Customer Review

10 of 64 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Wow! Our freedoms really are in trouble! Just look at that cover!, November 4, 2007
This review is from: Censored 2008: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2006#07 (Paperback)
Ahh, another year, another collection of quasi-news sensationally described as "censored" by the corporate media. (It's always "corporate," even though one of the editors' favorite targets, the Associated Press, is actually a nonprofit. But I guess I'm splitting hairs here.)

Yes, there are some legitimate stories in these collections that, for a multitude of reasons -- the least likely of which is that mainstream media's corporate/Republican paymasters simply didn't like them -- never really gained their place in the national conversation.

The media are far from perfect. But to say that mainstream journalists haven't been doing their job -- as is the overarching point of these collections -- is disingenuous at best. To say so is leaving out the fact that the crusty ol' New York Times, Washington Post, CBS News and even -- gasp! -- USA Today have broken and given prominent, in-depth play to such important stories as warrantless wiretapping, Abu Ghraib, secret CIA prisons, national security letters and the telecoms' cooperation with the letters, etc., etc. Local newspapers such as The (Toledo, Ohio) Blade and The Times-Picayune of New Orleans have done outstanding work in their back yards and at the national level recent years, despite shrinking circulations and news staffs (a phenomenon that's the real overlooked story here, folks.)

This year's Censored edition is more ridiculous than usual in that, in the chapter updating the previous year's "censored" stories, is a section on Steven Jones, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a conspiracy theorist group. Apparently, one of his essays was included in the 2007 Censored edition (I missed out on that one. Darn it.), to the consternation of some of the very people involved in Project Censored. The way it's described in this edition, two of the project's judges resigned over the inclusion of the Jones essay. That alone should be enough for Project Censored, at the very least, to explain to us what the hell happened -- but instead, we're treated to a rehash of the WTC7 collapse conspiracy theory. That's their story, and they're sticking to it, I suppose, but it sounds to me like Project Censored has been doing a little self-censorship of its own.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Be the first person to comment on this review.

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 


Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Washington D.C.

Top Reviewer Ranking: 14,805,807