114 of 124 people found the following review helpful
We ignore this book (and Christian nationalism) at our peril.,
This review is from: Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism (Paperback)
As someone who grew up in a home influenced by apocalyptic Christian fundamentalism, I admit right up front that I will not attempt an "objective" review of this book (whatever that might mean). I agreed with the premise Michelle Goldberg outlines (i.e., that there is a powerful strand of politicized Christianity in the US that holds the Constitution in contempt and that seeks absolute political control---Goldberg calls them "Christian nationalists") before she ever set fingers to keyboard. Frankly, I was amazed at the empathy and understanding with which Michelle Goldberg approached this material, and found that one of the strongest features of this book. Another of the strengths is in her willingness to let her subjects speak for themselves. Oftentimes the most damning comments come straight from the mouths of the Christian nationalists themselves, and Goldberg does a fine job of putting these quotes into an overall context that should chill anyone who still appreciates the ideals of the Enlightenment.
For example, Goldberg repeatedly exposes a Manichean worldview in which the American body politic is literally divided into black and white, good and evil, with the Christian nationalists on one side and the rest of us on the other. (I leave it for you to guess which side is "good.") "Thus every political issue--indeed, every disputed aspect of our national life--is a struggle between good and evil" (p. 4). She quotes Pastor Rod Parsley: "Everyone asks, `Why is it so close?' The light is getting lighter and the dark is getting darker. These two opponents are not just opponents. This is a values situation. This is lightness and darkness!" (p. 51). As Goldberg sagaciously notes, people have a perfect right to this Manichean worldview, "yet when the United States government works this way, it turns all nonevangelicals into "the other side." The nonreligious are no longer even part of the debate..." (152). I would also note that in this view, the "wrongly religious" (i.e., those who don't accept a particular collection of tenets about God, the Bible, etc.) are also left out of the debate.
Of course, though, this point is moot, because making the US an overtly Christian country, in which the nonreligious and "wrongly religious" are second-class citizens at best, is one aspect of the Christian nationalist agenda: "Among [evangelicals and born-again Christians] there is substantial support for amending the United States Constitution to make Christianity the country's official religion..." (9). Leaving us out of the debate makes sense to Christian Reconstructionist theologian R.J. Rushdoony, who denounced democracy as a "heresy and `the great love of the failures and cowards of life'" (38). Whereas many try to sugarcoat this agenda for wider consumption, the raw truth is available for the flock: "Christians have an obligation, a mandate, a commission, a holy responsibility to reclaim the land for Jesus Christ--to have dominion in civil structures, just as in every other aspect of life and godliness. But it is dominion we are after. Not just a voice. It is dominion we are after. Not just influence. It is dominion we are after. Not just equal time. It is dominion we are after. World conquest. That's what Christ has commissioned us to accomplish" (p. 41, Goldberg quoting George Grant's The Changing of the Guard: Biblical Principles for Political Action.)
This antidemocratic, authoritarian philosophy can't stand up to the scrutiny of the contemporary world, though, and so, as Goldberg explores in the bulk of her book, the Christian nationalists have set to work building an alternate reality in which myth is science, fiction is history, and public policy is faith-based. From the continued intrusion of creationists in our public schools, to the campaign to refashion the Founding Fathers as Christian nationalists, to publicly funded abstinence-only sex education classes, there is a parallel reality alongside ours. "Originally, conservative Christian activists just wanted to keep Darwin and sex education out of schools. When that didn't work, they developed an alternative, quasi-scientific infrastructure that would legitimate their religious beliefs in secular terms, and which they hoped to use to replace the doctrines they objected to" (p. 138). "To the Christian nationalists...publicly funded religious social services auger nothing less than an epistemological revolution. They allow knowledge derived from the Bible to trump knowledge derived from studying the world. No longer would American policy and American civic life be based on facts available to all of us, on the kind of rationality that looks at `objective or even secular outcomes.' It would be based on faith" (p. 127). "What's lacking, though, isn't just truth--it's the entire social mechanism by which truth is distinguished from falsehood. Blunting Christian nationalism requires turning toward the Enlightenment and rebuilding a culture of rationalism. Unfortunately, multitudes of Americans no longer find Enlightenment values compelling" (p. 181).
That last sentence sums up what is possibly the biggest challenge posed by the theocratic right. Because they no longer find the Enlightenment values of empiricism and reason "compelling," they are assaulting the very criteria for establishing truth claims. Readers of this review may think this an exaggeration, but I can assure you from my experience as an undergraduate instructor that many students can no longer distinguish between fact and opinion, a consequence of twenty-plus years of a concentrated disinformation campaign. "This is a pattern that repeats itself again and again in the culture wars. When experts discredit some bit of fundamentalist orthodoxy, it's taken as further proof of the experts' bias. When religious conservatives are proven wrong, their faith in their righteousness only grows, along with their hatred of the conspiracy they see arrayed against them" (p. 78). "With no agreement on the most basic of facts or sources of authority, discussions between today's creationists and evolutionists seem particularly futile. Dialogue is impossible without some shared sense of reality" (p. 93). Lest the reader think this is merely an academic issue with no bearing on the real world, they need to remind themselves that this alternate reality is populated by pharmacists who confuse themselves with theologians and/or doctors: "A rash of Christian pharmacists have refused to fill prescriptions for both the morning-after pill and for ordinary oral contraceptives--180 such incidents were reported in one six-month period in 2004....In Denton, Texas, three pharmacists working at an Eckerd drug store refused to fill a rape victim's prescription for the morning-after pill" (p. 156). In other words, these ideas and beliefs have real consequences for people, especially for those who don't hold these ideas and beliefs.
