
Science and Human Values by Jacob Bronowski in Front Matter
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn in Front Matter
The Social Contract (Penguin Classics) by Jean-Jacques Rousseau on page 64
Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume, and Rousseau by John Locke on page 64

See all 8 books this book cites

24 books cite this book:

Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture by Christian Smith on 4 pages
What Science Is and How It Works by Gregory N. Derry on page 25, and page 132
What Science Is and How It Works by Gregory N. Derry on page 25, and page 132
Symbolic Worlds: Art, Science, Language, Ritual by Israel Scheffler on page 123
Meaning by Michael Polanyi in Back Matter

See all 24 books citing this book

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	49% buy the item featured on this page: Science, Faith, and Society (Phoenix Books) 4.5 out of 5 stars (2) $14.00
	15% buy Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy 4.4 out of 5 stars (16) $18.00
	14% buy Meaning $19.80
	12% buy The Tacit Dimension 4.3 out of 5 stars (3) $10.88

Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

(What's this?)

Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.

philosophy(1)

Help others find this product — tag it for Amazon search

No one has tagged this product for Amazon search yet. Why not be the first to suggest a search for which it should appear?

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

2 Reviews

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

Average Customer Review

4.5 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Science with a Human Face!, April 28, 2005

By	Kevin Currie-Knight "PhD Student in Education" (Newark, Delaware) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)

"Science Faith and Society" is an attempt by philosopher/chemist Michael Polanyi to dispel the myth of science as an impersonal and detached quest for certain truth. Far from being a radical postmodernist, Polanyi argues that science cannot be passion- or value-free, does not operate by a hard and fast rule-set, and, most importantly, relies on faith as much as reason.

Of course, much of this is old hat by now. Polanyi wrote SFS before Popper left his significant mark on science saying many of the same things, only louder. Kuhn was a direct contemporary of Polanyi and Feyerabend was still to come. Thus, SFS, consisting of three lectures given to the British Asskociation for the Advancement of Science, has an air of immediacy about it that certain similar works in philosophy of science don't have.

The first essay is "Science and Reality," which discusses why (a) science operates on no a priori rule set, but, at best, a collection of loosely held operational guidelines; and (b) why the act of scientific discovery is every bit as creative an act as artistic creation, and thus, must necessarily be value-imbued. (Popper, anyone?)

The second essay, "Authority and Conscience" discusses the type(s) of authority involved in science. From the necessarily hierarchal nature of article publishing to the master/apprentice relationship of science education, Polanyi argues that science is necessarily hierarchal, and that this hierarchy, while not ideal, is not per se a bad thing (contra Popper). He also begins his argument that while science is hierarchal, it is not the type of hierarchy that submits to an authority that barks orders. Rather, science is the type of hierarchy that allows all members to be free in exploration, and to challenge the upper tiers of the hierarchy should they feel them wrong. (Polanyi compares the hierarchy of science to the hierarchy of the protestant church; a hierarchy is noticeable, but members are left free to interpret the bible themselves. This, in contrast to the hierarchy of the catholic church, where the hierarchy involves telling members how the bible is to be interpreted.)

The third essay, "Dedication or Servitude" is a discussion of why science must be free to survive - that is, why if there needs to be a hierarchy, that hierarchy must not be the type that tells sceintists what to think, but should be one that allows for intellectual freedom, including the freedom to challenge science's conclusions. Polanyi's defense of freedom for science is much the same as Hayek's argument against central planning in society.

The overarching theme of this book, though, is that sicence is a human enterprise that was invented by and furthered by humans. As such, it cannot be impersonal, value-neutral, or able to attain certitude. Science presupposes a belief shared in common by all scientists - a faith, that is, in the ideals of science and intellectual inquiry that is a faith like any other, to be sure. While I think Polanyi's equation of science as a faith like any others is a bit over the top (science can be self-justified on pragmatic grounds of its past succcesses compared to other methodologies, I think), this book was a treat to read. Far from denigrating science by putting a human face on it, Polanyi's love for, and faith in, science is evident on every page.

