|
270 of 274 people found the following review helpful
This review is from: Sony HDR-CX150 16GB High Definition Handycam Camcorder (Black) (Electronics)
I bought this camera on Monday, had fun with it for two days, and then returned it. Although I can't afford it, I then closed my eyes and ordered the HDR-CX550V. I basically went from the bottom of the Sony consumer class to the top in one fell swoop.Things I liked about the CX150: * FABULOUS quality in adequate light. The video in 24 Mbps mode is stunning. Search YouTube for examples. Every hair on my cat, dust particles in sunlight, it all shows up with beautiful resolution. It's amazing. Almost Blu-Ray quality. You won't find any consumer-class camcorder with better quality. * 25x zoom , when used with a tripod, lets you get really close * "macro" works without any special settings. Just put the lens an inch away and it will focus. Resolves fingerprints. * Amazingly tiny. With no hard drive or tape drive, the unit is frighteningly small. You can put it and all the cables + charger in a camera case designed for a DSLR + telephoto * PMB software works, has good basic editing. Used it to grab frames from movies - almost don't need the "still" function if 1990x1080 res is good enough. * It will take a 32GB memory stick, even though the feature list says they only support 16. * The touch screen is responsive * "touch the object" spot focus, spot white balance is cool * Give it the NP-FV70 battery and it will record for hours and hours Things I either did not like or features missing (by "missing" I realize that you have to pay more). Don't mistake the length of my 'cons' list as hating the little guy - it's a good camera for what it is designed to be. * A bit pricey. I think it is worth about $450.00, not the $549.00 list * No wide-angle. I wish Sony had made the lens go from slightly wide-angle to about 15x, instead of from normal to 25x. * No external mic input * No hot shoe - not even the Sony proprietary one * Zoom motor noise is very audible in quiet settings - don't expect to use this camera to record acoustic orchestral music in concert halls * The "smooth slow-mo 240 fps" is NOT HD 1080i60 quality. Might be OK at 720, but I found it disappointingly blurry. I'd love to see it have the same capability as the Casio EX-FX1 (not holding breath) * Not enough buttons - too much reliance on the touch screen. I prefer buttons to scrolling through menus. Sony could fix this by providing more than 6 "my menu" choices. * Auto focus works good most of the time, but when it gets confused it is horrible. Combine that with no quick focus wheel and it is a recipe for loosing shots * Picture mode is not available in 24 Mbps HD mode. * The electronic stabilization does not work. I've grown used to optical stabilization in my DSC-H50 and there is no going back. * Short of using something like the Black Rapid Straps Fasten-R2 screwed into the tripod shoe, there is no way to attach a neck strap. I almost dropped it several times. * The plastic housing is sensitive to noise - any little touch while recording will show up as sound in the video. * No windscreen for the mics. Combine that with no external mic capability and you won't be able to hear anything in windy conditions. * No remote * No "night shot" infrared * Low light performance is what you would expect from a small lens size. All the electronics in the world can't fully compensate for glass area. Summary: if you want a fairly cheap, tiny camera for shooting GREAT quality vids of vacations, the kids and the pets, this is an excellent choice. Want to do more, and you will need to pay more for a better unit. Just want to help other people avoid my experience of being a bit disappointed and having to trade up. Comments
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-8 of 8 posts in this discussion
Initial post:
Apr 5, 2010 12:40:14 PM PDT
Odin7 says:
"I then closed my eyes and ordered the HDR-CX550V." - Stephen, I just did the same and now have the 550v in hand. I've noticed a couple of quirks and would like to compare notes when you get yours. Thanks
Posted on
May 3, 2010 10:22:48 PM PDT
Rob Neff says:
So when are we going to see your review for the HDR-CX550V? : )
In reply to an earlier post on
May 9, 2010 4:39:33 AM PDT
Gabriella I. Conte says:
Yes exactly - there are not many reviews for the CX 550 at the moment but the ones I've seen say it is excellent. Probably the Canon HFS 21 is slightly better in image quality but other than that it seems the best that money can buy!!
I went from the Sanyo FH1 to the CX 550 in the space of 3 hours.....plus blu ray burner, tripod, extra battery...
Posted on
Aug 21, 2010 8:40:28 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Aug 21, 2010 8:41:18 PM PDT
L Lee says:
Have you burned your videos do a dvd? If so, was it easy to do?
Posted on
Oct 29, 2010 5:10:16 AM PDT
Con Sumer says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]
Posted on
Nov 25, 2011 3:54:37 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 25, 2011 3:54:50 PM PST
Andrew Kruczek says:
I'm confused. You said the camera was too expensive, then said "if you want a fairly cheap, tiny camera for shooting GREAT quality vids of vacations, the kids and the pets, this is an excellent choice." What's cheap about a $500 camcorder?
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
|
Review Details |