Misquoting Jesus and over 360,000 other books are available for Amazon Kindle – Amazon’s new wireless reading device. Learn more

 

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
Express Checkout with PayPhrase
What's this? | Create PayPhrase
More Buying Choices
79 used & new from $6.76
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Plus)
 
 
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book
Start reading Misquoting Jesus on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Plus) (Paperback)

~ (Author)
Key Phrases: disputed verses, copying practices, last twelve verses, New Testament, Son of God, Luke's Gospel (more...)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (423 customer reviews)
List Price: $14.95
Price: $10.76 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $4.19 (28%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Want it delivered Tuesday, November 24? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
49 new from $7.50 30 used from $6.76

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
  Kindle Edition, February 3, 2009 $9.99 -- --
  Hardcover, October 31, 2005 $18.96 $6.98 $3.99
  Paperback, February 4, 2007 $10.76 $7.50 $6.76
  Audio, Download Offsite Link $20.98 or less with new Audible membership

Frequently Bought Together

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Plus) + Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them) + Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament
Price For All Three: $41.50

Show availability and shipping details

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)

Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)

by Bart D. Ehrman
3.7 out of 5 stars (150)  $17.15
Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament

Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament

by Bart D. Ehrman
4.3 out of 5 stars (42)  $13.59
Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew

Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew

by Bart D. Ehrman
4.2 out of 5 stars (116)  $13.59
God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer

God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer

by Bart D. Ehrman
3.8 out of 5 stars (146)  $11.55
Misquoting Truth: A Guide to the Fallacies of Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus"

Misquoting Truth: A Guide to the Fallacies of Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus"

by Timothy Paul Jones
3.1 out of 5 stars (46)  $11.25
› Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Though himself schooled in evangelical literalism, Ehrman has come to regard his earlier faith in the inerrant inspiration of the Bible as misguided, given that the original texts have disappeared and that the extant texts available do not agree with one another. Most of the textual discrepancies, Ehrman acknowledges, matter little, but some do profoundly affect religious doctrine. To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants. In discounting not only the authenticity of existing manuscripts but also the inspiration of the original writers, Ehrman will deeply divide his readers. Although he addresses a popular audience, he undercuts the very religious attitudes that have made the Bible a popular book. Still, this is a useful overview for biblical history collections. Bryce Christensen
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.


Review

"Offers a fascinating look into the field of textual criticism and evidence that Scriptures have been altered." -- Charleston Post & Courier

"One of the unlikeliest bestsellers of the year." -- Washington Post

"Whichever side you sit on regarding Biblical inerrancy, this is a rewarding read." -- Dallas Morning News --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

  • Paperback: 242 pages
  • Publisher: HarperOne (February 6, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0060859512
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060859510
  • Product Dimensions: 7.9 x 5.2 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 5.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (423 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #5,322 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category: (What's this?)

    #9 in  Books > Religion & Spirituality > Religious Studies > History

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Bart D. Ehrman
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Bart D. Ehrman Page
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:
Inside This Book (learn more)
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
disputed verses, copying practices, last twelve verses, pagan opponents
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
New Testament, Son of God, Luke's Gospel, Mark's Gospel, Against Celsus, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of John, Jesus Christ, Latin Vulgate, Jewish Bible, Old Testament, Middle Ages, Johannine Comma, Textus Receptus, Codex Sinaiticus, Son of Man, Roman Empire, God of the Jews, Justin Martyr, Asia Minor, Complutensian Polyglot, Jewish God, Greek Testament, Law of God, Jesus God
New!
Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:
Citations (learn more)
8 books cite this book:
See all 8 books citing this book

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Plus)
85% buy the item featured on this page:
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Plus) 4.0 out of 5 stars (423)
$10.76
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)
8% buy
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them) 3.7 out of 5 stars (150)
$17.15
God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer
3% buy
God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer 3.8 out of 5 stars (146)
$11.55
Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament
2% buy
Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament 4.3 out of 5 stars (42)
$13.59
Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(39)
(39)
(37)
(32)
(30)
(28)
(28)
(26)
(24)
(6)
Agree with these tags?
See all 38 tags...

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags
 

Customer Reviews

423 Reviews
5 star:
 (214)
4 star:
 (101)
3 star:
 (45)
2 star:
 (23)
1 star:
 (40)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (423 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
598 of 657 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A Very Engaging Book, January 3, 2006
This review is from: Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Hardcover)
This is the first book of Ehrman's I have read. I found it interesting and well-written for the average person who has little background in Biblical Textual Studies, (which equates to more than 99% of the population.)

