Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
33 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is what opera is all about!, February 13, 2003
If ever the was an opera recording that deserved the highest praise despite its technical deficiencies, this is it. Many reviewers below complain about this recording's sonics -- it is a live, mono recording from 1955. But focusing on sonic problems in the face of Callas's magnificent performance is like deprecating the *Mona Lisa* because there are a few cracks in the paint. Callas gives here the ultimate opera performance: she not only has complete command of the music, but she works within it to create a living, breathing character who develops during the course of, and as a result of, the drama. What she does is better than acting while singing; it is acting *by means of* singing. (And, I should add, the other principals are excellent.)If you have not yet listened to a lot of opera, or if you just want a recording that will sound pretty in the background, then you will probably not appreciate this set. As your tastes become more educated, however, return to this. You will be blown away.
|
|
|
27 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
THE BEST TRAVIATA, November 5, 2000
This was one of Callas's signature rolls. I have many recordings of Callas performing Traviata ('51,'52,'53,'55,'56,'58 Lisbon, '58 Covent Garden), but this is the best. The sound quality is a problem -- but not THAT big a problem. It's not in the realm of historical document; it's a recording that can easily be enjoyed just for pleasure. (The '51 Mexico is a BAD recording.) The '55 has it over on the others for several reasons: 1) Callas was in her best voice -- the first few years after her weight loss; so she has the distinct Callas sound, and at its strongest. 2) Her attack on the role is fierce and hair-raising in its passion and depth of feeling. Listen to her saying goodbye to Alfredo. Then compare that moment to anyone else's recording. No one, with the exception of Alagna's wife (her name escapes me) comes CLOSE. The Lisbon recording has better sound but slightly weaker passion, and this La Scala recording also has the advantage of de Stefano as Alfredo. Do not miss this.
|
|
|
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Beautiful but..., November 10, 2002
No one seems to deny that Callas is a definitive Violetta but there seems to be some arguement about the sound quality of her recordings of Traviata which are, unfortunately, all live.On this 1955 set, for me, the terrible recording quality of the third act does undermine my full enjoyment. I would advise a person new to Callas, Traviata or Opera in general to only purchase this version as a second or third supporting set to a set they already know & love. Altho also a live recording, the Callas 1958 Lisbon set is much improved (but not perfect) on the above 1955 set in terms of recording quality. I also like Te Kanawa's version from the early 1990's if you want to go stereo & digital. There are numerous others of great quality, by great singers depending on the style of singing & acting you like. Once you have another set to fall back on when you are not in the mood for the extremely poor sound mentioned above, then buy this 1955 Callas set & sit back and enjoy Callas's extremely moving virtuoso performance. It is worth it for that.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|