Customer Review

19 of 23 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Latter-day Liberty is a ground-breaking book, November 21, 2011
This review is from: Latter-day Liberty: A Gospel Approach to Government and Politics (Paperback)
I have never met Connor Boyack. We are friends on Facebook, and I enjoy his blog Connor's Conundrums, which deals with politics from a Mormon perspective. Let there be no doubt: Connor is a real libertarian, not a mamby-pamby fly-by-night libertarian like somebody like me. He hates the state with a passion, and could correctly be described as a Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist. He is anti-war, anti-state and pro-market, but most importantly pro-liberty.

But the truth is that we are living in the age of libertarianism, mostly because all of the predictions made by people like Rothbard are becoming true literally before our eyes. There is no way of understanding our current economic malaise (in my opinion) without understanding the key role of monetary policy in creating stagflation and without understanding that business cycles are inevitable. Markets must be allowed to clear. Government intervention, as we have seen with TARP and the many bailouts, only makes things worse, and at the end of the day it is the poor and the middle-class workers who suffer the most while the well-connected profit from our misery. Meanwhile, we are seeing the folly and horror of endless wars and the loss of our civil liberties.

Connor's positions make many intellectual Mormons very uncomfortable. He is clearly a smart guy, but he is so darned dogmatic. And he seems to think he know the answer to everything. And he is so consistent, always arguing for more liberty and less government. Doesn't he know the world is much more complicated than he claims? And doesn't he know that all good Mormons must always be in favor of more government to show they actually care about the poor.

Well, as Connor shows in his book "Latter-Day Liberty, A Gospel Approach to Government and Politics," all good Mormons should be in favor of liberty, not confiscating other peoples' money so you can be beneficent with it. But make no mistake: Connor's book will also make many traditional conservatives very uncomfortable. He is anti-war and lays out an unassailable case that the Book of Mormon creates a well-developed just war theory. He is pro-immigrant, pointing out that "it is an inescapable fact that the current immigration laws are founded upon racism and protectionism." And he is against the war on drugs.

To sum up: Connor Boyack will upset a lot of people with this book.

Still, "Latter-Day Liberty" is, in my opinion, one of those books that Mormons simply must read. It is a groundbreaking book at a crucial time. In this day and age, a book must have an original, compelling message and also have a good self-promoting author to be successful. "Latter-Day Liberty" has both.

This book has a forward by Mark Skousen, perhaps the most famous living libertarian Mormon. He started Freedom Fest, the single biggest libertarian event of the year, which takes place every July in Las Vegas. Ron Paul also has read Connor's book, and gives it a great review. Tom Woods, perhaps the smartest living economist and historian, also gives it a hearty thumbs-up.

So this is a book that you should take very seriously. Many intellectual Mormons will be talking about it. I predict great angst on the part of left-leaning Mormons, a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth, that Connor dares to challenge progressive orthodoxy. But I also predict many conservative Mormons will sputter and spew about his "isolationist" foreign policy and his support of "amnesty" for illegal immigrants.

But Connor makes his points brilliantly, mixing basic logic with literally hundreds of quotations from modern-day prophets and the scriptures. I predict very few of the people who try to refute Connor's book will be able to do so without resorting to ad hominems: his arguments are simply too good and too consistent to be overcome very easily.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 2 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Dec 3, 2011 2:14:32 PM PST
"could correctly be described as a Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist."
I believe he would disagree with you there. He certainly opposes the state in it's current form and the powers that it assumes, but I think it is incorrect to characterize him as anti-state generally. Whatever label he is willing to apply to himself, I am confident that "anarcho-" would not be a prefix to any of them.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 16, 2011 3:29:52 PM PST
"Anarcho-capitalist" means zero state involvement in our capitalist system (not complete anarchy from government). So, he had better be an "Anarcho-capitalist" if he's a true libertarian.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 19, 2012 3:47:21 PM PST
I hate to think that we are disagreeing over definitions, but maybe it would be good to explain myself. When I say anarcho-capitalist, I am referring to people like Murray Rothbard, Hans Herman-Hoppe, Robert Murphey and the like. These men are anarchists (no need for prefixes). They oppose the state and believe that its natural tendency is to grow and to usurp more and more power. They do not claim that "our capitalist system" can coexist with the state because government's very nature is to intervene in what they would consider to be the natural order of things. Further, they claim that any function the state performs could be carried out (more efficiently) by private interests.

There are many libertarians who are not anarchists and believe, as you seem to, that the state needs to divorce itself from economic affairs and I would agree with that, but I would not call it anarcho-capitalism.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Top Reviewer Ranking: 20,681,343