Interesting that you cover in depth all the links I posted other than the two which do deal with and mention Arabs and then claim that because another does not mention Arabs that it has nothing to do with this thread.
I posted them to give a flavour of their output which prior to this you had characterised as not something you agreed with but mainly to do with pointing out anti Semitic literature. Do you now contend that they could not have used the language I stated given the tone of their other output which I provided links to?
I can find you links to any amount of right wing settler's organisations. If I remember correctly the last time I did post something on their actions it was greeted with "We'll it's understandable that they would attack Palestinians because the Palestinians are attacking them" Which is a bizarre logic when they are settling someone else's land and also "You cannot believe anything from an Muslim Palestinian source because the Quran tells them they can lie"
Why would I offer any rebuttal to your Palestinian clips as I have never argued that the Palestinians and many of their groups are morally bankrupt. I have no problem seeing that the Palestinians have had some terrible leadership and committed some atrocities it's just that unlike you I can also see some reprehensible actions carried out by the Israeli side and some hate filled and promoting groups on their side.
It's the difference between a bigot and a rational person.
I still want you to explain what radical Islam had to do with the French riots. You've never shown any interest in avoiding pointing out anything bad about Islam prior to this but you seem really keen to avoid this one.