Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
29 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting, well researched book, November 10, 1999
Sheldon Richman presents us with a fascinating story here. Why were public schools first founded? Because people were illiterate? No. Records from colonial times show that literacy rates were higher than they are now in some places. There were all kinds of instructors, schools, schoolmasters, tutors, and self-taught leaders like Benjamin Franklin, and Alexander Hamilton, at the time of the American Revolution. There was tremendous resistance, well into the 20th century against government-owned, operated, and controlled "free schools." And no wonder. We now have an established school system that manifests all the problems the Founders saw inherent in an established church. The arguments the promoters gave are presented here, and some of then are pretty scary. The goals of the public school founders had more to do with the state's interests, than children's or family's interests. The idea was to indoctrinate children with the morality preferred by "politically correct" officials of the time. Compulsory laws came in when labor unions wanted to keep kids from competing for jobs. The opponents give their side here, too. Like a lot of people, I did not know much about the history of public schools before I started reading books like this one. I have come to agree with this author. This is an excellent argument for freedom of education, and giving control back to families and parents.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Passionate Polemic, September 20, 2000
This review is from: Separating School & State: How to Liberate America's Families (Paperback)
Most of the last three generations of Americans grew up attending public schools, therefore it is unsurprising that so few people question the premise behind it. After all, as Sheldon Richman poinst out in this highly charged book, why is it that we trust the free market to provide us with important things like food and clothing, while we think nothing of permitting education to be a government run enterprise? After reading Separating School & State, it will be hard to look at public education in America the same way ever again.Richman discusses the origins of public schooling in America, how educators like Horace Mann were influenced by the public schools in Prussia, apparently unaware that the schools there served the function of molding children to be dutiful servants of the state. My only fault with Separating School & State is that I would like to have seen more discussion about possible free market educational models, but that is probably a book to be written some other day. Richman's book should be read in tandem with Myron Lieberman's Public Education: An Autopsy. Whereas Richman arouses the passions of those like myself with his take no prisoners approach and his libertarian perspective, Lieberman's prose is much drier as he explains that the public school model is inherently faulty because it is a model that is more concerned with protecting the education providers than in serving the real needs of the education consumers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
practically plagiarized, March 9, 2006
This review is from: Separating School & State: How to Liberate America's Families (Paperback)
First of all, let me say that I'm a staunch Libertarian. I agree with all of Mr. Richman's ideas, I think American education is in drastic need of reform, and I do not believe in government schooling at all. Having said that, this is a horrible book. Most of it has nothing to do with education per se, but is rather a rehash of all of the classic, broad Libertarian arguments. He talks at great length about how privatizing education will give parents greater choice and control over their children's education, the superiority of the market over government control, yada yada. Yes, these arguments apply to education, but they are not specifically about education. Neither is this interesting writing. Anybody familiar with very basic Libertarian ideas will be bored to tears by this book.
Furthermore, Richman's main sources are "Education: Free and Compulsory," by Rothbard, and various works by Gatto. Half of the book is comprised of quotes from these and a few other sources. The other half is Richman's rephrasing of these quotes. I cannot emphasize enough how little Richman adds to the ideas he presents. The reviews below discuss how Richman talks about the history of education, the comparison of church and school, etc. If these reviewers had read "Free and Compulsory," they would have gotten the same discussion at a much deeper level from a much better author. One reviewer mentioned how the format of school, with children in desks being lectured, is a problem. If they'd read "Dumbing us Down," they'd have gotten a better discussion of that from someone with experience. Now, the two aforementioned books are certainly good works, and if you're interested in education, I'd recommend reading them, but you don't need to read Richman's glorified synopsis.
Finally, it's not surprising that Richman doesn't have any original thoughts on education. He's not an educator, he's a writer for a Libertarian think-tank. As such, I should not find it surprising that this book is a rehashing of familiar Libertarian ideas. If you're really interested in the problems of this country's education system, read Gatto, he was a public school teacher for thirty years, and he has very good, credible insights.
PS. The only reason I'm giving this book a second star is for its 20 page appendix that discusses some studies on standardized testing and the relationship between school performance and work performance. It's a good discussion. If the whole book were like it, I might not be so mad I spent fifteen dollars. As it is though, I must recommend emphatically, DON'T BUY THIS.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|