25 of 25 people found the following review helpful
This review is from: Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Times (Paperback)
This is a most unusual book. It is informative, perplexing, provocative. It has influenced my thinking more than any other book.
There are mainly two juxtapositions the author uses to distinguish liberty from equality: Catholicism with Protestantism and democracy with monarchy. In discussing religion and politics, Kuehnelt-Leddihn appeals to European and America history. The religious-history discussion focuses on Luther while the political-history discussion offers a rare and undoubtedly romanticized glimpse of life under Renaissance and Baroque-period monarchies. The political-history discussion continues through the French Revolution and culminates in the rise of Nazism.
This is not a history book, though. K-L goes far beyond his historical sketches with an ongoing and much deeper philosophical consideration of his two juxtapositions. And if his historical insights are great, K-L's philosophy is simply astonishing. He shows the American man-on-the-street's understanding of such things as Canon Law, majority rule, and education is woefully inadequate. He challenges the common understanding of Catholicism as "strict", the near-universal faith in democracy, and the widely-held belief that education must be provided to all. This constant opposition to conventional wisdom sets up an important theme late in the book: good governance is lost among the amateur voters and rulers that comprise a democracy. Skillful ruling and diplomacy is the hallmark of monarchy.
Many who read this book will undoubtedly come away with new political considerations. But for me, there is also the even more powerful new consideration of religion. Of course, the two may very well be inseparable for K-L readers anyway, since he is so deeply skeptical of the church-state separation. Even on its own, though, the analysis of Catholicism and Protestantism was compelling; it has deepened my interest in theology and elevated my respect for the the Church.
One star is missing from my rating because the book is a very challenging read and unnecessarily so. My main complaint is that the book is poorly organized. It meanders. But I do very much like the language he uses and appreciate the thorough annotations.
I recommend Liberty or Equality to anyone who finds mainstream political media to be disastrous, is frustrated by No Child Gets Ahead, or can approach the religion-vs-secularism debate with intellectual honesty.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 1, 2011 1:07:52 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 1, 2011 1:09:31 PM PDT
Philip E. Sommers says:
"No Child Gets Ahead" What a wonderful use of language.
Posted on Sep 18, 2014 6:44:52 PM PDT
Alexander Falbo says:
What a brilliant summary. I cherish this work and this review excels.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›