40 used & new from $0.59

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Embracing Reality
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

Embracing Reality (Paperback)

~ (Author) "Kenneth Earl Wilber II came into this world on January 31, 1949, in Oklahoma City while his traveling parents were moving to another United States..." (more)
Key Phrases: Great Nest, Shambhala Publications, Great Mother (more...)
4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


16 new from $2.90 24 used from $0.59

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
  Paperback, November 17, 2004 -- $2.90 $0.59

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy

Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy

by Ken Wilber
4.0 out of 5 stars (27)  $13.57
Being Evolution and Immortality: An Outline of Integral Philosophy (A Quest Book)

Being Evolution and Immortality: An Outline of Integral Philosophy (A Quest Book)

by Haridas Chaudhuri
Eye to Eye: The Quest for the New Paradigm

Eye to Eye: The Quest for the New Paradigm

by Ken Wilber
4.2 out of 5 stars (5)  $17.13
Integral Life Practice: A 21st-Century Blueprint for Physical Health, Emotional Balance, Mental Clarity, and Spiritual Awakening

Integral Life Practice: A 21st-Century Blueprint for Physical Health, Emotional Balance, Mental Clarity, and Spiritual Awakening

by Ken Wilber
4.7 out of 5 stars (12)  $13.57
Where's Wilber At?: Ken Wilber's Integral Vision in the New Millennium

Where's Wilber At?: Ken Wilber's Integral Vision in the New Millennium

by Brad Reynolds
4.3 out of 5 stars (3)  $15.56
Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

The first complete guide to the full range of work by Ken Wilber, arguably today's most popular living philosopher.

The first such book written with Wilber's support and guidance, Embracing Reality is the most thorough Ken Wilber research tool available. It features:

* an in-depth intellectual biography of Wilber
* a chapter-by-chapter analysis of his major works
* forty-eight line drawings depicting some of Wilber's key concepts
* twenty black-and-white photographs of Wilber's original book jackets
* twenty-one detailed charts correlating Wilber's concepts and those of other philosophers
* passages from some of Wilber's core works
* definitions of essential terms
* a complete Wilber bibliography

Embracing Reality is a student's and researcher's companion in navigating the works of Ken Wilber, who has published more than twenty books in less than twenty-five years. Many of Wilber's new readers are looking for a reliable primer. Many longtime readers are looking for a magnum summary. Embracing Reality provides both.


About the Author

Brad Reynolds has studied under Ken Wilber for the past ten years.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 480 pages
  • Publisher: Tarcher (November 18, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1585423173
  • ISBN-13: 978-1585423170
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 7.5 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #744,796 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

More About the Author

Brad Reynolds
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Visit Amazon's Brad Reynolds Page

Inside This Book (learn more)





Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

 

Customer Reviews

4 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.5 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
25 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars super book, November 27, 2004
By Daryl Paulson (Bozeman, Montana) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Brad Reynolds has written an exceedingly important book. This book describes Ken Wilber's philosophy and his books to date in very clear terms. He has done Wilber an incredible favor in not straying from Wilber's path and carefully summarizing each of his books. Reynolds is a very clear writer who may have something to say beyond an interpreter for Wilber. It would be nice in the future to hear Reynolds view of the world.

The only negative of the book is the cheap paper it is printed on--newspaper grade. This book should have been printed in hardcover or at least a durable paper.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Wilber for idiots and scholars, May 11, 2006
First of all, the writing in Embracing Reality is fantastic in that it is clear, concise, and it flows beautifully. I would say that it is even better than Wilber's writing, especially Wilber's "novel", Boomeritis.

If you are like me and find Wilber's ideas both fascinating and extremely dense, Reynolds' book cuts through Wilber's complex ideas and presents them clearly so that anyone can understand them. I can't tell you how helpful it is for a scholar like Reynolds' to highlight the main points of a chapter or book itself so that it starts really making sense. In this way, Reynolds' book is an indispensible guide and needed companion to all of Wilber's works. Read Wilber, then read Reynolds to understand what you just read from Wilber.