Others have critiqued Goldberg for her comparisons to fascists, whom they usually equate unequivocally with Nazis. While comparisons to Nazis are always inflammatory and rarely helpful, we must remember that fascism has some definable characteristics and that most (if not all) of the movements Goldberg describes can be seen to share many of these characteristics. If it walks like duck, etc. Others have taken her to task for conflating Christian fundamentalists with Christian evangelicals with Christian nationalists with theocrats etc., implying that because the Christian nationalist movement is decentralized and diffuse that it is not real at all. These criticisms, all specious, are tactics employed by the theocratic right, along with a cynical use of "religious liberty," to pursue a pernicious agenda under the radar. We ignore Goldberg's book and the movements to which she alludes at our peril.
Tracked by 1 customer
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-9 of 9 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 23, 2007 11:24:53 AM PDT
Jeff Pickens says:
Jason thank you for such an excellent review. I think yours is the best review I've ever read. Let me know if you ever decide to write a book!
Respectfully, Jeff P
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 12, 2007 2:40:20 PM PST
Jason Mierek says:
Thanks Jeff! Much appreciated. This place is my main creative outlet at the moment, although I do have all sorts of fun ideas for writing projects. Stay tuned!
Posted on Aug 29, 2009 6:11:34 AM PDT
reality bites says:
Brilliant review Jason. We all need to be eternally vigilant.
Posted on Mar 23, 2010 5:11:29 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Mar 23, 2010 5:11:48 PM PDT
Like the others, I want to thank you for an excellent review.
Posted on Mar 12, 2011 5:00:33 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Mar 12, 2011 5:08:48 PM PST
This is a great review, Jason. I also grew up with a similar background in evangelical Christianity. Thank goodness I was able to attend college and learn to think critically and challenge what I was told to believe, although I was already questioning some of the political stances of our church. And yes, Goldberg is absolutely correct in reporting that politics are preached from the pulpit. The congregation is directly or indirectly told how to vote as 'good' Christians.
When I first arrived at college I was surprised to find that not all Americans grew up believing in the same God, etc. I had a very sheltered childhood. I am still a Christian but I disagree politically with the Christian right on the majority of issues. I think it's important for people who don't come from a similar background as us and who may not believe Christian nationalism is such a threat to realize that children who grow up in these environments are not taught to critically think at all. They are taught that the exercise of faith is to believe something when all evidence points against it. This produces a multitude that will accept anything a 'man of the cloth' says as the word of God without question. It doesn't matter how many lives this has the potential to ruin because they see this unquestioning obedience as an affirmation of their faith. They are scary precisely because they believe it is their duty to make sure (forcibly through law, if necessary) the rest of us live the way they choose to live because they know what is best for us. This is a prime pool of followers (sheep) for anyone with political ambitions and it has been taken advantage of and utilized by the Christian nationalist leaders to the detriment of Christians and non-Christians alike.
Posted on Mar 14, 2011 10:49:37 PM PDT
Global Citizen says:
I too, am awestruck. An amazingly thoughtful review.
Count me in to stay tuned!
Posted on Apr 18, 2011 12:32:35 PM PDT
You said, "I can assure you from my experience as an undergraduate instructor that many students can no longer distinguish between fact and opinion, a consequence of twenty-plus years of a concentrated disinformation campaign." That is an interesting statement that I have no doubt is true; yet I guess I don't see it as unique to efforts by religious conservatives. The "outsider game" that says, "you can't trust the 'experts' because they have a vested interest in continuing to lie to you" is played by anyone with an extreme agenda. The books by Mary Lefkowitz and her fight against shoddy Afrocentricism (that says that the Greeks stole all their culture from ancient Egypt, and this knowledge has been suppressed by whites for political reasons) documents well the same mentality and a similar affect on undergraduates.
I haven't read "Kingdom Coming" so I don't know for sure, but I somehow doubt that concerns it raises are unique to evangelicals. I'd think anyone with a narrow world-view and enough will and organizational ability can be accused of contributing to this climate of hostility to intellectual rigor that causes people to no longer be able to discern between fact and opinion.
Posted on Jun 18, 2011 6:15:59 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 18, 2011 6:24:39 PM PDT
James D. ODell says:
Excellent commentary. I also agree with the people who remind us that the threat is not coming at us from religious circles, alone. The common thread is a pernicious "king of the hill" exercise, using anything and everything available to trump the opposite number in an argument. Regarding religious extremists, it is tantamount to worship of the Bible, the written word, in place of the God of the Bible. There are those who view the Constitution as an object of reverence, in place of reference. It is idolatry, in that sense.
There is nothing in the Word that instructs us to establish a theocracy, looking toward the Second Coming. It may grow from the simplistic view that, if something is right for me, how can it be otherwise for everyone else. Recalling the disastrous attempt, in public education, to end classroom disputes by declaring that everyone was right (called Values-Free Education), it now appears that Christian Nationalists
have gone 180 in the opposite direction. As a forum for multiple beliefs, democracy is anathema to them. Fundamentally, they are materialists, convinced that the material world must conform to the spiritual, reflecting their world view, which, they believe, has been imparted to them through religious experience.
In the height of the charismatic movement, someone declared that he had no need to study languages, because the Holy Spirit would enable him to speak in whatever tongue the situation required. The venerated excuse for homework not done, "the dog ate my pencil," can't compete with "God said that I didn't need a pencil." Or a book, or a teacher.
Like Ayn Rand's view of capitalism, the unbridled pursuit of wealth for its own sake, with no tolerance for middle ground--or a middle class--we're talking self-annointed
grab for power, to no ultimate purpose. Perhaps, that is why some observers don't take the movement seriously.
After all, in the same breath, these are the same people who rail against the presumed threat of "one-world government."
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 18, 2012 5:20:36 PM PST
Battana Chandrasena says:
Put my name down too please.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›