War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism (Hardcover)

+

+

Price For All Three: $46.55

Show availability and shipping details

• This item: War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism by Douglas J. Feith

  In Stock.
  Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
  Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
  

• Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto by Mark R. Levin

  In Stock.
  Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
  Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
  

• Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change by Jonah Goldberg

  In Stock.
  Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
  Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
  

Moment of Truth in Iraq: How a New 'Greatest Generation' of American Soldiers is Turning Defeat and Disaster into Victory and Hope by Michael Yon 4.8 out of 5 stars (119)  $19.77

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change by Jonah Goldberg 4.1 out of 5 stars (445)  $11.56

The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression by Amity Shlaes 4.0 out of 5 stars (269)  $10.87

Willful Blindness: Memoir of the Jihad by Andrew C. McCarthy 4.3 out of 5 stars (19)  $17.13

Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations by John Bolton 4.1 out of 5 stars (56)  $10.80

› Explore similar items

Review
"If you want to read a serious book about the origins and consequences of the intervention in Iraq in 2003, you owe it to yourself to get hold of a copy of Douglas Feith’s War and Decision." -- Christopher Hitchens, Slate

"Meticulous. . . . A convincing refutation of unfair allegations about the author [and] a balanced analysis of policy debates about Iraq inside the administration. . . . Will be studied for years by journalists, historians and aspiring political appointees." -- National Review

"One would have expected, as in the case of all the other Iraq exposés, that [Feith] would use the memoir genre to get even. Instead, he is self–critical, even admits to occasional hubris, but, more importantly, also chronicles the contortions and reinventions of many post–2003/4 critics of the war." -- Victor Davis Hanson, National Review Online

"What’s needed now? More memoirs, more data, more information, more testimony. More serious books, like Doug Feith’s. More ‘this is what I saw’ and ‘this is what is true.’ Feed history." -- Peggy Noonan, Wall Street Journal

“Douglas Feith has written a model memoir: fair-minded, objective, and without rancor. The fact that the policy to which he contributed was flawed from the outset in no way diminishes the historical importance of this firsthand account.” -- —Jean Edward Smith, John Marshall Professor of Political Science, Marshall University; author of FDR; Grant; And John Marshall: Definer of a Nation

“Douglas Feith has written what will be a controversial book. It will certainly anger many readers because it takes a different position than most other accounts on the wisdom of going to war in Iraq, on what mistakes were made, and on who made them. But Feith’s is a serious work, well documented, that presents the best defense to date of the defining policy of the Bush presidency. It is a readable account that deserves to be read and its argument debated.” -- —Robert L. Gallucci, Dean of the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University; Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, Clinton Administration

“For anyone seriously interested in the decisions prior to and during the Iraq war, War and Decision is a must-read book. It is the first from within the Department of Defense, and Feith provides careful documentation rather than just freewheeling opinions. He explodes many of the journalistic and political myths that have become widely accepted. He provides a spirited defense of the President’s decisions, though the subsequent discussion makes clear the failures in execution. His judgments are thoughtful—and, for a major player in the process, he is quite objective regarding what went wrong. War and Decision will be a treasure trove for the historians—when the current passions have finally cooled.” -- —James Schlesinger, Director of Central Intelligence, Nixon Administration; Secretary of Defense, Nixon and Ford Administrations; Secretary of Energy, Carter Administration

“The fullest and most thoughtful statement of the Pentagon thinking prior to and in the first stages of the Iraq war. Even those, as I, who take issue with some of its conclusions will gain a better perspective from reading this book.” -- —Henry A. Kissinger, National Security Adviser, Nixon Administration; Secretary of State, Nixon and Ford Administrations

Review
"Extraordinarily frank and persuasive. . . . [O]ur first in-depth look at the inside of the Bush administration's national security top leadership from one who was there. [Feith] has been criticized harshly and, I think, unfairly." (Michael Barone, U.S. News & World Report )