Comment Comments (3) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Guidance in the absence of absolutes, September 24, 2008

By	Pieter "Toypom" (Johannesburg) - See all my reviews (TOP 50 REVIEWER)

This review is from: Science, Faith And Society (Paperback)

In Background & Prospect, the author sets out the aims of this 1946 work which was written in reaction to the persecution of scientists in the Soviet Union. Polanyi felt the need to formulate a philosophy of science that defines the nature of and provides justification for science in light of the Marxist-Leninist denial of the creative power of thought.

Part One: Science & Reality seeks to define the nature of science. He demonstrates that the propositions embodied in natural science are not derived by definite rules from experiential data. It is rather a process of (a) guessing or intuitive speculation driven by the creative impulse, guided by (b) critical caution or verification by observation. Both the aforementioned are channeled through the scientific conscience. The mind of the scientist transcends both the guessing and verification.

In Part Two: Authority & Conscience, Polanyi distinguishes between General Authority and Specific Authority. The first leaves the decision for interpreting traditional rules in the minds of numerous independent individuals; this type of authority requires freedom. Specific Authority centralizes such decisions at one point; this type requires obedience.

Part Three: Dedication & Servitude, considers how freedom is maintained within science itself. Sovereignty in the scientific realm is divided into fragments represented by individual scientists of whom fairness and tolerance are required. Fairness means that the scientist makes an effort to put her/his case objectively, recognizing the limitations of their own abilities and the existence of personal bias; tolerance requires the capacity to endure the unfair/hostile statements of opponents.

Upholding fairness and tolerance involves the public. Controversies between proponents of ideas are conducted in order to canvass support instead of persuading one another. In a public contest, fairness and tolerance can be maintained only when the audience resists false oratory and values moderation. A discerning public able to perceive insincerity of argument is an essential partner in the process of open debate. Such an audience will prefer moderate claims admitting an element of personal conviction in order to maintain mental balance and as proof of conscientious thinking by those appealing for its support.

Institutions that provide shelter to free discussion in a free society may include houses of parliament, courts of law, churches, the media, local government and various private committees in charge of a multitude of cultural, humanitarian and political organizations. A community which practices free discussion agrees with the fourfold proposition that (i) truth exists (ii) all its members value it (iii) they feel compelled to pursue it (iv) they are capable of doing so.

Thus the sovereignty of a free public opinion is the foundation stone of science since a society committed to truth must grant freedom to science as one form of truth. Even though true propositions cannot be established by any explicit criteria we do assert the universal validity of propositions to which we personally assent. In this way we express our conviction that truth is real; according validity to any great domain of the mind is to affirm a faith that can only be upheld within a community.

Our current civilizational crisis derives from the idea that freedom does not mean the acceptance of any particular obligations and is incompatible with a prescription of its own limits. In this view, freedom of thought means the rejection of any type of traditional beliefs including those on which freedom itself is based. Polanyi provides a brief outline of the historical process by which the (post)modern crisis has arisen.

In discussing movements like Bolshevism and Fascism he observes that they owed their success entirely to hidden spiritual resources, gaining power on a wave of patriotic or humanitarian passions. As shown by Hoffer in The True Believer, those who discard the pursuit of truth for the interests of particular groups inevitably attach their aspirations to the struggle for power. All their love & devotion are poured into a residue of reality, the power of the chosen party. This is the root of the fanaticism and the profound moral response even while moral realities are scorned; love of truth & justice is distorted into a love of state power.

The society that spurns transcendent ideals chooses to be subjected to servitude, as so thoroughly explained by Hayek in The Road to Serfdom. Intolerance returns with a vengeance; the skeptical empiricism which had once broken the shackles of medieval church authority proceeds to destroy the authority of conscience. See also Stephen Hicks' remarkable book Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism And Socialism From Rousseau To Foucault.

There is no common ground for argument between the believer in transcendent reality and the sinisterist but conversion is possible, where the collectivist's beliefs are transferred from the theory of political violence to the spiritual realm. The case of the Romantic nihilist is more difficult according to Polanyi, since the cult of brutality tends to utterly corrupt the very core of humanity.

