Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$11.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
Fulfilled by Amazon

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
or
Get a $1.84 Amazon.com Gift Card
The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition
 
 
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition [Paperback]

Nathan Brackett (Author), Christian Hoard (Contributor)
2.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (93 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


4 new from $35.11 21 used from $6.14

Formats

 Amazon Price New from Used from
Library Binding --   -- --
Paperback --   $35.11 $6.14

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll (Revised and Updated for the 21st Century)

The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll (Revised and Updated for the 21st Century)

by Holly George-Warren
3.7 out of 5 stars (29)  $19.77
500 Greatest Albums of All Times, The

500 Greatest Albums of All Times, The

by Joe Levy
3.3 out of 5 stars (30) 
1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die

1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die

by Robert Dimery
3.5 out of 5 stars (47) 
The Essential Rock Discography: Complete Discographies Listing Every Track Recorded by More Than 1,200 Artists

The Essential Rock Discography: Complete Discographies Listing Every Track Recorded by More Than 1,200 Artists

by Martin C. Strong
3.7 out of 5 stars (27) 
The Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely New Reviews: Every Essential Album, Every Essential Artist

The Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely New Reviews: Every Essential Album, Every Essential Artist

by Rolling Stone Magazine
3.2 out of 5 stars (20) 
› Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

"How do you make an album guide that fits in a book bag?" Bracket asks in the introduction to this door-stopping compendium. "Selectively," he answers. To trim down the possibilities, the editors of this book decided to limit their entries to domestically released recordings currently available through major online stores. This makes it easy for consumers to buy what they want, as long as they want the latest mainstream music. Roughly 70 percent of the writing in this guide is new; Brackett notes that the editors chose artists who "have made a lasting, undeniable contribution to pop music." There are extra-long entries for Miles Davis, Dion, John Lee Hooker, B.B. King, Elvis and Muddy Waters, but a few baffling oversights (e.g., George Harrison is missing while the maligned Paula Abdul remains). The Guide is not intended for popular music historians, but a comparison with earlier editions reveals much about trends in popular music commentary: Chicago’s recordings, once ahead of their time, are now "schlock;" a Rolling Stone reviewer has realized that Yes made some good records; and Tony Bennett merits triple the space he occupied in 1992. The new edition’s 72 authors (vs. the four in 1992) produce a tone and style less consistent than in past editions. Some things have not changed: the best-selling albums generally get the highest ratings, and punks and bluesmen are demigods. Often entertaining, the guide offers comprehensive album lists and usefully ranks the innumerable collections available for many artists. (Also welcome is the short section on anthologies and soundtracks.) However, readers seeking lengthy reviews of individual albums would probably be better off looking elsewhere.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Product Description

It is often difficult to assess the many new emerging music genres without some guidance from a well-respected voice to help differentiate the good from the mediocre, the classic from the fleeting. THE NEW ROLLING STONE ALBUM GUIDE provides readers with such direction, categorising the new sounds with insightful analyses and critical judgement. The new guide celebrates rock's diversity and it's constant metamorphoses. Continuing the useful one-to-five-star ratings of THE ROLLING STONE ALBUM GUIDE, published in 1992, the new volume gets a fresh makeover with the addition of new artists, as well as updated entries, without compromising the indispensable material in the original guide. In addition, a new introduction addresses the changes in the music industry and explores the brouhaha surrounding internet music downloads. Rolling Stone editors Nathan Brackett, Joe Levy, Christian Hoard, and Jenny Eliscu write new entries and update existing material with flair and authority, making this volume the guide to own. With clarity and accuracy, the editors feature records from the seminal bands and DJs that epitomise the beats of the Nineties and the incipient sounds of the 21st century.
See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

  • Paperback: 944 pages
  • Publisher: Fireside; 4 Rev Upd edition (November 2, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0743201698
  • ISBN-13: 978-0743201698
  • Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 7.4 x 2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 3.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 2.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (93 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #580,420 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Front Cover | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:
Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
Appropriately for a nice Midwestern girl, the late Aaliyah Haughton occupied the sensible middle ground of R&B divas. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
nonalbum singles, pop smarts, melodic instincts, real folk blues, career summation, final studio album, reggae greats, title track, guitar textures, pop appeal, album guide, proper album, new studio album, remix album, early albums, solo debut, new jack swing, greatest hits, guitar jams, live album, individual albums, title tune, bonus disc, sophomore album, guitar noise
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Warner Bros, New York, New Orleans, Bob Dylan, Def Jam, James Brown, Grateful Dead, Johnny Cash, Los Angeles, Beach Boys, Billie Holiday, Blue Note, Miles Davis, Lead Belly, Ray Charles, Beggars Banquet, Neil Young, Sam Cooke, Led Zeppelin, Lou Reed, San Francisco, Sub Pop, Chuck Berry, Eric Clapton, The Ultimate Collection
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:

Books on Related Topics (learn more)
 
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition
46% buy the item featured on this page:
The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition by Nathan Brackett Paperback 2.6 out of 5 stars (93)
The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll (Revised and Updated for the 21st Century)
23% buy
The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll (Revised and Updated for the 21st Century) by Holly George-Warren Paperback 3.7 out of 5 stars (29)
$19.77
All Music Guide to Rock: The Definitive Guide to Rock, Pop, and Soul (3rd Edition)
11% buy
All Music Guide to Rock: The Definitive Guide to Rock, Pop, and Soul (3rd Edition) by Bogdanov V Paperback 4.0 out of 5 stars (22)
$21.86
500 Greatest Albums of All Times, The
11% buy
500 Greatest Albums of All Times, The by Joe Levy Paperback 3.3 out of 5 stars (30)
› Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(5)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
Agree with these tags?
See all 11 tags...

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more
 

Customer Reviews

93 Reviews
5 star:
 (17)
4 star:
 (11)
3 star:
 (11)
2 star:
 (26)
1 star:
 (28)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.6 out of 5 stars (93 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
83 of 88 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Earlier Editions Were MUCH Better, November 5, 2004
By Jim Mitchell (St. Louis) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition (Paperback)
The two previous versions of the RS Album Guide that I own are some of the most frequently read music books in my house. I've long been awaiting a new volume, since most of my listening habits started after the release of the '92 edition, and a lot of my favorite CDs were obviously not reviewed. So it's not as if I don't thoroughly enjoy the content of these books. But something is wrong with this update. Maybe access to the internet has made such books obsolete- why pay this kind of money when similar and much more thorough information is available online? Or maybe I'm just not as interested in pop culture trivia as I was ten years ago. Or maybe this book just isn't written as well as the two previous versions were. I think it's a combination of all three, with an emphasis on the latter.

Given the diversity of popular music these days, I think that such a book like this spreads itself too thin. I'm no fan of many of the bands that other reviews have complained about being omitted from the book, but I certainly understand why a Deep Purple or Metallica fan would be upset that a book by Rolling Stone Magazine would skip them. The reviews themselves just seem...I don't know...skimpy. Obviously you can't give indepth reviews of every album by every artist in a book of this scope, but it seems that there was much more information in the previous editions. The reviews seem much more cynical, too- I appreciate that they albums are being reviewed from a contemporary viewpoint, but certainly my favorite classic rock records can't have aged THAT much, can they? Also, the print is enormous in this book, making its bulk somewhat deceptive. With smaller type, the book could have either been smaller and therefore less cumbersome (and less expensive), or far more information could have been packed in on the pages. As it stands, there's usually not more than one artist per page, yet as mentioned, the reviews seem shorter and less substantial than earlier editions. The biographical info is noticably shorter, and rarely is any album given more than one or two sentences. And sometimes the information just seems inaccurate or misinformed. The Springsteen review dismisses Bruce's admittedly inferior but hardly terrible work of the 90s with 2 star reviews and little justifcation. I don't mind someone giving something a poor review even if I happen to like it, but let's hear why. Same way with Pink Floyd- "The Wall" is dismissed as awful (which may or may not be true), but little explanation is offered as to why such a huge album is considered at best mediocre. Bruce Springsteen's "Streets of Philadelphia" is dismissed because it "sucks". Well, maybe it's not a good song, but let's come up with something better than "sucks, which is what you'd expect to read in an average chatroom conversation. Since when has Rolling Stone pandered to such a juvenile mentality? (Wait- don't answer that.) The book also makes some odd factual statements, such as the blurb about Springsteen's drummer Max Weinberg and his guitarist Steve Van Zandt having greater commercial success in the 90s than did the "solo" Springsteen. Excuse me, but what did Max or Steve record in the 90s that sold more than anything put out by Bruce? Sure, they had TV success, but that's comparing apples and oranges. Minor point, but just seems a bit sloppy. And finally, the thoroughness of the discographies seems a bit inconsistent. Some lists are quite thorough, while other artists of the same stature and caliber have only a handful of their albums listed.

Some positives include the addition of various artists from rap and other genres. While I think trying to include them only succeeds in biting off more than it can chew, I'm glad to be able to read about significant artists that fall outside of the narrow definition of rock and roll.