"As Americans turned on the Iraq war, anti-war forces tried to portray the war as not only a mistake, but the result of a neoconservative coup. . . . In his new memoir, War and Decision, Mr. Feith does an admirable job in dispelling this hokum." (Eli Lake, New York Sun )

"By far the most balanced, detailed, and lucid account of this story that's come out yet. . . . Feith makes the first intellectually serious attempt to explain how the government tried to answer that question [of settling post-9/11 defense strategy] in the years after 9/11." ("The Corner," National Review Online )

"One would have expected, as in the case of all the other Iraq exposs, that [Feith] would use the memoir genre to get even. Instead, he is self-critical, even admits to occasional hubris, but, more importantly, also chronicles the contortions and reinventions of many post-2003/4 critics of the war." (Victor Davis Hanson, National Review Online )

"Indispensable. . . . The best account to date of how the administration debated, decided, organized and executed its military responses to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Much of what makes War and Decision so compelling is that it is, in effect, a revisionist history." (Bret Stephens, Wall Street Journal )

"What's needed now? More memoirs, more data, more information, more testimony. More serious books, like Doug Feith's. More 'this is what I saw' and 'this is what is true.' Feed history." (Peggy Noonan, Wall Street Journal )

"Extraordinary. . . . I was unprepared for the thoroughness of the documentation, the sweeping nature of the narrative and the highly readable prose. It is the first attempt by a serious student of history to lay out the myriad, challenging choices confronting a president. . . . Splendid." (Frank J. Gaffney Jr., Washington Times )

"Meticulous. . . . A convincing refutation of unfair allegations about the author [and] a balanced analysis of policy debates about Iraq inside the administration. . . . Will be studied for years by journalists, historians and aspiring political appointees." (National Review )

"If you want to read a serious book about the origins and consequences of the intervention in Iraq in 2003, you owe it to yourself to get hold of a copy of Douglas Feith's War and Decision." (Christopher Hitchens, Slate )

See all Editorial Reviews

First Sentence:
The threat of jihadist terrorism was on the list of U.S. government concerns at the start of the Bush Administration in early 2001, but it got less attention than Russia did. Read the first page Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
special operations forces, executive steering group, liberation strategy, campaign planning committee, postwar planning office, catastrophic weapons, weapons declaration, state supporters, former intelligence officials, interagency meetings, warlord militias, intelligence errors, combatant commands Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
United States, President Bush, Security Council, Saddam Hussein, Defense Department, United Nations, State Department, Northern Alliance, White House, Bush Administration, Governing Council, Gulf War, Principals Committee, Middle East, Deputies Committee, General Myers, North Korea, Joint Staff, Secretary of Defense, General Franks, Geneva Conventions, Soviet Union, Iraq Survey Group, Baath Party, Free Iraqi Forces Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

