Review
CHOICE Calls Pulitzer's Gold Essential
One-time Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee called it Big Casino, the cream of the cream.New Orleans Times-Picayune editor Jim Amoss called it simply: the Pulitzer. Both these top journalists were referring to the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, the most prestigious of the Pulitzers and the subject of his book. [In Pulitzer's Gold] Harris looks at the background, intrique, turns and twists, rivalry, and unapologetic joys surround the gold medal. Few people, even those on the staffs of awarding winning newspapers, know much about the publications honored with the public service prize, and Harris's intent is to offer evidence--through research and critical assessment--that newspapers are indeed public servants. He succeeds very well. The treatment is not chronological. Harris begins with coverage of Hurricane Katrina and moves through sexual abuse by Priests, wrongdoing by the Los Angeles city government, exposure of secret land deals in eastern Long Island, investigation of Synanon, and neglect and abuse of children with mental retardation. With this volume, Harris adds significantly to the legacy of Joseph Pulitzer. A companion to John Hohenberg's The Pulitzer Diaries: Inside America's Greatest Prize, the book includes abundant photographs, comprehensive lists of all the Pulitzer Prizes, and an excellent bibliography. Summing up: Essential. All readers, all levels --CHOICE, July 2008--Reviewed by S. W. Whyte, Montgomery County Community College
Excellent Book Shows Newspapers Do Matter
Anyone wanting to understand the proud tradition of high-quality newspaper journalism will find Roy J. Harris Jr.'s Pulitzer's Gold a satisfying and instructive read, with an implicit warning about the future of journalism
Harris is a former Wall Street Journal reporter whose father, Roy J.
Harris, was a Post-Dispatch reporter. His reporting, with that of George Thiem of the Chicago Daily News, won the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 1950 for exposing 37 Illinois newsmen on that state's payroll.
Until The New York Times won its fifth for coverage of the victims of Sept.
11, the Post-Dispatch had won the most Public Service awards, considered the most prestigious of the Pulitzer Prizes. These awards are for meritorious journalism that benefits the public good.
Thus, the New York Times won in 1972 for its coverage of the Pentagon Papers, which also triggered a landmark Supreme Court case guaranteeing the right to publish in virtually every case regarding national security. The Washington Post won in 1973 for its reporting on Watergate and President Richard M. Nixon's administration's attempted cover-up. The Boston Globe won in 2003 for its exposure of Roman Catholic priests who molested children and the way church authorities covered up the crimes.
Jump onto the Internet today and you can read of the supposed irrelevance of newspapers. They are eclipsed by instant news, which is often titillating tidbits that are swept away in a few hours by more of the same.
As an implicit counterargument, Harris' carefully researched book tells the story behind each Public Service Award, from the New York Times in 1918 for publishing official documents of European statesmen relating to World War I, through the Wall Street Journal last year on corporate backdating of stock options for business executives.
What is so obvious in Harris' telling of these stories is the invaluable contribution committed newspaper publishers and dedicated reporters and editors have made to the quality of civic and public behavior. Where would we be as a country had the Washington Post not uncovered the many crimes around Watergate? What would we not understand had the Sun-Herald of Biloxi, Miss., and the Times-Picayune of New Orleans not written so bravely and thoroughly of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina?
The great question, not only for journalists, but for the citizens of the United States, is whether newspapers will continue to aspire to superior reporting and coverage in the face of the Internet, the incessant drumbeat of criticism and ridicule from the right and the seeming indifference of an increasingly larger share of the public to the important issues of the day.
Harris' book lays out the case for excellence in public service by all journalists, who Joseph Pulitzer believed were integral to a well-functioning democracy. The contrast with the short-sighted, self-absorbed blather that trashes newspapers, which are uniquely suited to pursuing long-term, in-depth investigative reporting, is quite stark. In short, democracy needs reporters and editors who can take a long, hard look at our common issues, unaffected by ratings, rumors, bling and profits.
That's the challenge for publishers and senior editors that Harris raises in his excellent book --St. Louis Post-Dispatch, March 9, 2008--Reviewed by Repps Hudson
Stories that Set Gold Standard for Journalism
Shrinking circulations. Declining advertising dollars. Staff cutbacks.
Reduced newsgathering resources. Uncertain tomorrows.
American newspapers today face odds a Vegas bookie or a social Darwinist might find daunting. With worrisome frequency, the news business itself is the subject of woe-be-us reporting.
Dire dispatches notwithstanding, the longer view of ink-on-paper journalism stresses civic surveillance and commitment, providing a hopeful counterpoint. Exigencies of the moment should never obscure the historic significance of a free press to the workings of democracy.
Pulitzer's Gold by Roy J. Harris Jr. is both antidote and anthem. This well-researched and engrossingly presented study chronicles time-bound cases of award-winning journalism with timeless lessons for news people and citizens who care about reportage with reverberation.
Harris, a veteran editor and reporter, relates stories behind the stories that won the Gold Medal for public service in the annual Pulitzer Prize competition. By interviewing journalists participating in Gold Medal performances, Harris takes a reader inside the newsroom. He provides detailed accounts of the Washington Post for its revelations about Watergate, the Boston Globe for its reporting on the scandal involving Catholic clergy, and the New York Times for its comprehensive handling of post-September 11 America. Recent cases tend to receive more extensive treatment, but the author also mines the Pulitzer archives and historical accounts for background illuminating earlier winners.
Since the Gold Medal is an institutional rather than an individual prize, the award always involves collaboration among staff members - reporters, editors, photographers - and the author deftly probes the process...
Pulitzer's Gold is first-rate journalism history. Especially when the future of the news business seems murky and the legion of media critics keeps growing, Harris' book celebrates the gold standard of press coverage
- work of consequence worth striving to emulate as a service to the public and to American democracy. --Philadelphia Inquirer, March 23, 2008--Reviewed by Robert Schmuhl
Product Description
Pulitzer s Gold is the first book to trace the ninety-year history of the coveted Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, awarded annually to a newspaper rather than to individuals. Harris recalls dozens of stories behind the stories, often allowing the journalists involved to share their own accounts. Readers will recognize some of the stories, like the New York Times Pentagon Papers exclusive and the Watergate scandal that Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein dug out for the Washington Post. But Harris takes his Gold Medal saga through two World Wars, the Great Depression, the Civil Rights struggle, and the Vietnam era before bringing public-service journalism into today s age of environmental and corporate exposes. Story after story illustrates how for small town papers or metropolitan dailies alike, public-service reporting is a point of pride for the American press.
See all Editorial Reviews