Automotive Deals Best Books of the Month Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it Pink Floyd Fire TV Stick Off to College Essentials Ruby jewelry Amazon Cash Back Offer harmonquest_s1 harmonquest_s1 harmonquest_s1  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Water Sports
Customer Review

581 of 700 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Ameritopia, January 18, 2012
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America (Hardcover)
Once again, through very researched detail and very precise wording, Mr. Levin gives us all a very ominous warning about what type of government growth we are careening towards and to what extent our personal liberties will necessarily be lost to that end. The book seems to be condensed to the point where re-reading usually brings out even more points to consider.
If you love what our country has always stood for and honestly want our Democratic-Republic to endure-this is a must read.
And very hard to argue with, hence the ratings attack by the lefists in this review section. It is their modus to simply slime something that they can not logically argue with.
Read and enjoy, then let it stew a week or so then re-read. You're bound to miss something the 1st time.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 5 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 41-50 of 492 posts in this discussion
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 6:07:59 AM PST
[Deleted by the author on Jan 21, 2012 6:09:32 AM PST]

Posted on Jan 21, 2012 6:08:40 AM PST
"... let it stew a week or so then re-read."
Interesting!

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 21, 2012 6:54:27 AM PST
I don't disagree with you on the PC part of the military, or the number of servicemen and women lacking direct combat experience. But those of us that have come to know war well, have an understanding that someone sitting comfortably in their armchair reading headlines does not have, experience. Don't get me wrong, helping Iraqi's establish power and water substations on the American taxpayer dime is certainly nobel, and certainly made their lives a little better, but that is hardly "defense."

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 21, 2012 7:19:49 AM PST
Pehaps you should reexamine your definition of defense.

"We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion:
The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands.
The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.
America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one."
--- GWB, Second Inaugural Address ---

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 21, 2012 8:23:17 AM PST
Dorothy says:
First off; have you read the book?
If you have not, why are you commentating?
Since you are obviously a Ron Paul supporter, does Dr. Paul actually know you are doing this?
I have seen Dr. Paul as a kind and just man. What you are doing now could get you kicked out of the clique.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 21, 2012 8:27:30 AM PST
Dorothy says:
Have you read the book?
If not, why are you even here commenting?
Please go back to your hive and regroup.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 21, 2012 9:46:43 AM PST
F. Hollister says:
Rock Head:

Why don't you look at the FEC data for political campaign contributions?

In both the 2008 election and this one, more active duty US military personnel have supported Dr. Paul (in dollar terms) than any other GNoPee candidate.

Some of the right wing gas bags lie about that (including one of Off-the-Mark's "C-List," back bench replacements - but that's the fact.

Perhaps the problem isn't all them? Perhaps they are correct about Dr. Paul's views on foreign policy, and military vs. defense spending.

Posted on Jan 21, 2012 10:28:10 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Jan 21, 2012 11:36:54 AM PST
Nice try, but your lies have been falling flat for a long time now, holly.

Most folks who donate less than $200 do not disclose their occupations, and are not counted by the FEC.
Ron Paul's statistically insignificant claims include folks who claim to be "affiliated" with the military.
This includes spouses, children, parents and siblings.

They also include non-military civil service employees who happen to work on or in affiliation of a military base, or a private sector employee with limited clearance.
For example, a florist courier that delivers flowers to a homosexual civil servant who works on a base.

Factor out the anti-American Bradley Manning-type REMFs and the "affiliated" as a percentage, and Ron Paul's military receipts are an indiscernible fraction of the margin of error.

And don't forget that also categorized as "military" are positions such as "victim advocates," "sensitivity training facilitators," the "Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services" and the "sexual harassment task force."

What a joke.

Posted on Jan 22, 2012 7:00:49 AM PST
Rigil says:
You are right, I have read it twice and I am sure there are things mentioned I have not really understood at the dept that it was intended by the author.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 22, 2012 8:22:04 AM PST
F. Hollister says:
RockHead:

So along with being a right wing nut you're a bigot?

Keep telling yourself that everything is OK and there's nothing to worry about.

You can spin to your little heart's content - it won't change the facts.

According to you, contributors to Dr. Paul are going out of their way to appear to be part of the US Military?

Got any more conspiracy theories?

As for contributions of less than $200, are you suggesting those don't make any difference to the GNoPee candidates?