Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
113 of 117 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Splendid - but caveat lector, June 13, 2005
This new book on the great Augustine enthralled and puzzled me, sometimes on the same page. I strongly recommend it for readers who have already read Peter Brown's incomparable biography of Augustine, and perhaps also a book on Manicheism--my personal favourite remains the great study by Hans Jonas, although since Nag Hammadi there have been many more recent books based upon the Gnostic texts discovered at Nag Hammadi. For readers who are already familiar with Brown's biography, this is a splendid updating of the facts about Augustine's life. But I would not recommend it for readers just learning about Augustine, for example somebody who has just read THE CONFESSIONS and now wants to learn more about Augustine himself. The best biography (as O'Donnell himself generously acknowledges in a footnote of this book) remains the Peter Brown biography.
One of the key features of this book is the availability of new research, and new material, not available to Peter Brown when he wrote his great book(s) on Augustine and late antiquity. O'Donnell is immersed in seemingly all the scholarship on Augustine and on subjects related to Augustine, and O'Donnell brings a mature and considered judgment to his consideration of Augustine's life and work.
Having said that, I do have the following caveat, which is why I recommend O'Donnell's book as a supplement, but not a substitute, for the Brown biography: O'Donnell's tone veers from learned and ironic and amused to being slightly sardonic, even cynical about Augustine.
I remember reading A.N. Wilson's biographies of Tolstoy and C.S. Lewis and feeling very satisfied when I had finished; over time, however, I realised that Wilson had subtlely diminished his subjects and that I had lost much of my esteem for Tolstoy and Lewis as a result of having read Wilson's biographies of them. There is an underlying tone in this book which is similar to Wilson's tone, although O' Donnell is not as corrosive. Perhaps a better match to O'Donnell's tone is the biography PAUL: A CRITICAL LIFE by Jerome Murphy-O'Connor. Like Murphy-O'Connor, O'Donnell is a real authority on his subject, with a career's worth of reflection to add to his real expertise in the primary and secondary sources--he has read and thought about the gamut of facts and interpretations offered on his subject. But Murphy-O'Connor doesn't share Paul's religious faith--his Christianity is much more attenuated than was that of Paul, and that seems to be the case as well with O'Donnell and Augustine. (A few years after his biography of C.S. Lewis, Wilson publicly declared himself to be an atheist). So be prepared for a certain distance, a certain scepticism and even cynicism in this book.
Having said all that, I really admired O'Donnell's magisterial grasp of his material and his profound, considered take on Augustine, his work, and his world. What I considered the flaws in the tone spring from an interpretation which, while it may not be shared by all readers (I certainly don't share it), will not obscure the many wondrous insights that O'Donnell offers, insights which leave me admiring Augustine all the more.
|
|
|
78 of 90 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Modernism's Shortcomings Revealed, January 3, 2006
"Modernism" gets a bad name from "Augustine" by James O'Donnell. Subtitled "A New Biography," it has little new but for oppressing the reader with the prejudices, peeves and contemptuousness of the anti-religious "modern."
The book's undertaking is ambitious: drag Christianity's most prominent thinker into the trash of modernism; tear down the Bishop of Hippo with sniffy skepticism; mock the model for centuries of penitents; make fools of those inspired by Saint Augustine's fusion of Platonic and Jewish traditions that became the philosophical foundation of the Western religious culture.
The author of this book, O'Donnell, would seem to have the credentials: he wrote volume upon volume of annotations, largely unnoticed, about Saint Augustine's "Confessions." The chapter titles and subtitles of O'Donnell's book taunt the great doctor of Catholicism: "Augustine the Self-Promoter," Augustine the Social Climber," "Augustine and the Invention of Christianity."
O'Donnell's book is the self-proclaimed "modern" understanding of Augustine, as in "modern attitudes," "moderns commonly say of Augustine," and "the dawn of the twentieth century's psychological age" (whatever that is).
O'Donnell's modernism has its own definitions and perspectives, which he claims can explain history "with ideas of rigor, objectivity and truth." But that claim highlights the book's lack of credibility, because O'Donnell's "Augustine" is so obviously the subjective, downright kooky ruminations of O'Donnell, not just on Saint Augustine, but upon all of Christianity and even all of history.
Thus, in O'Donnell's modern interpretation, Augustine becomes "a Don Quixote in a world that really takes him and his obsessions seriously;" Christianity becomes a "community of obsessives" or "like a bowling league or a condominium association;" and history for O'Donnell becomes something explained not "with ideas of rigor, objectivity and truth," but rather occasion for O'Donnell's flights of fantasy, literally. Throughout the book, O'Donnell asks that we join him in his own petty, modernist alternative realities of the past, in page after page of O'Donnell's drag-in-the-dirt brand of "what if?"
O'Donnell tries to preach his "modern" viewpoint with catchy contemporary references and definitions. Classifying pagans is equated with labeling one a "Pinko." On the death of a friend, Augustine reverts to "sex, drugs and rock and roll." Every possible heresy of the time is capitalized (along with "Pagans"), e.g. Donatists, Pelagians and Gnostics. But O'Donnell finds the license to spell "catholics" throughout. Ultimately O'Donnell's "modern" definitions are pretentious, contemptuous and profoundly ignorant, and it simply gets boring wading through O'Donnell's "modern" theses, little more than pedestrian psycho-babble, liberal political correctness and academic pomposity.
Any subsequent biography of Augustine will be compared to Peter Brown's work. The comparison here is very instructive. Written in 1962, Brown's "Augustine of Hippo," like its subject, has stood up well to time. Brown wrote about Augustine with a timeless human reference. Where O'Donnell provides cheap quips, Brown tells us that Augustine "had chosen to see the great complexity of his own view on grace and free will, veiled to the unenquiring mind, a source of wonder to the philosopher." O'Donnell's central interests are mundane human sexuality, ambition and weakness; Brown probes a mind and life consumed in a beatific vision of true human happiness in the illumination of a timeless God (O'Donnell's "god"). Peter Brown presents a human person easily recognizable as he passes through the ages of his life while leaving a posit of millions of words that still resonate with those living today, just as O'Donnell's "modern" retrospection on Augustine will be so quickly forgotten.
O'Donnell's "Augustine" is a mean book by an author without capacity. If it reveals the truly modern man, he is not someone you would want to meet.
|
|
|
28 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
The Naked Augustine, March 3, 2006
T. van Bavel once compiled a bibliography of all the books and articles published about St. Augustine from 1950 to 1960. It is at least twice the size of O'Donnell's book. And this is a just a list of bibliographical info plus brief descriptions of content. Imagine how thick all those books and articles must have been! Let's see: mutliply all that by 4 and 1/2, and you get a rough estimate of how erudite you have to be now to write an adequate biography of the greatest Christian thinker after St. Paul. If an author on St. Augustine ends up playing the role of one of the six blind men trying to describe an elephant, he has a lot of company.
This much I can grant to anyone who tries to present all about St. Augustine in fewer than 400 pages. What I am more reluctant to concede is a treatment of the man and his thought that recasts him and it as a practitioner of cheap journalism might do to a leading public figure today. Augustine comes out of this book stripped of his own garments--exposed, as they say today, or cheapened, as I say. He's even worse than naked: he is reclothed in contemporary undress--just enough on to make him lurid.
As other reviewers here, I do not recommend this book for Augustine beginners. Try not Peter Brown but the third edition of Gerald Bonner's "St. Augustine of Hippo". And when you feel ready for a recent and really erudite, not sensationalist, study, read Serge Lancel's "St. Augustine".
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|