35 of 51 people found the following review helpful
WASTING YOUR $$$$ RUNNING THIS LIGHT,
This review is from: Sun System® HPS 150 Grow Light Fixture
This light is supposed to be 150 watts, correct? Yes and no. Well it draws 3.3 amps continuously and given the equation watts=ampsXvolts, watts=3.3X120 so watts is actually around 390. In other words, VA=390 which is what most power companies will charge you for while your product will be consuming 150 "watts" which is true. You are paying the same as you would be running a 400 watt electronic ballast.
Tracked by 2 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-8 of 8 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jan 2, 2013 12:45:03 AM PST
Read Flusser says:
Are there any 150w hps fixtures that you can recommend?
In reply to an earlier post on Feb 1, 2013 2:58:52 PM PST
Yes, the Hydrofarm brand version of this system. In my review of the MH version of the aforementioned system I meticulously outlined the power consumption as a selling point on that unit even though the price was high enough almost to buy an ipower 400 watt full setup. Here is a link
Hydrofarm SBM150S 150-Watt Mini Sunburst with HPS Lamp
In reply to an earlier post on Sep 26, 2013 6:24:07 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 26, 2013 6:24:17 AM PDT
I believe he is correct about the 400watt power draw, someone else reported the same problem at http://www.rollitup.org/indoor-growing/22
Posted on Jan 5, 2014 11:57:00 PM PST
the hydrofarm 150 hps is the same way 4.5 amps at startup and 3.3 amps nominal??? I asked an electrician he said it should blow the bulb instanly, and the specs must be wrong and people are testing them wrong? but two differnt brands same HUGE power guzzling fixters for some unknown reason? I have a hydrofarm 250 watt 2.5 amps right on he side more lumens AND smaller bill from public sevice! was going to supplement that light with this but not now might as well buy a 600 watt dimmable. the 400 watt and 600 watt are thwe same way both use the same amps(and power consumtion) but the 600 has way more the lumens!
Posted on Feb 6, 2014 3:14:57 PM PST
are you sure that this information is correct? It would really be a shame if that were true and also a bit misleading that the lamp pushes 150 watts, power continuously.
In reply to an earlier post on Feb 23, 2014 3:32:45 PM PST
On the Sun System website the manual has an expected cost graph that says it consumes 165w continuously.
Posted on Apr 16, 2014 4:32:28 PM PDT
Volt-amps (VA) is not always equal to watts and the utility company will charge you for watts, not VA. What happens is that the peak voltage may not be at the same time as the peak current (amperage). If you're interested, do a search on "power factor" and "phase difference" (and to avoid flames, yes, power companies can charge extra for low power factor loads).
I don't own this light, but I would be very surprised if it took much over 150 watts.
(BTW, I'm an electrical engineer).
Hope this helps.
In reply to an earlier post on Sep 9, 2014 9:10:00 AM PDT
J. Burt says:
It seems that the manufacturers know that the public might tend to use the 'watt' rating as a measure of the amount of light the plant would receive. They really should provide a 'lumens/watt' number. But then we would start wondering what amount of energy is in each part of the spectrum :)
‹ Previous 1 Next ›