History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology I and over 360,000 other books are available for Amazon Kindle – Amazon’s new wireless reading device. Learn more

 

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
Express Checkout with PayPhrase
What's this? | Create PayPhrase
More Buying Choices
18 used & new from $14.95

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology, No. 1)
 
 
Start reading History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology I on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology, No. 1) (Paperback)

~ Anatoly Fomenko (Author) "One often comes across accounts of a steel chisel found in the external masonry of the Great Pyramid of Cheops (Khufu, the beginning of XXX..." (more)
Key Phrases: global chronological map, dynastic jet, frequency damping principle, Jesus Christ, Titus Livy, Old Testament (more...)
4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (47 customer reviews)

Price: $19.95 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Only 5 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want it delivered Wednesday, November 18? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
6 new from $18.00 11 used from $14.95 1 collectible from $42.75

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
  Kindle Edition, March 19, 2007 $9.99 -- --
  Paperback, February 29, 2004 $19.95 $18.00 $14.95

Frequently Bought Together

History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology, No. 1) + History: Fiction or Science? Chronology 2 + History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Chronology III
Price For All Three: $83.35

Show availability and shipping details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Chronology III

History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Chronology III

by Dr Anatoly T. Fomenko et al
5.0 out of 5 stars (4)  $39.95
History: Fiction or Science? Chronology Vol.IV

History: Fiction or Science? Chronology Vol.IV

by Anatoly T.Fomenko
4.0 out of 5 stars (4)  $39.95
The Medieval Empire of the Israelites

The Medieval Empire of the Israelites

by V.Melamed R. Grishin
4.7 out of 5 stars (3)  $39.00
The Lost Millennium: History's Timetables Under Siege

The Lost Millennium: History's Timetables Under Siege

by Florin Diacu
The Gods of Eden

The Gods of Eden

by William Bramley
3.9 out of 5 stars (86)  $7.99
Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

Review

..deals with a very serious issue directly affecting humanity's comprehension of its own past.. -- Midwest Book Review (Oregon, WI USA),July 17, 2004

may appear controversial yet deals with a very serious issue directly affecting humanity's comprehension of its own past. -- Midwest Book Review (Oregon, WI USA),July 17, 2004
July 17, 2004


Product Description

`History: Fiction or Science?` is the most explosive tractate on history and chronology ever written.

This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data.

The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays.

You will be amazed to discover: - That the chronology universally taken for granted is indeed wrong; - That this chronology was essentially invented in the XVI-XVII century; - That archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts known today are erroneous or non-exact; - That there is not a single document that could be reliably dated earlier than the XIth century; - That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy; - That Jesus Christ may have been born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD; - That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of Middle Ages events; - That the Old Europe is not as ancient as it claims.

Henry Ford once said: "History is more or less bunk". Leading Mathematician Anatoly Fomenko proved it.


Product Details

  • Paperback: 624 pages
  • Publisher: Mithec (March 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 2913621058
  • ISBN-13: 978-2913621053
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 7 x 1.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (47 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #83,366 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

    #3 in  Books > Literature & Fiction > Poetry > Russian
    #9 in  Books > Biographies & Memoirs > People, A-Z > ( A ) > Augustine, Saint
    #15 in  Books > Literature & Fiction > Classics > Chinese

Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
"One often comes across accounts of a steel chisel found in the external masonry of the Great Pyramid of Cheops (Khufu, the beginning of XXX century b.c.); however, it is indeed most probable that said tool got there during a later age, when the pyramid stones were pillaged for building purposes." Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
global chronological map, dynastic jet, frequency damping principle, maxima correlation principle, ligerian chronology, sensual chronology, lunar shadow trajectory, small distortions principle, dynastic parallelisms, mediaeval chronology, phantom duplicates, inset between pages, alleged years, amplitude correlation principle, statistical duplicates, orbital wheels, reign durations, global chronicle, lunar elongation, mediaeval events, global chronology, dendrochronological scales, synodal translation, dependent chronicles, local maxima points
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Jesus Christ, Titus Livy, Old Testament, New Testament, Pulkovo Observatory, Italian Rome, Basil the Great, New Rome, Julius Caesar, Sir Isaac, Virgin Mary, Dionysius Petavius, Round Zodiac, Western Europe, Alexander the Great, Charles of Anjou, Dionysius the Little, Poggio Bracciolini, Milky Way, The Complete Russian Chronicles, Marcus Aurelius, Rudolf Habsburg, Antoninus Pius, Middle East, Octavianus Augustus
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:



