Customer Review

51 of 58 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Witty? Yes. But vague and insufficient as well., July 3, 2004
This review is from: The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (Hardcover)
I own and have been extremely happy with Oxfords "Dictionary of World Religions" (J. Bower ed.) and was hoping for something similar with Blackburn's dictionary. However, I'm sadly disappointed. Rather than the concise, informative, flowing style of Bowker's work, I find broad generalizations, questions rather than statements and several entries ended in "this is much debated."
Of course, to those completely new to Philosophy this may be far more useful than direct, clear definitions of terms, but to any student of philosophy, this text will soon prove more frustrating than useful.
I would suggest the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, (R. Audi ed.) for a much broader, clearer, (albeit less charming) Dictionary.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 6, 2010 1:42:32 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 10, 2010 7:41:32 AM PDT
I've been looking for a good dictionary of Philosophy, not because I am a philosophy student (Though I am taking theory of knowledge in college right now), but I've have moderate exposure to the field, I've studied the Plato, Aristotles, Sextus Empiricus as well as Descartes, Hume, Lock, and Leibniz (But in more layman terms than the actual text). I just finished Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Quine's Two Dogma's of Empricism... Oh and Kripke's A priori, necessity and contigency... Now I didn't get the last too very well, specially Quine's, So after all this text... Would you recommend this dictionary or Cambridge's? I just want to get the best bang for me buck! Thanks mate! (Or I could check if they have them in Borders... Might not though)

BRR! I just checked... They do not!
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Bristol, England

Top Reviewer Ranking: 10,952,727