I do not have the credentials of Dr. Ehrman, but I do have the equivalent of a degree in Biblical Literature and have worked in the original languages. My Senior Thesis was doing a textual comparison of the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas discovered at Nag Hammadi with the parallel passages of the Kingdom Parables of Matthew 13. To do that I had to teach myself some Coptic Egyptian and do some translating to form a basis for comparison.

All that said to establish that I have some background to make an evaluation of what is being said in this book.

I also have some common ground with Dr. Ehrman in life history. I too was trained as an evangelical with a very high view of inspiration and further had to struggle as I became aware of how difficult it is to interact with the text in its manuscript and historical form all while becoming painfully aware of the fact that any view of inspiration must tacitly admit that it is a hypothetical basis of faith because as Ehrman states clearly:

1. If the original manuscripts are inspired, we don't have them.

2. What we do have, while overall reliable and fairly easily examined for error, still leaves some serious questions of textual manipulation by scribes that makes several key passages difficult to stand upon for important doctrines.

This is, in fact, not as great a secret as Ehrman seems to imply throughout his book. There are a great number of books from all backgrounds and degrees of belief that acknowledge these types of issues. Granted, they tend to be more of an academic nature than what Ehrman has attempted to do here. But they are there nonetheless and have been for centuries.

Jefferson's Bible was an early example (though not necessarily intended for distribution at the time) of how people wrestled with this issue. The means of wrestling with them have improved with additional manuscripts discovered (i.e. the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hammadi to name the better known ones.) Scholarship has improved to where I believe it is safe to say that what we know in this realm today has improved our confidence in most areas of the text.

In fact, the newer translations themselves (The NIV, the NASB etc.), actually have margin notes and some variant readings noted very clearly in just the areas that Ehrman focuses on within his book. That hardly equates to a "cover-up."

In view of this, I think Ehrman somewhat oversteps his points in favor of salesmanship to try and press home his own doubts that have arisen in his personal journey. Most Christians have many tools, books, websites, and Bibles themselves to be introduced to these types of issues (IF they want to be.) This is an issue well within the grasp of the average layman if they should be interested in pursuing it.

There are many conservative scholars with equally distinguished academic backgrounds that match Ehrman's and yet still maintain a higher view of Scripture than he appears to have adopted. I accept that his views are well informed and sincere. I do not accept his conclusion that inspiration of the original text requires equally divine preservation. However, in recognizing that I accept that the onus is on those of my persuasion to provide solid scholarship to demonstrate our case. I believe that is being provided. I would encourage any reading this book to listen to what Ehrman has to say and do some research on what others of a more conservative approach and respect for Scripture have to say as well. In this regard, even Bruce Metzger, Ehrman's mentor to whom he dedicates the book has a somewhat more conservative view and conclusion based on the same criteria.

The primary and most valuable point that I think Ehrman makes in this work, is that there are many Christians in denial either through ignorance or worse, perhaps an unwillingness to face these issues for fear of upsetting their internal house of cards and being forced to admit that there are unanswered questions and room for some intellectual honesty and humility in facing difficult issues related to the Bible.

There are many Christians, unfortunately who prefer denial to honest appraisal. Ehrman very rightly confronts this with his material.

As an evangelical who has retained and maintained his faith in this journey, I haven't found it necessary to resort to denial. There are satisfactory answers to be found. It does, however, require a willingness to adopt some humility and to honestly rethink and modify positions when the facts call for it. That is not a bad thing. In fact, I think it's a good thing and results in a deeper, more understanding, more relevent and intellectually honest faith that can move and interact within our society and culture without apology. I don't believe God intends for his people to be mental midgets or follow their faith mindlessly.

That having been said, I didn't find the text offensive or threatening for that matter. I think he does a good job of raising the points on the major issues without overly sensationalizing them beyond what I have qualified above. His facts are reasonably sound and accurate, even if they are somewhat selective. His conclusions in places seem to be somewhat hastily arrived at, but I'm willing to give him some latitude due to his goal of making this easily grasped by the average person with no formal training.

Worth the read. Hopefully any reading this as an introduction to the field will not stop here but go on to explore and learn more. Metzger is good, Gordon Fee is good. FF Bruce also has some good material, but there are many others if you want to enter the field more deeply and see some differing persepctives.