What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(11)
(4)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

47 Reviews
5 star:
 (33)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (6)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.3 out of 5 stars (47 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
113 of 134 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A Pretty Wild Theory, February 22, 2005
By Timothy Horrigan "Tim Horrigan" (Durham, NH United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This book presents a wildly radical restructuring of the timeline of world history. It is written by an outsider to the world of historical scholarship: Fomenko is a non-historian (a renowned mathematician) and an non-Westerner (from Russia.)

Fomenko's theory says, basically, that everything we are told about history pre-1600 is BS. Ancient history is, according to Fomenko, based on evidence quote-unquote "discovered" since the 15th century and arranged into a spurious standard timeline in the 18th century. (In some cases, the evidence was discovered much more recently: some Eastern religious texts were only uncovered in the 20th century.) Fomenko collates this evidence to argue that all those ancient chronicles are different versions of events which really happened roughly between 1000 AD and 1400 AD. The key event in Fomenko's timeline is the life of Christ (who was born in 1053 AD rather than 6BC, Fomenko believes.) After a relatively short-lived Eurasian empire disintegrated, each nation made up their own version of the empire's history, and generally each new version of the story was set farther back into the past than the previous one. (The newest version is the Hindu Krishna myth which is set about 10,000 years before the present day.)

This is an appealing theory, since it eliminates the various "dark ages" which blemish the conventional chronology. On the other hand, this is an appalling theory, since it creates one big dark age extending from the beginning of time till 900 AD or so.

The book is translated from the Russian. There is no index, and the bibliography is rather annoyingly arranged in the original Russian alphabetical order (so for example, B's and V's are mixed together.) But the translation is extremely readable, more readable than most historical works originally written in English.

This is the first book in a projected 7-volume set.

The online bookstore entries for this volume rather amusingly show easily history gets mixed up. The translator is someone named Michael Jagger who is almost certainly not the singer Mick Jagger (whose full name is Michael Phillip Jagger.) However, some online bookstores do list Mick Jagger as a coauthor. Amazon.com says the translator is someone named Mike Jagupov. This is hard enough to keep straight while the singer is still alive, and a few decades from now, I am sure that many sources will say that the legendary Rolling Stones frontman translated this book into English.

(I have no idea if Mick Jagger speaks Russian or not. Although he is an educated man--- an alumnus of the University of London--- one would assume that he doesn't. Certainly, in all the millions of words which have been written about him, no one has commented on his knowledge of the Russian language. And, if he actually was the person who translated this controversial text into English, the book's publishers would presumably be aggressively advertising that fact.)

Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
54 of 62 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting theories that deserve to be explored, March 4, 2005
I do not agree with everything written in this book. For example, I do not agree with the idea that ankhs are supposed to be Christian crosses. I also disagree with the observations that different objects look like crescents and symbolize Islam. But there are a great number of valid observations contained in the book. Radiocarbon dating is not the science most of us think it is, as put forth in the book. I also have to agree with the author's idea that many pieces of evidence taken from old books and used to date people or events were either false and inserted by later editors, or otherwise erroneous. Let's face facts: the majority of ancient history is conjecture, or "educated guessing". It's about time an author came along and, in the author's own words, "called a spade a spade". Is this book 100% correct? Who knows? Do many of the theses contained within deserve further study? Yes, if history is to be a record of events and not propaganda or fuel for dogma. The more accurate we can make our history books, the better off other sciences will be, especially the humanities and any sciences concerned with gauging human progress in different areas throughout the ages. I give the book three stars mainly because I find some of the ideas put forth to be less than credible (the author shoud enlist other researchers with expertise in those areas besides math and physics), the translation to be not quite perfectly clear in some areas, and I dislike the organization of the book. The three stars are for the rest of the ideas and theories in the book that do make sense and deserve further exploration, or a reasoned rebuttal, especially the mathematical analysis of ancient texts. To the academics who summarily dismiss the book as rubbish...please point us to reasoned explanations. Us grown-ups who can read big words and read a book longer than a paperback novel deserve that much. Also, as an adult in this day and age, I will never just "take someone's word for it". How's that song go.."won't get fooled again!" I am especially waiting for someone to convince me that radiocarbon dating is worth using on objects less than many thousands of years old. I doubt it's going to happen!
Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
114 of 136 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Don't review if you haven't read , February 3, 2005
You learned history when you were a young lad from someone who learned it from someone who..... but who started it all?
What's wrong with asking this question? Some people would burn Mr. Fomenko at the stake for saying the Earth isn't flat.

