I heard that if you send proof to Baez that you bought his book, he will send you a check for a hundred dollars. If you write a five star review on the book, he will send you the check AND a bikini left over from his failed "Brazilian Bikinis" business.
I read that.. He is really quite delusional.. There are sooo many things he got wrong in that article.... I think i need to make a log in there and post a few of them.. Im working on a list of lies in the book that can be proven to be lies..by documentation.... but there are alot and the research takes a bit.. .
rlug, I read that article. I have no words to express the deep disgust I feel for this co-author. Casey said this, and Casey said that...like it's the freakin' truth! He even bought into the South Park story regarding sex abuse. I only wish George could sue both of them for every single penny they have. This guy is as bad as Baez, and that is saying something. The both of them making money off the death of a child by fabricating lurid lies about her grandfather makes my blood boil. Perhaps some day someone will accuse them of sex abuse. Then we'll see how important evidence suddenly becomes. I can't imagine how they sleep at night, and cash in their royalty checks by day.
It just does not stop. I just went back and watched George Anthony's first testimony w/ Jeff Ashton and Jose Baez. Ya know how recently Jose and Mason have been going on about how George never denied the abuse allegation when baez and Mason first brought it up to him directly? AS I have stated before I am not surprised at all he would not engage with these two about this claim and I am sure he had been given legal advice on top of that NOT to engage with them re: the allegation.
But recently on In Session on the "Anniversary of Casey's Acquittal" Mason says that it really shocked him when George said in testimony that the "first time he had heard of the abuse" was a few minutes prior right there in the courtroom. Well I went back and actually listened to that testimony and as per usual they are taking things just slightly out of context t try and make something seem different than it really is. WHAT it was that George said that he had only just heard in the courtroom for the first time was the story of him supposedly bringing a wet Caylee to Casey and screaming what have you done. THAT was what he was referring to NOT the sexual allegations. Because those we KNOW he had FIRST heard about via Cindy because of her one on one w/ Baez.
And I am also sure in listening to the whole thing including Baez' disgusting opening that THEY PURPOSEFULLY held that back from George because they were hoping to just throw him off somehow and were hoping he would do a George and would say something they could also twist into being something it was not. This is just disgusting folks.
And NOW they wanna try and say that he denied having heard of the abuse allegations in court when he never said anything of the sort? If you believe your position Mr Baez , Mr Mason, then why make up stuff? Why is that at all necessary?