|
|
8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Good Video, Bad History, June 8, 2007
The film is a marvelous visual and audio production, but from a historical perspective, there is no balance whatsoever. The writers of the film seem to have adopted the historical interpretation of the Battle of Franklin from Wiley Sword's highly subjective and fact-filtered book, The Confederacy's Last Hurrah. Sword set the standard for selective disclosure and historical concealment in his otherwise eloquently written award winning book.
The name "Hood" is mentioned 54 times in the 68 minute production, making him the most prominent character in the film. Although the film relies heavily on verbatim quotes from Battle of Franklin veterans and others, of the 58 total quotes in the documentary, the oft mentioned Hood is allowed only three quotes. One quote concerns his relationship with his fiancé, which is unrelated to anything else in the film, and the other two quotes are followed immediately with derisive comments from the narrator.
The film states that Hood conspired to replace Joseph Johnston as commander of the AOT. The film doesn't reveal that William Hardee, AP Stewart, Leonidas Polk, and Joe Wheeler also disapproved of the retreating tactics that cost Johnston his job. Hardee wrote to Jefferson Davis in June 1864, "If the present system continues we may find ourselves at Atlanta before a serious battle is fought." Hood wrote similar letters, yet he is the only Johnston subordinate accused of backstabbing his superior.
The film's writers only included quotes from Hood's critics, while concealing words of support and admiration for Hood from both Confederate and Union veterans, as well as Confederate governors and presidents. Pvt. Sam Watkins of the 1st Tennessee Infantry wrote of Hood in his memoirs, "He (Hood) was a noble, brave and good man, and we loved him for his virtues and goodness of heart." "We all loved Hood; he was such a clever fellow, and a good man." "Every impulse of his (Hood's) nature was to do good and to serve his country as best he could." No such comments appear in the film.
Hood is portrayed as a commander who preferred frontal assaults, when in fact Franklin was the only frontal attack Hood ever ordered as a commander.
The film paints Hood as a cold and ruthless commander, saying he "bled his boys" in Virginia when witnesses recorded Hood openly grieving for his men at every one of his previous battles.
Regarding the Tennessee Campaign, Spring Hill, and Franklin, the film gives many quotes and testimony from characters, but silences Gen. Hood completely. He recorded the reasons for his decisions in his Official Reports and memoirs, but the film censors him. Hood wrote in his OR, "I learned from dispatches captured at Spring Hill, from Thomas to Schofield, that the latter was instructed to hold that place till the position at Franklin could be made secure, indicating the intention of Thomas to hold Franklin and his strong works at Murfreesboro. Thus I knew that it was all important to attack Schofield before he could make himself strong, and if he should escape at Franklin he would gain his works about Nashville. The nature of the position was such as to render it inexpedient to attempt any further flank movement, and I therefore determined to attack him in front, and without delay."
At Spring Hill, many Confederates held Hood blameless for the Federal escape, yet the film states that Hood "allowed" the Union army to escape. Franklin veteran S.A. Cunningham wrote in 1893, "...the march to Spring Hill, where the Federal retreat was so nearly cut off, a failure for which it was understood General Hood was not to blame, created an enthusiasm for him equal to that entertained for Stonewall Jackson after his extrordinary achievements...The soldiers were full of ardor, and confident of success. They had unbounded faith in General Hood, whom they believed would achieve a victory that would give us Nashville." Such testimony is absent in the film.
At Franklin, the film outrageously says that Hood "sacrificed" his men, when many veterans-Union and Confederate-supported Hood's decision to attack, but like others, they too are silenced.
Perhaps Hood's performance in the Tennessee Campaign was best summarized by Tennessee Gov. Isham Harris, who accompanied the AOT on the campaign. Harris wrote to Jefferson Davis, "I have been with General Hood from the beginning of this campaign, and beg to say, disastrous as it has ended, I am not able to see anything that General Hood has done that he should not, or neglected anything that he should have done which it was possible to do. Indeed, the more that I have seen and known of him and his policy, the more I have been pleased with him and regret to say that if all had performed their parts as well as he, the results would have been very different." Like other Hood supporters, Harris isn't quoted in the film.
The final words of the documentary include, "At Franklin, it (the Army of Tennessee) had almost wrecked itself in an attack that should never have been ordered." Union veteran L.A. Simmons of the 84th Illinois wrote that at Franklin, "He (Hood) was playing a stupendous game, for enormous stakes. Could he have succeeded in breaking the center, our whole army was at his mercy. In our rear was a deep and rapid river, swollen by recent rains- and to retreat across it an utter impossibility. To break the center was to defeat our army; and defeat inevitably involved a surrender, and Nashville was at his mercy, and could be taken in a day. His army well understood that they were fighting for the possession of Nashville. Ours knew they were fighting to preserve that valuable city, and to avoid annihilation." Although the battle was a tragic and decisive defeat for Gen. Hood, the decision to attack was not without justification.
If the documentary was intended to be purely entertainment, it is successful; if the intent was to educate, it has only given one side of the story.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|