Evangelicals, (such as myself) need to read and interact with these types of books and enter the field as participants in the debate rather than naysayers throwing verbal salvos from behind our walls of faith, security and (unfortunately at times) ignorance.

Read it and be introduced into an important field of knowledge.
Comment Comments (49) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
1,215 of 1,412 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Another home run for Ehrman!, November 13, 2005
By Steven W. Cooper (Smithville, TN United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Hardcover)
In a little over 200 pages, Ehrman gets to the point of how the New Testament came to be what it is today. No, it didn't just appear leather-bound, shiny, and new after Jesus' resurrection; rather, it was painstakingly cobbled together decades after Jesus' crucifixion from copies of copies of copies of (you get the point) the original writings of the New Testament authors, which were slowly altered over time by scribes that handed them down (sometimes by accident or othertimes intentionally by those meaning to "correct" things in the scriptures that didn't make sense). All in all, Ehrman makes his case well, that even if the New Testament scriptures started out as the inspired word of God, we humans have certainly gotten our filthy little hands on it and have made it quite difficult to discern what the "original" writers (whose texts have been lost) actually wrote. Thus, we can only try to piece it together through the challenging art of textual criticism, which is what this book is largely about.
Comment Comments (20) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
169 of 195 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent starting place for anyone wishing to know about New Testament textual criticism and the problems with the texts!, December 8, 2005
By Yoda (London) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Hardcover)
Ehrman's book can be described as an introduction to New Testament textual criticism for the beginners, in which he explains the subject in the context of his own background, relating his journey from being an Evangelical Christian to becoming a world renowned New Testament scholar. Besides D. C. Parker's "Living Text of the Gospels," Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" seems to be the only book on textual criticism designed specifically for the non-expert readers.

In short, Prof. Ehrman explains the copying practises of the earliest period and how the texts of the New Testament writings were corrupted as they were copied and recopied. He begins by introducing the diverse writings produced by the early Christians, such as gospels, Acts, apocalypses, Church orders, apologies etc. Briefly, the formation of the canon is also discussed and we are informed about the literacy level among the early Christians. Thereafter we are introduced to the world of the copyists and Ehrman explains how the early scribes copied texts and the problems associated with the copying of texts.

It is quite interesting to learn that even pagan critics of Christianity, such as Celsus, were quite aware at an early date that the Christian writings were being corrupted by the scribes and even Origen had to complain about the numerous differences between the gospel manuscripts. Marcion, an early Christian, corrupted the text of certain New Testament writings available to him and Dionysius is quoted who complains that his own writings have been modified just as "the word of the Lord" had been tampered. Marcion, of course, accused other Christians of corrupting the texts. In an earlier writings, "The Orthodox Corruption of Scriptures", Ehrman demonstrated in detail how proto-orthodox Christians corrupted the New Testament writings on occasions. It seems that the early Christians were quite aware that the writings in their possession had underwent corruption and were still being corrupted and they frequently accused each other of tampering with the texts.

I was quite surprised to learn how statistically small additions or deletions within the text changed the entire meaning of passages and even books. Ehrman discusses at length certain examples in this regard and shows that even unintentional changes can result in changes that change the meaning of texts. A previous disgruntled reviewer said that "all of the basic beliefs of the faith are clearly outlined throughout the New Testament and are not in any way in question." However, Ehrman lists a number of theologically important issues which rest upon textually uncertain passages. To quote Ehrman (pp. 207-208):

"It would be wrong, however, to say - as people sometimes do - that the changes in our text have no real bearing on what the texts mean or on the theological conclusions that one draws from them. We have seen, in fact, that just the opposite is the case. In some instances, the very meaning is at stake depending on how one resolves a textual problem: Was Jesus an angry man? Was the completely distraught in the face of death? Did he tell his disciples that they could drink poison without being harmed? Did he let an adulteress off the hook with nothing but a mild warning? Is the doctrine of the Trinity explicitly taught in the New Testament? Is Jesus actually called the "unique God" there? Does the New Testament indicate that even the Son of God does not know when the end will come? The questions go on and on, and all of them are related to how one resolves difficulties in the manuscript tradition as it has come down to us."