But for the Wilber scholar this book is also great. It brings together in one place, all of Wilber's current work (I know Wilber has moved and evolved since this was published, but Reynolds is coming out with a new book called, Where's Wilber At?, that keeps pace with Wilber's evolution). Reynolds is able at various points (his Introduction is brilliant in its summary and is worth the price of the book alone)to summarize and epitomize Wilber's work in the clearest lanuage possible. He's also pulled in various graphs, charts, and pictures from all sorts of sources (you would have to buy all of Wilber's books to get this stuff), which further clarify the concepts.

I can't say enough about how careful and meticulous the research is embedded in this book, but I know Reynolds' work has saved me tons of time and money in my own Wilber research. If you are a Wilber fan, then you will want to have this book, as well as Reynolds' next book.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars A critical review of Embracing Reality, including a personal perspective on Wilber and some his ideas., July 4, 2009
By Seth T. Miller (Portland, OR) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Embracing Reality offers two things, something of a semi-biographical contextualization of the development of Wilber's thoughts and writings, and a series of more-or-less detailed summaries of those same works. For anyone who is not familiar with the different phases of Wilber's thought, this is a nice reference work, and was most edifying for its picture of the development of Wilber's thinking. I appreciated the detailed descriptions of some of his personal influences and struggles, but I couldn't quite get over a kind of sticky feeling about the author's undisguised near-worship of the man. It felt like the whole book was kind of an apology for Wilber's work. There's nothing wrong with this, of course, (particularly if the author presents it in this way, which isn't the case here) but it doesn't give me the feeling that I'm getting a balanced perspective on his work, as there is little to no criticism of him or his ideas in the whole book.

To help remedy this, if anyone is interested, here is a lengthy and equally unbalanced criticism of Wilber's work by a very outspoken critic of his work, available as a free PDF download at [...]. These two offerings certainly don't add up to a balanced perspective, but at least it fleshes out the field a little, and gives an idea of the kind of interactions that Wilber seems to spark, for any who wish to get involved in such a thing. Honestly for me, having skimmed and read about 2/3 of the Norman Einstein book, I'm both grateful for an alternate perspective and frustrated by the seeming lack of ability for coherent critical dialogue to take place between Ken Wilber and his critics.

On the one hand, and this characterizes what seems to be a pattern in general, I find acrimonious and personal criticisms between Ken and critics that is full of what strikes me very clearly as quite non-enlightened and non-integral type of communication from both sides. On the other hand it seems there are some criticisms that are simply ignored for whatever reason.

In any case, when I really try to get a sense for the gestalt of both Wilber and the communities that he inspires (both as `followers', critics, and others), I am met with quite a variety of perceptions and feelings that it is hard to integrate into a coherent vision.
A few things stand out, however (all of these I completely accept as my personal experiences, which obviously reveal as much or more about me as they do of Wilber):

1) Wilber is unabashedly intellectual. Not a bad thing, by any means, in and of itself, but I actually mean this in part as a criticism. Something happens when one's intellectual ideas move beyond themselves, and flow out naturally into the rest of the natural aspects of a human life: the feelings and the will. Try as I might, I have yet to find much evidence that satisfies my purely personal sense that this is the case for Wilber; I experience him much more as an enlarged head sitting atop a less developed torso and even less developed limbs, with some kind of blockage at his neck which both grants him great capacity for intellectual speech while stifling its ability to be infused with a balanced and integrative flow of feelings and a truly holistic basis in action. His actual physical visage reinforces this sensation, with his bald head, thick neck, prominent brows and thin lips, along with a physically well-developed lower body. Rudolf Steiner, whom I hold in the highest regard, mentions something very apropos to this point about the dynamic interrelationship between different aspects of the human being undergoing esoteric development, (from his book How to Know Higher Worlds, available free at [...]):

"In all spiritual science there is a fundamental principle which cannot be transgressed without sacrificing success, and it should be impressed on the student in every form of esoteric training. It runs as follows: All knowledge pursued merely for the enrichment of personal learning and the accumulation of personal treasure leads you away from the path; but all knowledge pursued for growth to ripeness within the process of human ennoblement and cosmic development brings you a step forward. This law must be strictly observed, and no student is genuine until he has adopted it as a guide for his whole life. This truth can be expressed in the following short sentence: Every idea which does not become your ideal slays a force in your soul; every idea which becomes your ideal creates within you life-forces."

