Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Two-Disc Special Edition) (Harry Potter 3) (2004)

In some respects I was not disappointed. Cuaron's interpretation of Harry's world is defined by inscrutable shadows and colored in misty greens and greys, rather than red-and-gold tapestry of movies one and two. This new palette is more natural, and in keeping with that, far more of the movie takes place out of doors. Cuaron gives Hogwarts a greater sense of age as well, making a crumbling courtyard and rickety bridge over a gorge central to many scenes. These locations, as well as the huge pendulum in the entry hall and clock face that Harry sits inside at one point, are a nicely subtle way to weave in the movie's (and book's) theme of time and how the past can't ever be completely undone.

Cuaron handles some scenes very well, especially brief, telling gestures or moments that provide character definition, such as the bit where Hermione grabs Ron's hand which made it into the trailer, and another where the two of them have an awkward conversation outside the Shrieking Shack. Other highlights include Harry and his dorm-mates up late eating candy that makes them impersonate animals (touchingly shows how very teenage they are); and a moment when Sirius, trying desperately to hold Lupin back from his change to werewolf, places his hand over Lupin's chest and says "You live in this heart!" - which is made all the more poignant because we know he can't stop the transformation.

Some plot points have been sacrificed in order to keep the film to a manageable length. Most of the time this works, as when Harry meets with Snape and Lupin in a beautifully lit nighttime corridor, precipitating the handover of the Marauder's Map and Lupin's realization that Peter Pettigrew lives; or when Harry receives the Firebolt from Sirius at a different point in the movie than in the book. There were, however, two changes which seemed inexplicable to me. First, the patronus charm is made into a shield of light rather than an animal which charges down the dementors. This eliminates Harry's discovery of his father within himself through his stag patronus (he does see a stag of light when he rescues himself at the lakeside, but when we see him from the perspective of rescuer there is no stag, and this is never explained). Similarly, even though Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot and Prongs are named on the Marauder's Map, the nicknames and their relationship to Lupin, Pettigrew, Sirius, and James Potter is never explained. It would have taken only a few more minutes to add that explosition, which would have strengthened Harry's cinematic connections to his father tremendously.

All in all, I think it's possible that the viewers who enjoy this film the most will be those who haven't read the book. As someone who is very familiar with the Harry Potter book series, I kept finding myself hung up on the changes to the story (and just how much depth was lost) even as I enjoyed the beautiful cinemetography and deft handling of characters' relationships. My hope is that whoever directs film four is able to take some of Cuaron's artistic sensibilities and combine them with Columbus's sense of wonder and attention to plot detail. That would truly do Harry justice.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews   Was this review helpful to you?

Report this | Permalink Comment Comment

Firstly the cast are, as always, perfect. Alan Rickman in particular. Could we really have asked for a better Snape? I think not! But, there is a disappointing lack of screen time for every character other than Harry. Fair enough, he is the lead, but the other characters are interesting and refreshing. more would have been appreciated. I found Harry more likeable in this film. He seems more mischevious, as opposed to full of self importance and interfering like in film 1. There was not enough Siruis and Professor McGonnagal got a mere 2 lines at the most. Ron was a background character, as was hermione. Malfoy is barely in the film. I was surprised

The change of director had had profound changes on the layout of Hogwarts. By film 2, viewers would have been familiar with the castle layout. The courtyard is familiar. Film 3 is very different. Hagrid's hut, for example, is now a long distance from thr school gates (along a bridge, along a path, down a hill in a little valley). I'm concerned that with evry different director, will Hogwarts change every time? I hope not.

Secondly, fans of the books will be disappointed about just how much is cut out. For those who haven't read the book, I suggest you do if you want the full story. The film does not tell the viewer who the authors of the mauraders map are, something which I think is important to know. We don't find out who sent Harry the firebolt. There is no explaination from Dumbledore about Professor Trelawney's other prediction (that Neville could be Voldemort's nemesis, not Harry) The film was far too skimmed over. I think the director just presumed that viewers would know the books inside out and wouldn't have to put in the slightly important detail.

On a brighter note, it is by far funnier that the first two. There are more jokes and must be seen bits like Hermione punching Malfoy. It's quite a bit scarier that the first 2 as well. The dementors are well done, as were the flying scenes with the firebolt at the end, and flying with Buckbeak. The sucess of Harry Potter, and the depth of its appeal can be seen when I went to see the film. There were more adult guys there than kids! Most were more excited that the kids as well.

The story is better, the acting is generally better (Dan Radcliffe is a bit static, but Alan Rickman makes up for that)the jokes are better and the effects are seamless.

Overall I'd give it 9/10. Just too much scenery changed, and far too much cut from the book. I recommend this film to any fan of Harry Potter. But, I strongly recommend reading the book beforehand. That way you can fill in the gaps that the director leaves wide open.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews   Was this review helpful to you?

Report this | Permalink Comment Comment