Mr. Dinesh D'Souza was actually born in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India of Roman Catholic parents who hail from Goa, a small colony of Portugal on India's western coast until it was forcibly occupied and annexed by India in 1961. It is plain from his background that Mr. D'Souza's secretly craves to ruled by Europeans, and that his lingering resentment over India's takeover of Goa fuels his deep-seated hostility to multiethnic, pluralistic, democratic societies--such as India and the United States. This emerged with shocking clarity in his 2007 book, "The Enemy At Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11", where Mr. D'Souza's warm admiration for Islamists, and sickening apologias for their terrorism caused even many conservatives to retch. (But that was then; now the Right has mostly joined Mr. D'Souza in his well-documented rabid hatred of America's liberty and pluralism.)
Mr. D'Souza's very surname indicates that his Roman Catholic faith is the morbid, knee-jerk authoritarian, Iberian variety that inspired the forced conversion or expulsion of Jews from the Iberian peninsula over five-hundred years ago. Merely on the basis of this, a disinterested observer can conclude that Mr. D'Souza is really a secret anti-Semite. His anti-Jewish views are so well-known, and so cunningly concealed, that no evidence of them even exists--as yet.
Similarly, Mr. D'Souza was no doubt imbued by his parents with India's rigid caste system, which taught him to look down on those with dark skins--including perhaps even himself, possibly subconciously. The lowest caste, 'Untouchables' (now called Dalits)--who tend to be of Dravidian extraction and dark-skinned--are restricted to the lowliest occupations (such as street sweeper or latrine cleaner) and are held to be ritually polluting to higher castes (even if their shadows should fall on a member of a higher caste!). They are routinely subjected to discrimination, even murder. Perhaps this color- and caste-consciousness explains Mr. D'Souza's infamous whitewash (no pun intended) of black slavery and segregation in the U.S., contained in another of his previous tomes, "The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society" Here, Mr. D'Souza helpfully explains that slavery and segregation were both actually good for black Americans. (They protected blacks from even worse treatment, you see.) It appears that Mr. D'Souza has transferred his notion that a dark skin signals social inferiority from an Indian to an American context where this does not (or at least should not) exist. The secret fear of being 'tainted' by an inferior caste, and the secret resentment of a man of color being elected U.S. President (a man whose skin tone is lighter that Mr. D'Souza's--oh, the ignominy!) may ultimately be at the root of Mr. D'Souza's rage. This fetid whirlpool of hatred and self-hatred may even explain his latest witless screed. It appears from it that Mr. D'Souza has been doing some latrine cleaning himself.
The facts stated here are from multiple, varied, and authoritative references; I defy anyone to disprove any of them. They are at least as rock-solid as anything in "The Roots of Obama's Rage".
I believe a fair and balanced look at the available (and unavailable) evidence indicates that Mr. D'Souza is a dangerous foreign agent who was primed by his parents to disrupt and discombobulate the American society that took them in. His 'naturalization' papers should be openly divulged and minutely scrutinized for anything that might serve as a convenient pretext to deport him back to his native India. May we also please see his baptismal certificate? My hunch is that Mr. D'Souza is a secret Muslim!