Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
110 of 119 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
This PMP Is Not At All Fond of the Rita Mulcahy Approach, June 30, 2006
I bought Rita Mulcahy's 5th edition PMP Exam Prep book on the advice of a PMP-certified PM who had used her earlier book to pass the previous version of the exam. She spoke highly of Rita. I have no idea why.
Not only did I buy this book, but I also took and completed her online course in order to obtain the 35 credit hours required to sit for the exam. Don't waste your money on the online course. It's nothing but a rehash of the book, word for word, with little "next" and "previous" arrows instead of pages. But just so we're clear, these comments are about the book itself, not the online material. (Reviewing the online "course" would include an entire litany of different complaints!)
How do I hate this book? Let me count the ways. First, the presentation and organization of the material is disorganized and overly complicated. The book includes a LOT of detail, so much that it's hard to discern what's useful and what's extraneous. Yet, in spite of this I still had exam questions (such as PTA calculations) that the Mulcahy book doesn't mention, let alone explain in depth. This book takes the "quantity over quality" approach to PMI material.
Most study aids conveniently arrange the material in a logical format by process groups, knowledge areas, inputs, tools and techniques and outputs. Rita's book doesn't and it's detrimental to learning the material. Instead of telling you what the PMBOK lists as inputs and helping you understand them so you don't have to just memorize them by rote, she instead includes a large number of worthless exercises to have you "guess" what you might need. The same goes for tools and techniques, and outputs. While that's a delightful "pie in the sky" approach to organic project management, I found it a complete waste of time as an exam studying approach. And this from a book that claims to be a "course in a book for passing the PMP exam" no less!
In much the same fashion, Mulcahy proudly touts her "Process Game", an exercise where you cut up a bunch of processes from paper and arrange them into process groups, correctly ordering in the Planning process group. Again Mulcahy overcomplicates and obfuscates the entire process in two ways: 1) Half of the processes in her "game" aren't the same names that the PMBOK uses and 2) She randomly throws in additional "subprocesses"! Here's the thing, if you simply buy a real study book, and you learn that all of the processes occur in the standard PMBOK order (Integration, Scope, Time, Cost, Quality, HR, Risk, Procurement) in each process group where they appear, the rest of it falls into place. I found that this "game" actually confused me more, and made it tougher for me to learn. Once I trashed the pieces and stopped trying to learn it the overly-complicated "Rita way" everything came together for me.
More disturbing than the overwhelming volume of material, some of which I found totally irrelevant and all of which was terribly organized, I found the condescending, snarky, downright rude tone of the book insulting. I've been a professional project manager for many years and I think that the approach that RMC Project Management takes in this book of belittling the student is completely unprofessional. It distracts from the material and served no purpose. I don't understand why a business would insult its customers as routinely as RMC Project Management does in this book.
I studied for the PMP for several months, on the side. I didn't have a chance to take a week off to prepare solidly. About three months into using the Rita Mulcahy book and online system, I was so frustrated that I went out and started looking for other books instead. I found "The PMP Exam: How to Pass on Your First Try" by Andy Crowe of Velociteach and started reading that. VERY quickly I realized that Crowe's book presented the material well, logically, and without all of the extraneous fluff and insults that characterized the RMC book.
Using Crowe's book, I finally was able to pull all of the elements together that I needed for the exam. If I felt I didn't understand an area or feel 100% comfortable with it after reading Crowe's book, I went to the RMC book and researched it further. I found that after reading Crowe's book, I was able to pass the Rita Mulachy book's quizzes with 85%-90% scores. Something I wasn't able to do when I was reading the Rita Mulcahy book!
The ONLY thing that this book does better than the Crowe book is that the Rita questions are confusing, annoying, frustrating and frequently seem contradictory. This makes them very much like the PMP Exam! The questions from this book are tougher and prepare you better for the exam than the Crowe book. It's a shame the trademark snarky Rita Mulcahy tone comes out in so many of the answers. Snide remarks like "Did you forget that...." in lieu of real explanations appear far too frequently in the answers section of this book. I still don't get the point Mulcahy is trying to make while she unprofessionally insults the readers of her book.