I get the sense from Embracing Reality, which describes Wilber's voracious appetite for intellectual works, as potentially problematic in leading to an overdevelopment of intellectual forces at the expense of a more coherent and balanced progression of all aspects of the human being. Of course, all this is meant in full awareness that the content of Wilber's intellectual works (to some extent ironically, I feel) describe a somewhat similar perspective to the one Steiner mentions above.

2) Wilber seems to have a very large number of `followers', many of whom emulate Wilber's style and mannerisms, physically as well as in speech and patterns of thought. Emulation, as I understand it, does not fit very well into a path of esoteric development except in a very strict devotional type situation (which is increasingly rare, requiring the relinquishment of one's ego in totality to a teacher, and which -- I would argue -- does not at all describe the vast majority of not all of Wilber's followers, who tend to (with much variation) have very strong personal egos).

3) Perhaps because of this element of ego-enhancement (again, recognizing this as a personal judgment, on the basis of my interactions with a variety of people who to a greater or lesser extent embodied this characteristic, as well as through the admittedly not terribly comprehensive research regarding Wilber that I have done in my master's program at JFKU and PhD program at CIIS (in both places there is no shortage of Wilber fans)), Wilber makes himself available to, and even incites quite strongly, polarization and criticism from a number of fronts, with equally staunch `defenders'. In the midst of the ensuing debates, because of the tendency for an increased need for interdifferentiation and the drawing of intellectual lines in the sand on behalf of both 'sides' (which will just get blown away by the first strong wind anyway), the pattern seems to be one that easily slides into confrontation, even actually inviting such. My sense is that some not insignificant portion of Ken's ideas stem from the ongoing development of these types of confrontations, i.e. I get the feeling that definite portion of his thinking arises out of the smoldering ashes of a combative, polarizing milieu. I am, obviously, suggesting that the way in which a thought content comes to be represented in a human soul is not capable of being separated from the content itself. The process of the thinking that produced the thought has consequences for the thought itself. One could even, perhaps, speak of karma here, in the sense of actions which have lasting effects both in the world and for oneself.
4) I deeply admire Wilber's principle that every system and perspective is "true but partial". But this, in the context of the above criticisms, seems to lead him into a difficult situation (because true integration is generally born through suffering, it seems) where, lacking (I am open to discovering otherwise as I continue engaging with his work) a very... hygienic interdevelopment of the whole personality along with its capacities, he seems forced to rely upon the basis from which is strengths have flowed. For Wilber, this again lies squarely in the intellectual domain. It seems that the major path forward is one of continuous distinction and differentiation between and among concepts from the widest possible sources -- but it keeps the flavor of distinction that remains powerful primarily in the conceptual realm due to the (relative) absence of a comprehensive integration of the feeling and the willing aspects with the intellectual.

These are difficult things to speak of, and who am I to make such sweeping judgments? I can only say that I am open to discovering otherwise, and that I feel that I am able to make this kind of criticism in part because Wilber is explicitly speaking about precisely the types of issues I am raising here (in Wilber-speak this would refer to lines, levels, states, stages, transcend/include, quadrants, etc.). As a willingly public figure who addresses the breadth and depth of material that Wilber does, and on the basis of the strength of various claims he makes (particularly in the realm of esoteric development), he expressly places himself in a position of inviting discussion of the extent to which he has directly and actually embodied the very principles he is espousing.

Reynolds takes some pains to provide what I consider to be a weak response to this criticism, which he brings up as variations on a single theme, (paraphrased): `Ken has meditated for x number of years and thus isn't merely thinking about these things; he has experienced them directly', i.e. his oft-cited satori event, his living in the continuous awareness of the non-dual, etc. I do not doubt the sincerity of his practice, or even (okay, I actually do have some doubts here, I'll admit) his personal claims concerning his enlightenment experiences. However, this simply has no necessary bearing on the content of Wilber's ideas. The question is whether or not, when the ideas were formed, and when they were written down, was the activity present in Wilber's being one that was permeated through and through with the quality of the enlightenment experiences which are supposed to form the `practical' foundations for his intellectual... Read more ›
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Wilber Cliff's NOTES!!
Brad has done us all a great service: he has read and digested the entire corpus of Ken Wilber's magnificent work and distilled it down to bite-size chunks of the sweetest and... Read more
Published on February 25, 2006 by F. Marrero

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   




Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.