47 Reviews 5 star:  (24) 4 star:  (9) 3 star:  (2) 2 star:  (3) 1 star:  (9)           Average Customer Review 3.8 out of 5 stars (47 customer reviews)		Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews   227 of 259 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent personal memoir, April 27, 2008 By  Michael T Kennedy (Mission Viejo, CA USA) - See all my reviews    I have now finished the book but the number of negative reviews posted here still suggests that half a review by someone who has read the book carefully was better than what else is on offer so far. I have not altered my comments since reading the rest but have a few additional observations. This is a personal story of Feith's career in the DoD, before and during the Iraq War. He comments on contacts with others but he does not offer general statements or philosophy about matters that he is not personally familiar with. He does, however, offer some conclusions at the end about what was done well and what the mistakes were. He is honest about identifying his opinions and what he believes to be facts. This is a source document for the history that will be eventually written, hopefully fairly, about this period. I marked a number of sections because they impact the mythology of the war as illustrated in the other reviews and comments. He is critical of Colin Powell, and especially, Richard Armitage, who seemed not to be as concerned with the post-Saddam situation yet who resisted anyone else treading on their turf. His first skirmish was in 2002 (page 173) when he attempted to set up an office, called Office of Strategic Influence, to counteract the Islamist propaganda about why violent jihad was becoming a threat. Some went back to the old "root causes" excuse yet the Saudi hijackers of 9/11 were upper middle class educated men. His effort came to naught when the office was attacked in a strategic leak from within the administration, followed by a sensational NY Times article that accused them of planning to spread false information. Another similar article was printed recently about another DoD effort to reach Muslims with honest information. In his conclusions, he points out that we still do not have any serious effort to counter jihadist rhetoric. He refutes (page 197) another charge, prominent in another review here, that Chalabi was a "creature" of DoD and Feith was his "sponsor." One would think that the fact the Chalabi has been a major official in the Iraq government would put to rest that old CIA smear but it lives on on Amazon pages. He tells the story of CIA incompetence and the firestorm created when a 20-year DIA expert on his staff wrote a critical briefing (page 265) pointing out how CIA had ignored links between Saddam and al Qeada before the war. On page 278, he recounts another example of State's conflicted thinking where they advise against an "occupation" but their antipathy toward the "externals" (exiles like Chalabi) leads them to plan for a "many year" occupation and rule before an Iraqi government can be set up. The insurgency gained force from resentment at that policy. He points out with some understandable satisfaction that the "externals," including the Kurds who CIA predicted would not be accepted by other Iraqis, constituted almost the entire interim government that took over from Bremer and the CPA in 2004. He has some mixed opinions about Paul Bremer, pointing out how Bremer took too much authority, resisting any consultation with Rumsfeld, his superior in the chain-of-command, and made a number of serious mistakes. The most serious one was excluding the Iraqis from governing their own country for as long as he did. The insurgency might never have gained the support of so much of the Sunni population had the "Occupation" not been so obvious. I don't say this is the last word and Feith seems to resist many generalizations. This is an objective account and very valuable. He has his deficiencies. The most serious is the fact the he never mentions the tribal nature of the Iraqi society. This was a major mistake in the early history of our post-Saddam attempts to govern the country and fight the insurgency. I have read many books on this subject and the ones I respect, beginning with The Threatening Storm by Kenneth Pollack, all mostly agree. For example, another review here mentions Bob Baer and his book about Aghanistan and Gary Berntsen and "Jawbreaker" also about Afghanistan. I have read both books and Baer, in particular, dismisses his CIA bosses pointing out the lack of language skills in CIA. This lack, and the ignorance of the culture, was a major factor in the CIAs poor performance in Iraq and is discussed by Feith. He is chiefly critical of CIA implying that their information was better sourced than it was. They concealed how few assets they had in Iraq (none) and led others astray who placed more faith in their reports than was warranted. Better to confess ignorance than mislead. The dissent, like some of the other reviews here, comes with plenty of invective and obscenity but few facts. I still think this is an important book that anyone trying to understand our policy on fighting militant Islam should read. I'm sure Feith is evening a few scores here but he marshals lots of facts and refers to other documents to support his conclusions. This is an essential book, not least because he is such a controversial figure. The abuse he has taken from partisans is