Facility Spring Cleaning Textbook Trade In Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon Sixx AM Fire TV Stick Gifts for Mom to look and feel great Made in Italy Amazon Gift Card Offer out2 out2 out2  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors Kindle Paperwhite AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Shop Now SnS
Customer Review

228 of 244 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars In some ways, the G-Shock sucks, August 19, 2012
This review is from: DW5600E-1V G-Shock Classic Digital Watch (Watch)
This watch is really lousy at many things.

Women will not fantasize about how big and hard your wallet is when they see the G-Shock. It looks terrible with a leisure suit, and worse with a tuxedo. Donald Trump would mot be caught dead with one. It will not impress anyone at a power meeting in a corporate board room. Really does not go with the outfit if you are a male stripper with Chippendale's or a clown with Barnum and Bailey.

The G-Shock does have a few minor benefits. Mine has been deeper than 300' repeatedly with me on deep techical dives, working flawlessly. I never got deep enough for the pressure to kill it, and I have been deep. Indeed, before reliable dive computers were developed, the G-Shock was favored by the deep and cave diving pioneers because it actually kept working at extreme depths, unlike a lot of big name watches that were supposed to. So this thing will put up with far more water than most watches, regardless of price.

And there is also the tiny benefit of shock resistance, but is that just slick advertising? Well, years ago when I was a lot younger, my buddies and I would get the idea that we should torture-test the watch to see if it was really shock resistant. There may have been quite a bit of beer involved, but I have no clear recollection of that. It survived falls off off 6-story buildings (okay, it was forcefully thrown downwards from those heights after the first couple falls). My friend with the pitcher's arm threw it out the window of a speeding car as hard as he could, hitting traffic signs. Over cliffs, over whatever. The case would be ragged, but the watch would keep running fine . . . UNLESS something hard and pointed went through the glass face. That was the only thing that would do in the watch, and it was not easy to have that happen.

We ran over it a few times with the car, which jacked up the band but didn't phase the module.

It did totally fail when shot with a .22, though the back of the case could withstand all air rifles. Yeah, we wasted some money on the 5 or 6 watches we did in over the years trying to find what the limits were, but the beer cost more.

Basically, this watch will survive depths and impacts far worse than you could ever possible survive. Which is another failure for the watch: the coroner will not get a good time of death from your watch because it won't stop like everyone elses when your plane crashes. He might even steal it because he is so impress that it survived . . . and he doesn't have to worry about the water hurting it as he washes your blood and gore off the watch.

But it still won't make women think you have a lot of money.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 3 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 16 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Feb 24, 2013 10:04:56 AM PST
Bravo.

Posted on Dec 16, 2013 1:19:18 PM PST
Scott says:
Well done.

Posted on Dec 19, 2013 8:02:25 AM PST
ep_dub says:
This is the best review of any watch ever, period. I bought one 10 minutes after reading this and am not sad about it.

Posted on Jan 1, 2014 10:26:10 AM PST
5port says:
If you don't work for Casio now...you should.

Posted on May 11, 2014 4:32:04 PM PDT
Trigeminy6 says:
I am glad after reading this that I already bought one:
1. already married. no impressions to make.
2. already own several glocks, so no more torture tests needed.
3. it feels absent when it is there and aware when I need it keyboarding.
4. I will go ahead and start my swimming exercises with this one, noting the above tests.
great addition, even if out at a nice meal and play, or visiting the museum. (-:

Posted on Jul 4, 2014 10:25:35 AM PDT
Well, if you go deep enough (as you stated) then women don't care at all about your watch. Haha.

Posted on Jul 21, 2014 10:51:49 PM PDT
[Deleted by the author on Jul 21, 2014 10:52:09 PM PDT]

Posted on Sep 20, 2014 3:33:19 PM PDT
R says:
Well done.

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 13, 2015 4:42:16 PM PST
Well played, sir, well played.

(Of course 7 months is too long for a reply. I know that, but high five anyway.)

Posted on Jul 7, 2015 11:26:16 PM PDT
My name is Jerry and I'm logged on my wife's account I'm sold, you made my day!
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›