4 of 66 people found the following review helpful
Author mistakes convolution for insight,
This review is from: In Defense of Natural Law (Hardcover)
While the book does a reasonable job of tackling the subject matter, the author overuses compound sentences. Rather than clearly stating his points, the author loses his readers in a flurry of poorly constructed sentences and lists of names. I would recommend finding a more concise read with fewer unnecessary and repetitive words.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 20, 2016 7:44:45 PM PDT
James Ellis says:
I'm to believe that the professor's intellect pales in comparison to yours? Perhaps you are beneath the book, not the book beneath you.
Posted on May 13, 2016 7:14:00 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 13, 2016 7:15:22 PM PDT
I Review Garbage says:
You mistake your intellectual mediocrity for a failing on the author's part. Do learn the difference.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›