outrageous. At one point (page 388) he mentions a particularly odious slur attributed to Colin Powell by Bob Woodward in which Feith's office in the DoD is described as "a Gestapo office" ignoring the fact that Feith's father was a Holocaust survivor. Powell denied making the remark and apologized to Feith, whom he had known for 20 years, but the tone was set. Comment Comments (15) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)   43 of 49 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Hitchens on Feith, June 3, 2008 By  Billy Ruff'n (At sea) - See all my reviews From http://www.slate.com/id/2192696/ A Tale of Two Tell-Alls IF YOU WANT TO READ A SERIOUS BOOK ABOUT THE INTERVENTION IN IRAQ, LOOK TO DOUGLAS FEITH. By Christopher Hitchens Posted Monday, June 2, 2008, at 11:40 AM ET When Bush's Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill defected from the Cabinet in 2002 and Ron Suskind told O'Neill's story of being surrounded by fools, Michael Kinsley observed that the president deserved all he got from the book. Anyone dumb enough to hire a fool like O'Neill in the first place ought to have known what to expect. So it goes with the ludicrous figure of Scott McClellan. I used to watch this mooncalf blunder his way through press conferences and think, Exactly where do we find such men? For the job of swabbing out the White House stables, yes. But for any task involving the weighing of words? Hah! Now it seems that he realizes, and with a shock at that, that there was a certain amount of "spin" or propaganda involved in his job description. Well, give the man a cigar. Beyond that, the book is effectively valueless to the anti-war camp since, as McClellan says of the president, "I consider him a fundamentally decent person, and I do not believe he or his White House deliberately or consciously sought to deceive the American people." Bertrand Russell's principle of evidence against interest--if the pope has doubts about Jesus, his doubts are by definition more newsworthy than the next person's--doesn't really justify the ocean of coverage in which the talentless McClellan is currently so far out of his depth. For one thing, he doesn't supply anything that can really be called evidence. For another, having not noticed any "propaganda machine" at the time he was perspiring his way through his simple job, he has a clear mercenary interest in discovering one in retrospect. If you want to read a serious book about the origins and consequences of the intervention in Iraq in 2003, you owe it to yourself to get hold of a copy of Douglas Feith's War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism. As undersecretary of defense for policy, Feith was one of those most intimately involved in the argument about whether to and, if so, how to put an end to the regime of Saddam Hussein. His book contains notes made in real time at the National Security Council, a trove of declassified documentation, and a thoroughly well-organized catalog of sources and papers and memos. Feith has also done us the service of establishing a Web site where you can go and follow up all his sources and check them for yourself against his analysis and explanation. There is more of value in any chapter of this archive than in any of the ramblings of McClellan. As I write this on the first day of June, about a book that was published in the first week of April, the books pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Boston Globe have not seen fit to give Feith a review. An article on his book, written by the excellent James Risen for the news pages of the New York Times, has not run. This all might seem less questionable if it were not for the still-ballooning acreage awarded to Scott McClellan. Feith was and is very much identified with the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, and he certainly did not believe that Saddam Hussein was ever containable in a sanctions "box." But he is capable of separating his views from his narrative, and this absorbing account of the interdepartmental and ideological quarrels within the Bush administration, on the Afghanistan and Guantanamo fronts as well as about Iraq, will make it difficult if not impossible for people to go on claiming that, for instance: 1. There was no rational reason to suspect a continuing Iraqi WMD threat. Feith's citations from the Duelfer Report alone are stunning in their implications. 2. That alternatives to war were never discussed and that the administration was out to "get" Saddam Hussein from the start. 3. That the advocates of regime change hoped and indeed planned to anoint Ahmad Chalabi as a figurehead leader in Baghdad. 