The above are just a few problems. Another interesting problem is whether the doctrine of the atonement is taught in the gospel according to Luke? Further, there are immense textual problems with passages such as the sayings on divorce and remarriage in the gospels (not discussed by Ehrman but addressed in detail in D. C. Parker's - The Living Text of the Gospels) and the Lord's Prayer among others. Therefore, it seems clear that the Gospels are not so well textually preserved as some people would have us imagine and that there exist many variations which have profound effects upon the meaning of texts and theological issues.

The previous reviewer - who is clearly upset at some Muslim reviewers and thus provides a link to an irrelevant polemical article in frustration - also talks about the "the oldest Christian manuscripts" and how these are "most reliable" not realizing that Ehrman, and others, have pointed out numerous times that the earliest manuscripts are precisely the most problematic - revealing the most variations, which indicates that the texts of the gospels were in a state of flux in the earliest period of their transmission. A detailed discussion of the manuscripts of the New Testament, based on writings of scholars such as Prof. Ehrman and others, is to be found here:

http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Bibaccuracy.html

Moreover, the problem of the "original text" is also discussed by Ehrman and he states that many textual critics are now beginning to doubt even if there is such a thing as an "original" to be restored. In particular, Ehrman explains the problematic nature of the issue and why we cannot get back to the "original" text itself in light of the copying practises of the first three centuries. Therefore, we can only hope to recover early forms of the text, not the "originals," and hope that these early forms are relatively close to the long lost "originals".

Besides the above issues, Ehrman provides a fascinating discussion of how the various New Testament editions were produced, particularly the one by Erasmus, and how Christians reacted when certain individuals here and there stumbled across variant readings. Ehrman also goes on to explain how he eventually came to the conclusion that the New Testament writings were not inspired and that their authors were non-inspired writers.

I would recommend this book to anyone who wishes to learn about the textual criticism and transmission of the New Testament writings! If you know nothing about this complex subject, then this is where you should start. After going through "Misquoting Jesus," it should be much easier for you to read books aimed at those who already know something about the subject.
Comment Comments (4) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars A thoughtful read
I have long felt that the Bible, as interpreted today by many, may not have been what was originally intended. Read more
Published 13 hours ago by Irvinlee

5.0 out of 5 stars The Word of God Shaped by Human Hands
The deeply held view that the Bible is inerrant is a completely modern idea and not, in itself, a Biblical one at that. Read more
Published 8 days ago by Matthew W. Kingore

3.0 out of 5 stars Chiasmus and Luke 22:43-44
One of Bart Erhman's major arguments in his book "Misquoting Jesus" is easily proven wrong. That argument is that the account of Christ's sweating blood (Luke 22:43-44) cannot be... Read more
Published 15 days ago by C. E. Hughes

4.0 out of 5 stars Rewriting Faith
The biggest problem with "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart D. Ehrman is the title. While undoubtedly an attention grabber, this book is about the changes which were written into the New... Read more
Published 21 days ago by Dave_42

3.0 out of 5 stars It's got SOME up sides.
Ehrman weaves complex arguments with simplistic evidence, leaving no doubt that further research is necessary, but maybe that's the point. Read more
Published 24 days ago by Tarah L. Neujahr

5.0 out of 5 stars Misquoting Jesus is a superb exercise in NT investigation
In writing "Misquoting Jesus" Prof. Bart Ehrman has developed his enormous capacitry for investigation in an tremendous variety of fields -- history, history of European culture,... Read more
Published 24 days ago by Dr. James O. Pellicer

4.0 out of 5 stars misquoting jesus
a good book but many typos. appears that spellcheck worked, but proof reader did not. doing a review with the kindle keyboard is not user friendly :-)
Published 26 days ago

5.0 out of 5 stars A Fascinating Study
Oh no, not another "the Christians got it wrong and Dan Brown is right!" book. Not at all. In fact, Misquoting Jesus is a history of the text we think of today as the New... Read more
Published 1 month ago by Chris Schaefer

1.0 out of 5 stars Misrepresenting Truth, a critical review with documentation
Misquoting Jesus by Ehrman is interesting to read, thought provoking, and written by a qualified scholar. As he acknowledges, the facts Ehrman presents are not new. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Craig R. Ewoldt

5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars For Determination
How many times can one man write the same book? How many times can he get people to buy it and call it brilliant? Read more
Published 1 month ago by NightShade

Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
› See all 5 discussions...  
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
   

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Look for Similar Items by Category

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:
















i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...
 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.