TofuFlyout DIY in July Shop Men's Classics Shop Men's Classics Shop Men's Learn more nav_sap_disc_15_fly_beacon $5 Albums See All Deals Storm Free Fire TV Stick with Purchase of Ooma Telo Luxury Beauty Home Improvement Shop all gdwf gdwf gdwf  Amazon Echo  Amazon Echo All-New Kindle Paperwhite GNO Shop Now Deal of the Day
Buy Used
$0.01
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by -bearbooks-
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Very good copy, minimal signs of use. We ship all orders daily, M-F, and have a superior Customer Service team. Buy with confidence.

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

Wish List unavailable.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? Hardcover – Deckle Edge, April 6, 2010

72 customer reviews

See all 12 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover, Deckle Edge
"Please retry"
$6.66 $0.01

Best Books of the Year So Far
Best Books of the Year So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2015's Best Books of the Year So Far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster; 1 edition (April 6, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1416541624
  • ISBN-13: 978-1416541622
  • Product Dimensions: 6.2 x 1 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (72 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #558,118 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Amazon Customer on March 2, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
This is a wonderful book written with gusto and humor by the academic, James Shapiro. After being subjected to facile commentary aired by PBS, who has that program and so many more of which to be ashamed, Shapiro's work reminded me of all that is right in the world...even in academia. It must be an honor and inspiration to hear Shapiro lecture. For a straightforward yet somehow thrilling recap of the reality of William Shakespeare and his contemporaries, read this book.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Mark Mason on April 14, 2015
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
The best argument ever made for Shakespeare's authorship of his work, not only thorough but mesmerizing: Shapiro's scholarship not only authoritative but a compelling read. Shapiro brilliantly illuminates the personalities of both Shakespeare's contemporaries and the conspiracy theorists who insisted that the Bard wasn't the true author of his work, and then destroys those arguments in a chapter unique in all the literature on the subject. One of my all-time favorite books.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 17 people found the following review helpful By LostBoy76 on January 9, 2012
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
"The conspiracy community regularly seizes on one slip of the tongue, misunderstanding or slight discrepancy to defeat 20 pieces of solid evidence; accepts one witness of theirs, even if he or she is a provable nut, as being far more credible than 10 normal witnesses on the other side; treats rumours, even questions, as the equivalent of proof; leaps from the most minuscule of discoveries to the grandest of conclusions; and insists, as the late lawyer Louis Nizer once observed, that the failure to explain everything perfectly negates all that is explained."
- Vincent Bugliosi, from Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

"The problem is that nonsense can and does go by default. It wins the argument by sheer persistence, by inexhaustible re-iteration, by staying at the meeting when everyone else has gone home, by monomania, by boring people into submission and indifference."
- Theodore Dalrymple

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
- Christopher Hitchens

In this Age of Information (but not of Knowledge), the tenacious belief in grand conspiracy theories for which there is not a shred of proof is a continuing testament to human folly, paranoia, and gullibility. The fervent belief by some that 9/11 was an inside job, or that JFK was assassinated by the C.I.A., or that the moon landing was a hoax filmed on a Hollywood backlot, or that a sinister and all-powerful Illuminati are directing the policy of national governments around the globe, and others, all testify to the need of some people to see malignant forces lurking somewhere in the background, hoodwinking the masses.
Read more ›
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful By Kirk McElhearn VINE VOICE on August 13, 2013
Format: Paperback
I'd always ignored the so-called Shakespeare authorship question, because I think it's irrelevant. I don't care who wrote Shakespeare's plays, because it's the plays that count, not the man. But I decided to read James Shapiro's Contested Will out of curiosity about how the theory that Shakespeare didn't write Shakespeare took hold.

It so happens that I'm familiar with a lot of the backstory - the rise of biblical criticism and the questioning of who Homer was - that serve as a foundation to the earliest anti-Stratfordian theories. It's easy to understand how, in the early 19th century, people who felt this approach so important could be convinced that another great author was not who he seemed. But as time went by, this became a story of lies, deceit and forgery, as well as convoluted conspiracy theories.

Deep down, it seems that there are two essential elements that come into play. The first is that, according to skeptics, there is no way the son of a glover could have written so eloquently about so many things. His limited education could not have enabled him to write such profound plays. As if in the nature vs. nurture argument, only nurture counts. This has been proven wrong with many artists, musicians and authors who came from humble beginnings, so it seems like a moot point, and surprises me that so many people bring up this point to deny Shakespeare's legitimacy.

The second element is the belief, which became prevalent in the romantic period, that all art is personal; that art reflects personal experiences. If this is the case, the skeptics say, then Shakespeare, who never visited Italy, could not have written about Italy. This argument seems childish to me; could a writer who has never visited Mars write about that planet?
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
54 of 97 people found the following review helpful By Roger A. Stritmatter on April 5, 2013
Format: Paperback
Surveying some of the top-rated reviews of this book the need for a more informed perspective is painfully apparent. James Shapiro's book is not what the five star reviews crack it up to be.

Shapiro is a skilled and persuasive writer, but he is neither a reliable intellectual historian nor a serious scholar of Shakespeare and his age. To my knowledge, the following critical points have not been mentioned by previous reviewers, but they do deserve attention for what they tell us about Shapiro's methodological sloppiness, disregard for factual accuracy, and willingness to participate in what candor can only characterize as a disinformation campaign.

If you don't believe me, read on.....

1) Shapiro erroneously states that the first instance of the hyphenated name "Shake-speare" is on the 1593 quarto of *Venus and Adonis*. It is in the pseudonymous 1594 publication, *Willowbie His Avisa*.

2)He invents (or rather, borrows without attribution) a bogus typographical explanation for the hyphen.

3)That Shapiro's pattern of misrepresentation and avoidance on the matter of the hyphenation of the name is a calculated confidence game is further indicated by the fact that he manages to write a 339 page book on the Shakespearean question without admitting that the title of the 1609 quarto text of the Sonnets is *Shake-speares Sonnets*, i.e. conspicuously spelled with a hyphen.

4)If Shapiro's only errors and misrepresentations concerned the hyphen in the bard's name we might be inclined to dismiss these points as much ado about punctuation. Sadly, there are many further instances of Shapiro's contempt for real scholarship, viz.
Read more ›
175 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?