Industrial-Sized Deals TextBTS15 Shop Women's Handbags Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon Andra Day Fire TV Stick Subscribe & Save Find the Best Purina Pro Plan for Your Pet Shop Popular Services tmnt tmnt tmnt  Amazon Echo Starting at $99 Kindle Voyage Metal Gear Solid 5 Shop Now Deal of the Day
nikon 55-200 versus 70-300 vr lens Is the price difference justified between these 2 lens?
asked by Faye S. Cox on January 9, 2010
Sort: Most Helpful first | Newest first | Oldest first
Showing 1-8 of 8 answers
Owning both the 55-200VR and the 70-300VR and have compared not only both but two copies of the 55-200 on two Nikon DX cameras against the 70-300. Viewing was done on two hi-def monitors (25" and 27") using close to two thousand pics. Bottom line- the 70-300 blows away the 55-200. It is not even close. The MUCH heavier 70-300 is considerably sharper, colors are balanced and accurate (as they are on the 55-200) but much richer, brighter, with better contrast and much better bokeh. Skin tones and portraits in particular are wonderful with the 70-300.
Downside on the 70-300 is that it is heavier. I have read some comments that the 70-300 begins losing sharpness after 200mm but my copy is super sharp at all focal lengths. If you are a serious amature and can justify the price go for the 70-300.
T. Irwin answered on February 19, 2012
Comment | 16 of 16 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

I owned the 70-300VR for a year and sold it. I bought the 55-200VR and still have it after a year.
For me, an amateur photographer of general life pictures, I did not like the size and weight of the 70-300. I ended up not using it much and therefore decided to sell it. However, the pictures were beautiful. In it's favor are the bokeh and contrast.
Otherwise, I find the little brother 55-200 more suitable for me hands down. I prefer the range, light weight, low price, and overall picture quality was more than good enough. If I were to do primarily bugs, birds type, then the 70-300 would be more suited.
David L. answered on May 22, 2010
Comment | 16 of 17 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

Yes, the two lenses are worlds apart. The 70-300 is a top quality 'prosumer' lens, intended for advanced amateurs and pros on a budget; worth every penny! The 55-200 is an affordable, 'entry level' lens and an excellent value.
Robert G. Weiniger answered on November 8, 2010
Comment | 12 of 12 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

A lot depends on what you like to shoot. The 300 is far more useful for wildlife or sports and it was worth it for me. Read my review.
Amazon Customer answered on January 10, 2010
Comment | 6 of 6 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

I have the 55 200 vr and the 70 300 vr. I like them both but if I had to get rid of one it would be the 55 200. There is no comparison in the build quality,, you get what you pay for. The 70 300 is heavy but I'm not even close to a pro photog and don't wag one around for long periods of time.
James R. Mills answered on August 20, 2010
Comment | 3 of 3 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

I have the non-VR version of both, and I personally prefer the 70-300. I got the gray market version of the 70-300 for $110...that's a deal right there. You can get that AND the 55-200mm VR and come out paying the same as you would for just the 70-300mm VR. Also, the focal range covered (55-200mm = 82.5-300mm) and (70-300=105-450mm) is much greater with the 70-300 on a DX.
VR is important, yes, but with my D90 and its battery grip, I don't have much trouble getting sharp shots at 300mm and 200mm at 1/60 with either of them, respectively.

The size difference is considerable in your bag as well. The 70-300 is rather large.
Jimmy Lamont answered on May 12, 2010
Comment (1) | Do you find this helpful?  Yes No | Report abuse

If I were to purchase the D3000, which I be okay with the lense that it comes with? Or should I buy the 55-200 right out of the gate?
Nicole M. Cesa answered on September 7, 2010
Comment | 1 of 2 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

Absolutely. The larger one is heavy but not too. Big $$$ difference. The VR works well. Great lens for most applications..
Amazon Customer answered on May 1, 2011
Comment | 0 of 2 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse
‹ Previous   1   Next ›

See all questions about this product