So this new edition of the Album Guide was a huge disappointment. It seems like depth and quality were sacrified for the sake of sheer quantity. Intelligent writing was thrown out the window for the sake of sounding trendily cynical. At $30, save your money and use it to pay a month or two of your internet bill, or buy one of the much more comprehensive Allmusic guides. I'll never argue that the internet can replace a good solid book, but I'll gladly take a good website managed by a true music lover over a sloppy and juvenile work such as this one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
60 of 68 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars George Harrison should not have been omitted, November 11, 2004
This review is from: The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition (Paperback)
Milli Vanilli's place in Rolling Stone's Album Guide is secure. Thank God, because they definitely earned it. I'm sure tons of people are holding off on purchasing their albums until they see how many stars Rolling Stone awarded them.

But I guess recently-inducted Rock and Roll Hall of Famer George Harrison, an artist who earned a high ranking on Rolling Stone's own list of greatest guitarist, doesn't really warrant a few paragraphs. After all, who still listens to "All Things Must Pass" anyway?

But if you're interested in the umpteenth live All-Starr band release from Ringo, it is rated in this guide. That's not to say Ringo should've been cut, but c'mon. If Ringo's solo career deserves recognition, I think a half-page or so could've been reserved for George.

I don't want it to seem like that's my only beef with this new edition. I was dissapointed to see that quite a few entries are basically the same as in the previous edition. These guys had 12 years, I think they could've done better than "70 percent" new material (that's by their own admission in the book's forward).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars If you think "Dark Side of the Moon" was just OK , you found your book~!, October 9, 2005
This review is from: The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition (Paperback)
What a waste of a twenty spot!!!! One star is too much....

Me, I Wished I Had Checked This Out From The Library...Then I could have brought it back. Once upon a time I would look to Rolling Stone for the best in popular music record reviews. No more! Now, much like the decline of the print magazine, the record guide also sucks much more than some of the albums reviewed. I guess I would rather listen to A-ha's second album than read this. Notable for what it leaves out, including George Harrison, Widespead Panic, NIN, Metallica and Ry Cooder, among many others. 98 Degrees and Justin Timberlake ARE included. Take your money, and buy a subscription to Paste Magazine and bookmark the all music guide web site for your record reviews.

Also, the reviewers attempts to sound hip fall flatter than a stale joke. One of these kids thinks Pink Floyd's "the wall" sucks.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars Bigger, but less informative
This updated guide is somehow much bigger and much less informative than the previous edition. Hip-hop and punk bands are emphasized, but acts from Louis Armstrong to Tom Jones... Read more
Published 9 months ago by Steven Lee Wiggins

1.0 out of 5 stars get allmusic guide or rough guide instead
I've seen these at the library, you'd be doing yourself a disservice not to get allmusic's guide, or rough guide instead, they sell here for[...] and are much much better. Read more
Published 10 months ago by Vikram S. Valia

1.0 out of 5 stars Amazing ...
I was curious about this book, so I flipped to the Queen section. After about a page of scathing reviews, there was a paragraph which stated that the decline of the band occurred... Read more
Published 12 months ago by Phoresic

2.0 out of 5 stars rolling missed the stone
The reviewrers miss the point of rating albums simply by not including all artist in the review process,several reviews mentioned artist by name as affecting the music that... Read more
Published 17 months ago by Candace Ritting

1.0 out of 5 stars Everything You Hate About Rolling Stone In One Nifty Package!
I'd like confirmation on the exact moment God spoke to the writers and editors of Rolling Stone magazine and said, "From this day forward, your views about popular music, what is... Read more
Published 19 months ago by M. McKay

5.0 out of 5 stars Entertainment Tonight
I'm a little puzzled by previous reviewers who've fumed about the alleged omission of such bands as NIN and Metallica from this edition of the guide, when in fact they're right... Read more
Published on April 6, 2008 by Roochak

5.0 out of 5 stars More inside than record reviews
This new edition was very welcome. I compared it to the 1992 edition and was pleased to see both some consistency and some deviation from the previous editons and reviews of the... Read more
Published on February 21, 2008 by Peter A. Manzi

1.0 out of 5 stars Really shows Rolling Stone are at a complete loss
The previous Rolling Stone Album Guide is a book I will always have some respect for because it introduced me for the first tim ever to music that was never or rarely played on... Read more
Published on November 17, 2007 by mianfei

1.0 out of 5 stars Get the previous editions!!!
Think about a classical music guide that omits Mozart, claims that Bach is a mediocre composer, and tries to make you believe that Richard Clayderman's recordings are underrated... Read more
Published on October 30, 2007 by Walter Sosa

1.0 out of 5 stars don't believe the hype
reviews are off the top of head throwaways...and you'll be disgusted to find that METALLICA and NINE INCH NAILS have no entries. go look! unbelievable!
Published on March 20, 2007 by John Fortunato

Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide

Look for Similar Items by Category

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:


















i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...
 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.