In short, I only recommend this book for the exam questions, and even then, only halfheartedly. I passed the exam solidly on my first try just a few days ago, but credit for that rests solely on Andy Crowe's material. I don't think I would have been able to say that if I had just used "PMP Exam Prep" by Rita Mulcahy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 of 44 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One among the top three PMP Exam Guides, April 19, 2006
I have recently read a few PMP books cover to cover, and I thought I should share my experience with other readers with an intention to help them to find the right books. A brief review of what I think are the top three PMP books follows:
1. This book: The PMP Exam Prep.
It is a very good book if you are either taking a course from the author or from an instructor who is using this book as a text book. There are lots of exercises. Unfortunately, this is not a self contained book. Topics are not covered with enough depth. Also there is a poor flow and a lots of hopping from topic to topic. Moreover, it's outrageously high priced. Too many cross references and overhyped.
Overall I recommend this book of you are using it in a course.
2. The PMP Exam by Andy Crowe; Velociteach.
This is a great book and relatively self contained. You can study this book and pass the PMP exam. There are a only a few topics, which are not covered in adequate depth. In this and the preceding book, The coverage is organized around the knowledge areas while the exam objectives are organized in order of the process groups. That breaks the exam objective coverage into pieces, and may cause confusion.
I recommend this book if you are looking for a self contained book to pass the PMP exam.
3. PMP In Depth by Paul Sanghera, Thomson Course Technology.
This book has just hit the market and is relatively unknown. But I found this a rock solid book. Almost all the topics are covered with adequate depth. The material is presented in a logical learning sequence and the presentation is very cohesive: no hopping from topic to topic. It's an easy and interesting read. All concepts are clearly defined and expalined. This makes it a great book for both the PMP and the CAPM exams. I feel that the communication management could have more coverage. Although for the exams, the current coverage is enough.
The material is organized in order of the project lifecycle (the process groups) consistent with the way the exam objectives are organized. Furthermore, exam objectives covered in a chapter are explained in the beginning of the chapter. This makes the exam preparation easier and confusion-free.
I recommend this book for the PMP and the CAPM exams, and also if you just want to build a good understanding of the project management basics.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
I passed the PMP today, inspite of Rita's book..., September 3, 2006
When I started studying for the PMP, I started w/ Rita Mulcahy's book "PMP Exam Prep." After a few days of trying to learn the material her way, I gave up. It was almost as bad, dry, and confusing as reading the PMBOK guide itself. I did some research, read the reviews from Amazon and decided to try Andy Crowe's book. Whew, what a relief! The material is laid out in a way that it just makes sense and I would recommend the book (and have) to anyone who wants to learn the material. The book is really good at teaching the ITTOs, sequencing, and the processes and knowledge areas that you have to know for the exam. The material is easy to read and the repetition really does help you learn the material! HOWEVER, the tests provided at the end of chapters, at the end of the book, and on the provided website will give you a very big false sense of security! I was easily passing the provided tests with 80-90%s. When I purchased Rita Mulcahy's exam prep questions software ($$$), my percentage correct rate went from 80-90%s on Andy's tests to 50-60s with Rita's exam questions. When I finally was getting to really understand the process and procedures, and passing Rita's questions in the 80-90%s, not only did the questions Andy provided almost seem ridiculously easy, but I knew I was ready for the test.
HOWEVER, even though I knew the material cold, and could easily answer what ever Rita or Andy could throw at me, I only passed the PMP with a 78%.
Bottom Line: learn the material from Andy Crowe, test using other materials/merchandise.
P.S. even though the test was only 200 questions, when the first three questions of the exam is stuff you've never heard of, it makes for a very long day...
Good luck and I hope this info helps you!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
by Andy Crowe
by Frank T., Ph.D. Anbari
by Rita Mulcahy