Polanyi's distinction is crucial: although he denies that truth is demonstrable, he asserts that it is indeed knowable by tradition and by conscience which is mankind's guide to truth. It is impossible - as logical positivism demonstrates - of verifying any universal statements (a fact that exacerbates the crisis caused by skeptical empiricism), but tradition remains the foundation for universal ideals. We ought thus to cultivate to the best of our ability the particular strain of tradition into which we were born.

Polanyi concludes that well-being seems not to be the real purpose of society but secondary to its task of fulfilling aims in the spiritual field. The knowledge of abiding concerns is reinforced by the free conscience of every generation, adding to our spiritual heritage. We may therefore assume that the source of this inspiration is the same as that which first gave mankind its society-forming knowledge. Knowledge of reality & acceptance of those obligations that guide our consciences will ultimately reveal to us The Eternal Divine in man and society. This thought-provoking book concludes with three indices: Premises of Science, Significance of New Observations and Correspondence with Observation.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 2 customer reviews...

.jsOffDisplayBlock { display: block; } .jsOffDisplayInline { display: inline; } .jsOffVisibility { visibility: visible; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayNoneBlock { display: block; } .jsOnDisplayNoneInline { display: inline; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; }

Customer Discussions

Beta (What's this?)

New! See all customer communities, and bookmark your communities to keep track of them.

This product's forum (0 discussions)

	Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
	No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight

Start a new discussion

Topic:

First post:

Receive e-mail when new posts are made

Prompts for sign-in

[Cancel]

Guidelines

Active discussions in related forums

Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
philosophy Without religion, there can there be morals?	387	1 minute ago
science ID asymmetry?	10	41 minutes ago
philosophy Spinoza's Doctrine of Essence	13	1 hour ago
science David Ussery speaks	191	1 hour ago
science Help explaining certain events using natural selection	0	1 hour ago
textbook Textbooks for Kindle DX?	40	10 hours ago
textbook Does anyone use Discovering Geometry: An Investigative Approach?	5	14 hours ago

The Philosophy community

Latest activity 2 hours ago

8,591 customers have contributed 14,963 products, 307 discussions and more...

› Explore the community

The Philosophy Of Science community

Latest activity 4 days ago

428 customers have contributed 441 products, 47 lists & guides and more...

› Explore the community

The Science community

Latest activity 3 hours ago

8,884 customers have contributed 8,484 products, 1,023 discussions and more...

› Explore the community

Explore more

› See all Customer Communities

› Your communities

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Be the first person to add an article about this item at Amapedia.com.

› See featured Amapedia.com articles

Listmania!

e4 mcgrath 2005: A list by Pavithran Thomas
Retrieving the Tradition: A list by Freder1ck
Intellectual Parallels and Paradoxes: A list by Didaskalex "Eusebius Alexandrinus"

Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...

study evolution and you're a Christian Biblical conservative: A guide by R. M. Williams "just an avid reader"
read the best of evangelical Biblical Hermeneutics: A guide by Jeremy Kidwell "kidwellj"
Ask the Questions that Matter: A guide by Didaskalex "Eusebius Alexandrinus"

Create a guide

Look for Similar Items by Category

Books > New & Used Textbooks > Humanities > Philosophy > Epistemology
Books > New & Used Textbooks > Science & Mathematics
Books > Nonfiction > Philosophy > Consciousness & Thought
Books > Nonfiction > Philosophy > Epistemology
Books > Science > History & Philosophy

Hot Deals on Hitachi

Routers don't get much more powerful than the "Incredible Hulk." Check out the entire line of Hitachi routers sold by Amazon.com.

›Shop all Hitachi

Best Books of 2008

Find our top 100 editors' picks as well as customers' favorites in dozens of categories in our Best Books of 2008 Store.

S-T-R-E-T-C-H

Customers rave about the Neckpro Home Traction Device. The Neckpro uses a unique ratcheting mechanism instead of a water bag to relieve neck pain caused by whiplash, osteoarthritis, neck strain, fibromyalgia, and everyday stress.

›Buy now