380 of 416 people found the following review helpful
How the Towers turned to dust,
This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 (Hardcover)
I am delighted to finally see Dr. Judy Wood's book about the disintegration of New York's World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, appear in print. It has been a long time coming but well worth the wait.
Based in large part on her website and on the research she's been doing for over eight years, "Where Did the Towers Go?" is an exhaustive study of what happened to those two, quarter mile high, 110-storey skyscrapers on that horrible day and how they literally disappeared to dust. A structural engineering firm involved in building the Trade Center estimated there should have been almost 1.2 million tons of rubble. But, because we see mostly dust and unburned paper on the ground and a minimum of debris in the basements, Dr. Wood asks, "Where did it all go?"
With over 500 excellent color photographs, many charts and graphs, and solid calculations from an expert in mechanical and materials engineering, Professor Wood challenges the official story of 9/11 with compelling evidence that cannot be denied. Her study should convince anyone still skeptical of any alternative explanation as to what happened to the Towers that day that the generally accepted media and government explanation is utter nonsense.
Step by step, Dr. Wood takes us for an in-depth look at what really happened. She suggests that we have been brainwashed from the very beginning moments of the tragedy into believing the story we were being told on television. She shows us that we did not see what we thought we saw. In fact, she shows us clearly that we have been carefully deceived.
Dr. Wood starts by examining the free-fall speed at which the buildings began to plummet, but also graphically explains that very little of the huge structures actually ended up hitting the ground. In fact, the seismic data and the very limited ground penetration and destruction proves an overwhelming amount of material of the Towers was quickly turned to a very fine dust that spread both horizontally outward and vertically upward to form large plumes that finally settled on the streets of lower Manhattan and out into the rivers. One by one, Wood dismisses the official explanation as well as some of the alternate explanations from various 9/11 truth movements.
For me, the lack of a debris pile is the most convincing evidence that the Towers did not topple but were disintegrated on the spot in about 10 seconds each. It does not appear to be action of pulverization but more of what Dr. Wood calls "dustification".
She invents new and clever terms to describe what we saw that day and now see in the recorded photos. She does this in order to erase any pre-conceived ideas of what happened, telling us that the human mind always looks for answers by relating what it experiences to events it has observed before and to what is familiar to it. When the brain sees something totally new, it attempts to explain the phenomenon using what is in its memory. For this particular event, we must guard against that tendency, and descriptions using a new vocabulary help us do that. We begin to see what we thought we saw and what we were told to believe we saw in a different way. Only then can we begin to glimpse the truth of what took place.
Addressed in the book are many unpleasant subjects that most of us do not want to remember. We start to see the people who jumped to their deaths from a new angle. We see vertical circular holes in adjacent World Trade Center buildings that we were never shown before. We see cars blocks away that were "toasted" or flipped over. We see large steel beams and columns bent, twisted, thinned and rusted in peculiar ways that heat cannot cause. We see weird fires and fuming dirt on the ground for blocks...fuming that continues for months. We see WTC Building 7 completely destroyed after 5 pm that afternoon, never having been shown to be hit by an airplane. We see steel turned to "jelly", metal peeled, fusion of dissimilar materials, strange rounded holes in glass, and thinning and extremely rapid aging of materials in just a matter of hours. And, we read the recorded and documented testimony of dozens of first responders such as firefighters and emergency rescue workers that the debris from two 500,000+ ton Towers was almost non-existent.
Dr. Wood goes on in the latter chapters of the book to acquaint us with something she calls the "Tesla-Hutchison Effect" and its similarities to what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. She makes a good case for the use of a directed energy weapon based on that method. It involves setting up what's called a field effect by the interference of different types of energies concentrated on a particular target. There really is nothing new here: genius inventor Nikola Tesla demonstrated such effect a hundred years ago.
As with Judy Wood, I, too, thought it was very strange that the Towers "came down" on 9/11, but I couldn't put my finger on what could have really caused their demise. Now, with the release of this groundbreaking volume of work I am beginning to see the truth. I am beginning to see what I did not see before or what I was not permitted to see because of the power of immediate and incessant suggestion by the media and the government.
I highly recommend purchasing and reading "Where Did the Towers Go?" if you dare to get a glimpse of what really happened on a day that shaped the current history of our world for at least the first decade of the 21st century.
Tracked by 8 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 1000 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jul 10, 2011 1:04:46 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 28, 2012 3:24:17 PM PDT
Andrew Johnson says:
For those wanting more information about how Dr Wood's study has been covered up, misquoted and misrepresented you could do worse than to read 911 Finding the Truth (And yes, I've posted this link in a few of the comments! And NO I don't get any money from that book! Also available as a free PDF and free audio-book download - google "Andrew Johnson 911 finding the truth".
Posted on Apr 15, 2012 8:54:59 AM PDT
S. R. Collier says:
you can get judy wood's recent UK talk at Lytham st.Annes on dvd by searching her name on ebay...this is a valuable addition to her brilliant book and will help in waking people up to one of the biggest lies in human history...there is no copyright on these dvds and we encourage copying and sending them to people in influential positions like MP's,Army generals,police officers and the like
Posted on Oct 27, 2012 11:26:35 PM PDT
I was wondering if any of Judy Wood's zombies are inconvenienced even slightly by the incontrovertible fact that the towers did NOT turn to dust. The energy requirements for Wood's imaginary weapons cannot be met.
ALL the structural steel was recovered. Between 1.2 and 1.5 MILLION tons of debris was hauled away over a period of months. Taken to holding areas, the steel was examined by teams of metallurgists and fifty-one different forensic teams from the FBI.
Wood refuses, for obvious reasons, to face real physicists in open debate. She is quite mad, you know.
Posted on Oct 27, 2012 11:33:43 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 27, 2012 11:34:13 PM PDT
You claim to have a degree in architecture, yet you were unable to read any of the NIST reports on the collapses of the towers. Judy Wood pretends that the buildings free fell. Unfortunately for her fantasy, there exist many videos and they show pieces of debris falling faster than the rest of the structure. Those pieces are, in fact, free-falling. Nobody sane thinks that the towers free-fell because they didn't. Are you not embarrassed to recommend such crackpot nonsense? You should be.
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 9, 2012 9:55:05 PM PST
S. Tiller says:
Just ignore Ronnie. He's a troll.
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 9, 2012 9:57:17 PM PST
S. Tiller says:
Absolutely wonderful and insightful work Mr. Johnson. You have exposed the 9/11 cover up and the players involved in it. Thank you.
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 9, 2012 11:04:38 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 9, 2012 11:05:03 PM PST
Yes, wonderful and insightful work that would be laughed out of court. Where is his Pulitzer Prize? Oh, that's right--he offers nothing but the same ancient crapola that's been debunked over and over and over.
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 9, 2012 11:05:47 PM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Dec 4, 2014 12:13:38 AM PST]
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 11, 2012 3:17:02 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 11, 2012 3:18:32 PM PST
Cathryn Troise says:
And just who do YOU work for, Ronald?
In reply to an earlier post on Nov 11, 2012 3:17:44 PM PST
[Deleted by the author on Nov 11, 2012 3:18:55 PM PST]