I bought this book as a novelty but I ended up being quite impressed with it. I wouldn't say I'm totally sold on all the crazy ideas Mr. fomenko puts out but they certainly are more plausable than you might think. He does a thorough job of showing how early "historians" were really working for the pope. Most were monks with limited resources, personal and religious agendas, and a willingness to fudge it whenever they didn't know (or like) the truth. You'll be amazed at how meticulously he presents his evidence that the dark ages were so dark because they never happened. Your head will probably start to ache when you get to the section where he analyzes historical timelines statistically (at least mine did). However, the parallels truly are startling.

The first four chapters alone are worth the price of the book. Even if you don't believe any of it I'm sure you will at least question why we take the foundations of historical knowledge so seriously without solid justification. There's more to this book than you could know without actually reading it!
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

1.0 out of 5 stars The Above Reviews are Phoney
It's some writer working under a pseudonym, getting writer-friends to write these horrible, long-winded reviews.
Published 1 month ago by Jia Gu Wen

1.0 out of 5 stars typical pseudoscience
Some people are able to believe in everything what seems to be logic and supported by some equations and statistics. Read more
Published 4 months ago by mjare

1.0 out of 5 stars A total sham, consiracy theory wannabe.
This guy claims basically all of recorded history is manufactured as a devious plan to misinform. Sorry bud, I just can't accept your conclusions, there are millions if not... Read more
Published 5 months ago by J. White

1.0 out of 5 stars NONSENSE
WE ALL KNOW THAT STATISTICS IS A METHOD OF INTERPRETATION.
THERE ARE DOZENS OF BOOKS NAMED "LYING WITH STATISTICS"
Published 11 months ago by Nebojsa Kostic

1.0 out of 5 stars Some people will swallow anything
Looking through this book reminded me of the movie "A Beautiful Mind". A brilliant mathematician constructs a fantasy world complete in every detail. Read more
Published 13 months ago by Amazon Man

1.0 out of 5 stars absolute garbage
this book is absolute garbage. the author has no concept of history and completely disregards the archaeological and historical record. Read more
Published 14 months ago by Wesley S. Foster

5.0 out of 5 stars Treading on sore toes?
The professional historians faint as prominent mathematician Doctor Fomenko et al research the known historical data and come to fairly controversial conclusions... Read more
Published 22 months ago by Caesar Khan

5.0 out of 5 stars Has history been tampered with?
Customer Video Review

Length:: 8:50 Mins

Published on October 23, 2007 by Donald Reygan

5.0 out of 5 stars Pants on fire?
Will people ever read before spamming? Yes, Jesuits could not rewrite world history alone, they had help. Anyway, Dr Prof Acad A. Read more
Published on July 19, 2007 by Polina Filippov

5.0 out of 5 stars Accepted History & Chronology Must Be Changed.
There is no doubt that history as most know it is a sham, & institution's version of History both University & Church is fradulent & inaccurate. Read more
Published on April 8, 2007 by J. Boljanac Mandres

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Welcome to the History: Fiction or Science? forum 5 December 2007
See all discussions...  
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
   



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

History: Fiction or Science?

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. George Orwell Scaliger seduced me; chronological studies, as I see, terrify me. Iohannes Kepler Be wary of mathematiciens, particularly when they speak the truth. ...

Number Of Pages: 624;  Publisher: Mithec;  Author: Anatoly Fomenko; ...

(Report this)
Created on Feb 15, 2007, last edited on Feb 15, 2007.

 Read More and Edit at Amapedia.com opens new browser window



Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.