4. That there was no consideration given to postwar planning. It's also of considerable interest to learn that the main argument for adhering to the Geneva Conventions was made within the Pentagon and that the man who expressed the most prewar misgivings concerning Iraq was none other than Donald Rumsfeld. Feith doesn't deny that he has biases of his own. One of these concerns the widely circulated charge that his own Office of Special Plans was engaged in cherry-picking and stovepiping intelligence. Another is the criticism, made by most of the neocon faction, of Paul Bremer and the occupation regime that he ran in Baghdad. In all instances, however, Feith writes in an unrancorous manner and is careful to supply the evidence and the testimony and, where possible, the actual documentation, from all sides. Without explicitly saying so, Feith makes a huge contribution to the growing case for considering the Central Intelligence Agency to be well beyond salvage. Its role as a highly politicized and bewilderingly incompetent body, disastrous enough in having left us under open skies before Sept. 11, 2001, became something more like catastrophic with the gross mishandling of Iraq. For these revelations alone, this book is well worth the acquisition. (I might add that, unlike McClellan, Feith is contributing all his earnings and royalties to charities that care for our men and women in uniform.) I don't know Feith, but I can pay him two further compliments: When you read him on a detail with which you yourself are familiar, he is factually reliable (and it's not often that one can say that, believe me). And his prose style is easy, nonbureaucratic, dry, and sometimes amusing. If a book that was truly informative was called a "tell-all" by our media, then War and Decision would qualify. As it is, we seem to reserve that term for the work of bigmouths who have little, if anything, to impart. Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)   19 of 22 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars I am grateful for this book, June 6, 2008 By  J. Foote - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)    Like many of my neighbors, I scraped the faded American flag decal off my back window in, oh, about 2005 when I became disgusted with the war in Iraq. Two questions kept popping up in my mind: "Why are we still in this?" and "Why didn't the planners see this mess coming?" Like many, I had forgotten (or perhaps had never really understood) the purpose of the war which I think Feith summarizes best in one of his chapter titles: "Change the Way We Live, Or Change the Way They Live". His explanation took care of my first question. Feith's book takes long strides to answer the second question, and it was well worth my time. Without a doubt this book is from Feith's viewpoint, as it should be. As he recounts, others disagreed with his views. But even if you disagree with Feith's viewpoint, you should read this book. After reading it, I am grateful to Doug Feith for this book, not to mention his service to this nation. Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this) Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review › See all 47 customer reviews...		Ad feedback   Most Recent Customer Reviews 5.0 out of 5 stars A modern political gem Though ostensibly written as a response to the multiplying claims of villainy(see negative reviews and comments below), Feith has exploited this opportunity to give rare insight... Read more Published 26 days ago by Michael M. Danziger 5.0 out of 5 stars Eye Opener ! I, like most Americans, had been indoctrinated with the "Bush lied, people died" mantra of the media. Read more Published 3 months ago by Frank 1.0 out of 5 stars Reviewer Bias I think it's interesting how all the 5 star and 4 star reviews come from blind followers of the Republican Party line, and the 3 star and below reviews come from opponents of the... Read more Published 3 months ago by Scott Beckes 5.0 out of 5 stars The nexus: terrorists, WMD, and state sponsors of terror Why Iraq? That is the big question Feith answers. As a continuing theme of the book, Feith describes the problem of the nexus of (1) state sponsors of terrorism, (2) terrorist... Read more Published 4 months ago by Robert J. Scheppy 4.0 out of 5 stars Surprised!!!! I read this book to get a Bush Administration view of the Iraq conflict, having read many "neutral" and anti-Bush volumes previously. Read more Published 4 months ago by Charles Zwilling 1.0 out of 5 stars OMG, such a boring self serving novel. how did it make best seller? perhaps because it had inside info disclosed , not becasue it is good reading, or an insightful tome! Read more Published 5 months ago by N. Werle 4.0 out of 5 stars War and Decision Former U.S. officials, military officers, and journalists have penned dozens of books about the decision to oust Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and its aftermath. Read more Published 5 months ago by Michael Rubin 3.0 out of 5 stars what we thought we knew is all wrong, BUT... The title, subtitle, and tag line "War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terror, Douglas J. Read more Published 6 months ago by C. Kollars 4.0 out of 5 stars A worthy defense of the Bush Administration Doug Feith's book is a welcome respite from much of the self-serving memoirs written by former Bush Administration officials. Read more Published 7 months ago by Quentin E. Hodgson 5.0 out of 5 stars Timeline facts on the war on terrorism This book is not an attempt to revise history, but rather to set the record straight. It was written by an author who was in a unique position to observe the Pentagon decision... Read more Published 10 months ago by Deane Hillsman Search Customer Reviews Only search this product's reviews › See all 47 customer reviews...

• Books > Biographies & Memoirs > Leaders & Notable People > Political
• Books > Biographies & Memoirs > Memoirs
• Books > History > Americas > United States > 21st Century
• Books > History > Middle East > Iraq
• Books > History > Military > Iraq War
• Books > Nonfiction > Current Events > Terrorism
• Books > Nonfiction > Politics > International > Relations
• Books > Political Parties > Red Politics